Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Texas Tech 18-13 (0.581) | Big 12

All-Play Percentage: 0.949 (19^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.674 (60^th)	Record Quality: 0.207 (75^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 23.01 (21^st)
Pace: 68.17 (262^nd)	Momentum: -1.60 (256^th)	Off. Momentum: 0.35 (205^th)	Def. Momentum: -1.95 (264^th)
Consistency: -10.45 (322^nd)	Res. Consistency: -13.27 (273^rd)	Away From Home: -0.06 (159^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 0.89 (52^nd)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

109.02

26.04

76.40

82.06

47.42

29.86

37.86

23.91

37.95

28.29

65.51

13.95

10.32

4.57

36.39

29.13

34.48

2.02

RANK:

26^th

147^th

29^th

160^th

19^th

199^th

13^th

124^th

134^th

181^st

21^st

36^th

303^rd

207^th

211^th

129^th

173^rd

158^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

88.35

26.40

77.22

39.92

28.66

30.40

24.15

34.45

24.40

56.53

7.41

11.46

4.01

37.12

31.28

31.60

2.06

RANK:

13^th

222^nd

27^th

33^rd

92^nd

33^rd

242^nd

69^th

34^th

86^th

6^th

72^nd

57^th

155^th

305^th

63^rd

122^nd

ANALYSIS:
Despite their unexceptional win percentage, Texas Tech should be regarded as one of the better teams in college hoops. Their record this season is 18-13, and the club is ranked 19th overall (out of 353) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the 10 schools in the Big 12 (average ranking 45.9), they're currently ranked as our #4 team in the conference.

Texas Tech has been a force on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 13th in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 89 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas Tech does a really good job to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 27th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 77.22 vs. AO. Texas Tech also boasts one of the better overall defensive field goal percentages in the country. The team ranks #33 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 39.9% of their total attempts from the floor.

Texas Tech plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 26th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 109 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas Tech allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 7.41, which ranks #6 in the country. Texas Tech is also a very dangerous team when it comes to shooting the rock, ranking in the top-25 in three of our four major field goal categories. They convert 37.9% of their three-pointers (13th in the nation), 65.5% of their near-proximity attempts (21st), and 47.4% of their total shots from the field (19th) vs. AO.

