Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Utah22-15 (0.595) | Pac-12
All-Play Percentage: 0.870 (48th)
Schedule Strength: 0.699 (28th)
Record Quality: 0.272 (57th)
Avg. Season Rank: 44.58 (41st)
Pace: 69.89 (59th)
Momentum: 2.16 (80th)
Off. Momentum: 2.11 (75th)
Def. Momentum: 0.05 (139th)
Consistency: -9.83 (263rd)
Res. Consistency: -16.40 (351st)
Away From Home: -4.49 (361st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.98 (273rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
113.69
69.96
23.86
65.34
87.94
42.22
48.01
35.67
13.67
38.32
18.76
7.41
39.50
33.51
21.14
63.08
10.87
14.05
6.31
40.56
21.33
38.11
2.02
RANK:
49th
57th
279th
346th
66th
19th
29th
52nd
21st
16th
299th
290th
160th
79th
32nd
45th
211th
143rd
101st
78th
320th
111th
212th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
97.42
69.82
21.92
--
88.95
35.99
40.46
32.16
10.23
31.80
25.83
9.63
37.27
30.97
16.14
52.12
10.12
12.81
4.59
36.15
29.04
34.81
2.01
RANK:
39th
304th
26th
--
320th
93rd
32nd
216th
125th
48th
294th
258th
104th
180th
80th
29th
82nd
132nd
64th
143rd
267th
126th
166th
ANALYSIS: This website places Utah in the top 25% of all NCAA college basketball teams this year. They are ranked #48 (out of 362) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 22-15. Of the 12 schools in the Pac-12 (average ranking 75.2), they're currently ranked as our #4 team in the conference.
Utah will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 39th in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 98 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Utah does a pretty solid job avoiding careless fouls and minimizing opponents' opportunities from the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 21.92 vs. AO, they are currently rated 26th in the country in that category. Utah will also take a bite out of many opponents' shooting percentages, based on the fact that the team ranks in the top-50 in three of our four primary defensive field goal categories. They allow AO to convert only 31.8% of their three-pointers (48th in the nation), 52.1% of their near-proximity attempts (29th), and 40.5% of their total shots from the field (32nd). If Utah does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 88.95 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 43rd-worst in college basketball.
Utah plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 49th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 114 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Utah is an excellent shooting team, capable of converting from multiple locations on the court and ranking in the top-50 in three of our four primary field goal categories. They convert 38.3% of their three-pointers (16th in the nation), 63.1% of their near-proximity attempts (45th), and 48.0% of their total shots from the field (29th) vs. AO. Utah also does a pretty decent job in most cases to maximize opportunities to score on offense. The team is ranked 66th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 87.94 vs. AO. If Utah does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's poor shooting at the line. The squad makes just 65.3% of their free throw attempts, which ranks 17th-worst in Division I.
On the road, Utah performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked second from the bottom in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, Utah often performs worse than normal. Utah is more efficient than usual 27% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.68%. In their other contests, Utah performs better than the norm 64% of the time.
Utah does better vs. clubs that prefer the outside shot. When playing squads that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.01, Utah performs above average 71% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 35% of the time.
Utah performs worse against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.40, Utah is more efficient than normal 35% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 71% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.