TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Texas Tech  23-11 (0.676)  |  Big 12
All-Play Percentage: 0.886 (42nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.680 (48th)
Record Quality: 0.337 (35th)
Avg. Season Rank: 37.13 (33rd)
Pace: 67.29 (225th)
Momentum: -0.77 (209th)
Off. Momentum: -1.82 (305th)
Def. Momentum: 1.05 (93rd)
Consistency: -9.41 (202nd)
Res. Consistency: -12.86 (230th)
Away From Home: -0.72 (247th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.96 (271st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 115.79 28.70 78.52 87.70 45.89 35.47 36.00 21.95 40.26 30.28 61.55 12.77 14.21 6.11 40.44 25.03 34.53 2.06
RANK: 29th 88th 11th 74th 89th 65th 84th 196th 130th 206th 79th 106th 140th 116th 81st 221st 236th 279th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.25 23.08 -- 85.76 41.78 31.99 31.68 25.59 34.92 28.18 59.48 8.94 13.04 4.60 37.30 29.84 32.86 2.04
RANK: 50th 50th -- 188th 69th 209th 43rd 286th 27th 73rd 247th 22nd 154th 66th 200th 292nd 68th 94th

ANALYSIS:
Texas Tech is a moderately good team, capable of testing many an opponent that they'll encounter. Ranked 42nd overall (out of 362) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 23-11. Of the 14 schools in the Big 12 (average ranking 48.4), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

Texas Tech has a reasonably potent offensive attack. Occupying the #29 slot in our offensive efficiency rankings, they will score about 116 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas Tech is deadly accurate at the free throw line. Making 78.5% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 11th nationally in free throw percentage. Moreover, they get ample opportunity to beat you from the line, as the ball-club falls in the top-100 in free throw attempt rate with a rating of 28.70 vs. AO. Texas Tech also allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.94, which ranks #22 in the country.

Texas Tech plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 50th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 98 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas Tech has been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 27th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 34.9% of their attempts from that distance. Texas Tech has also done a very good job to prevent opponents from draining threes this year. They rank 43rd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.7% of their attempts from afar.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Texas Tech performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.52%, Texas Tech is more efficient than normal 87% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 32% of the time.
When playing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, Texas Tech usually performs better than average. Texas Tech is more efficient than normal 91% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.90. In all other contests, Texas Tech performs better than average 39% of the time.
Texas Tech is typically worse vs. teams that effectively clean the offensive glass. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 15.79, Texas Tech performs above their norm 20% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 71% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2510th10th26th12thBig 12239th134th30th244th203rd13th
2023-2442nd42nd56th35thBig 12225th202nd48th271st247th33rd
2022-2358th58th193rd121stBig 12235th313th44th351st79th41st
2021-224th4th42nd19thBig 12220th251st29th106th353rd17th
2020-2113th13th102nd54thBig 12317th122nd70th333rd272nd9th
2019-2019th19th131st75thBig 12262nd322nd60th52nd159th21st
2018-192nd2nd14th6thBig 12272nd345th33rd25th125th11th
2017-1819th19th36th16thBig 12291st94th30th166th211th16th
2016-1733rd33rd134th81stBig 12327th244th63rd325th339th32nd
2015-1651st51st121st48thBig 12314th268th11th309th322nd37th
2014-15160th160th249th177thBig 12323rd261st74th346th350th143rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-258th137th70th2nd50th19th50th136th20th213th41st155th16th60th75th191st308th323rd
2023-2429th88th11th74th89th65th84th196th130th206th79th106th140th116th81st221st236th279th
2022-2348th127th162nd86th51st205th60th203rd287th57th51st80th154th46th244th222nd81st92nd
2021-2221st42nd235th166th10th271st92nd236th82nd21st13th15th79th17th276th243rd20th36th
2020-2119th14th109th13th85th298th32nd12th224th99th93rd60th65th165th332nd30th190th60th
2019-2026th147th29th160th19th199th13th124th134th181st21st36th303rd207th211th129th173rd158th
2018-1912th86th57th158th6th211th4th81st50th237th6th106th265th156th209th73rd250th197th
2017-1846th8th223rd116th58th277th90th210th104th22nd127th69th39th23rd289th226th28th33rd
2016-1739th53rd100th107th42nd248th65th61st66th215th28th241st219th86th260th61st229th140th
2015-1634th37th45th69th66th282nd67th91st169th43rd96th122nd68th43rd303rd109th63rd39th
2014-15181st19th314th273rd183rd244th195th256th320th70th164th108th76th93rd224th240th56th80th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2522nd152nd--61st33rd50th30th341st63rd38th61st12th32nd8th84th355th53rd148th
2023-2450th50th--188th69th209th43rd286th27th73rd247th22nd154th66th200th292nd68th94th
2022-2377th85th--214th38th353rd85th158th9th28th207th213th162nd124th347th132nd18th14th
2021-221st154th--10th1st322nd33rd148th70th1st6th65th13th27th353rd242nd1st1st
2020-2113th195th--11th49th155th165th292nd23rd3rd245th1st55th112th271st333rd8th20th
2019-2013th222nd--27th33rd92nd33rd242nd69th34th86th6th72nd57th155th305th63rd122nd
2018-191st140th--13th1st156th3rd270th4th15th6th73rd127th5th244th309th29th37th
2017-188th286th--28th10th97th20th119th11th137th14th90th152nd88th157th170th194th189th
2016-1751st93rd--37th55th324th120th126th224th4th64th8th3rd10th343rd180th11th6th
2015-1681st62nd--199th68th318th182nd106th45th138th59th172nd77th68th313th101st123rd59th
2014-15150th137th--134th149th321st184th52nd186th106th162nd297th42nd125th332nd53rd113th47th