Texas Tech has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 322nd in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/5/2019	vs E. Illinois₂₃₅	W 78.78 - 56.31	W 85-60	1-0	110.84	123.41	▲ 12.57	83.88	75.33	▲ 8.55	▲ 21.12
Sat 11/9/2019	vs Bethune-Cookman₃₀₇	W 84.25 - 55.74	W 79-44	2-0	113.94	97.13	▼ 16.81	80.11	56.46	▲ 23.65	▲ 6.84
Wed 11/13/2019	vs Houston Baptist₃₃₆ *	W 95.25 - 64.78	W 103-74	3-0	126.73	129.69	▲ 2.96	87.33	82.54	▲ 4.79	▲ 7.75
Thu 11/21/2019	vs Tennessee St.₂₅₀	W 78.59 - 55.03	W 72-57	4-0	111.71	93.33	▼ 18.38	82.85	77.17	▲ 5.68	▼ 12.70
Sun 11/24/2019	vs Long Island₂₆₃	W 83.91 - 58.88	W 96-66	5-0	113.92	126.73	▲ 12.81	84.99	95.93	▼ 10.94	▲ 1.87
Thu 11/28/2019	vs Iowa₂₀ *	L 71.64 - 71.64	L 61-72	5-1	103.36	82.43	▼ 20.93	103.39	96.00	▲ 7.39	▼ 13.54
Fri 11/29/2019	vs Creighton₈ *	L 70.63 - 72.29	L 76-83 (OT)	5-2	104.00	117.46	▲ 13.46	106.98	117.46	▼ 10.48	▲ 2.98
Wed 12/4/2019	@ DePaul₁₀₉	W 70.89 - 63.63	L 60-65 (OT)	5-3	103.22	86.57	▼ 16.65	88.25	81.68	▲ 6.57	▼ 10.08
Tue 12/10/2019	vs Louisville₁₀ *	L 66.99 - 68.08	W 70-57	6-3	99.80	86.49	▼ 13.31	101.44	68.49	▲ 32.95	▲ 19.64
Mon 12/16/2019	vs Southern Miss₂₅₉	W 76.59 - 53.05	W 71-65	7-3	110.56	98.98	▼ 11.58	81.38	93.75	▼ 12.37	▼ 23.95
Sat 12/21/2019	vs UT Rio Grande₂₃₈	W 81.31 - 57.87	W 68-58	8-3	112.43	96.82	▼ 15.61	85.68	87.43	▼ 1.75	▼ 17.36
Sun 12/29/2019	vs CSU Bakersfield₂₆₆	W 74.93 - 51.64	W 73-58	9-3	110.77	110.57	▼ 0.20	81.08	91.63	▼ 10.55	▼ 10.75
Sat 1/4/2020	vs Oklahoma State₅₃	W 71.30 - 62.42	W 85-50	10-3	102.27	128.25	▲ 25.98	94.72	76.96	▲ 17.76	▲ 43.74
Tue 1/7/2020	vs Baylor₄	L 64.59 - 65.23	L 52-57	10-4	95.53	80.09	▼ 15.44	101.55	92.92	▲ 8.63	▼ 6.81
Sat 1/11/2020	@ West Virginia₁₂	L 62.88 - 66.63	L 54-66	10-5	94.23	72.78	▼ 21.45	95.25	86.12	▲ 9.13	▼ 12.32
Tue 1/14/2020	@ Kansas State₉₀	W 66.31 - 61.00	W 77-63	11-5	101.14	114.76	▲ 13.62	88.76	89.62	▼ 0.86	▲ 12.76
Sat 1/18/2020	vs Iowa State₉₁	W 76.99 - 64.62	W 72-52	12-5	108.47	116.07	▲ 7.60	96.24	76.52	▲ 19.72	▲ 27.32
Tue 1/21/2020	@ TCU₈₁	W 66.17 - 61.97	L 54-65	12-6	104.17	86.82	▼ 17.35	92.84	99.11	▼ 6.27	▼ 23.62
Sat 1/25/2020	vs Kentucky₃₀	W 71.23 - 65.79	L 74-76 (OT)	12-7	103.53	93.07	▼ 10.46	100.68	99.42	▲ 1.26	▼ 9.20
Wed 1/29/2020	vs West Virginia₁₂	W 66.33 - 63.46	W 89-81	13-7	94.23	111.29	▲ 17.06	95.25	112.89	▼ 17.64	▼ 0.58
Sat 2/1/2020	@ Kansas₁	L 60.60 - 71.57	L 75-78	13-8	93.08	108.08	▲ 15.00	104.30	107.41	▼ 3.11	▲ 11.89
Tue 2/4/2020	vs Oklahoma₄₁	W 71.54 - 64.77	W 69-61	14-8	100.60	105.36	▲ 4.76	96.26	99.27	▼ 3.01	▲ 1.75
Sat 2/8/2020	@ Texas₆₇	W 64.91 - 61.52	W 62-57	15-8	101.39	94.99	▼ 6.40	90.93	83.92	▲ 7.01	▲ 0.61
Mon 2/10/2020	vs TCU₈₁	W 69.45 - 58.94	W 88-42	16-8	104.17	136.19	▲ 32.02	92.84	66.08	▲ 26.76	▲ 58.78
Sat 2/15/2020	@ Oklahoma State₅₃	W 67.88 - 65.75	L 70-73	16-9	102.27	110.14	▲ 7.87	94.72	108.16	▼ 13.44	▼ 5.57
Wed 2/19/2020	vs Kansas State₉₀	W 69.70 - 57.87	W 69-62	17-9	101.14	100.54	▼ 0.60	88.76	94.99	▼ 6.23	▼ 6.83
Sat 2/22/2020	@ Iowa State₉₁	W 73.49 - 68.05	W 87-57	18-9	108.47	136.38	▲ 27.91	96.24	88.46	▲ 7.78	▲ 35.69
Tue 2/25/2020	@ Oklahoma₄₁	L 68.05 - 68.24	L 51-65	18-10	100.60	80.91	▼ 19.69	96.26	97.55	▼ 1.29	▼ 20.98
Sat 2/29/2020	vs Texas₆₇	W 68.22 - 58.35	L 58-68	18-11	101.39	95.86	▼ 5.53	90.93	117.70	▼ 26.77	▼ 32.30
Mon 3/2/2020	@ Baylor₄	L 61.28 - 68.40	L 68-71 (OT)	18-12	95.53	100.81	▲ 5.28	101.55	95.91	▲ 5.64	▲ 10.92
Sat 3/7/2020	vs Kansas₁	L 63.96 - 68.38	L 62-66	18-13	93.08	90.09	▼ 2.99	104.30	99.51	▲ 4.79	▲ 1.80
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Texas Tech is typically better vs. teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.15, Texas Tech performs above their norm 67% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 27% of the time.
	When facing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, Texas Tech often performs better than normal. Texas Tech is more efficient than usual 67% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.36%. In their other contests, Texas Tech performs better than the norm 27% of the time.
	Texas Tech does better vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.25, Texas Tech performs above average 50% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 11% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	No. 4 Baylor holds on for 71-68 overtime win over Texas Tech (3/3/2020 12:02:00 AM) 13 left in overtime and No. 4 Baylor held on for a 71-68 win over Texas Tech on Monday night. Teague's shot put the Bears up 69-65, though Kyler Edwards then hit a 3 for Texas Tech. Short-handed Baylor (26-3, 15-2 Big 12) sealed the game with Jared Butler ...
	Draisaitl has 4 goals, 5 points as Oilers beat Predators 8-3 (3/2/2020 10:54:00 PM) 13 left in overtime and No. 4 Baylor held on for a 71-68 win over Texas Tech on Monday night. Teague's shot put the Bears up 69-65, though Kyler Edwards then hit a 3 for Texas Tech. Short-handed Baylor (26-3, 15-2 Big 12) sealed the game with Jared Butler's steal and his two free throws with 11 seconds remaining. MIAMI (AP) — The NBA has told ...
	Texas tops No. 22 Texas Tech 68-58 for 4th straight win (2/29/2020 7:03:00 PM) stretching its winning streak to four games with a 68-58 victory at No. 22 Texas Tech on Saturday. Royce Hamm Jr. had a putback layup to put Texas up 62-58 with 50 seconds left. Texas Tech then had a chance to cut the gap, but freshman Jahmi’us Ramsey’s dunk attempt ricocheted off the back of the rim. Matt Coleman III got the rebound and ...
	Red Raiders roll to a win on the road, 87-57 over Iowa State (2/23/2020 2:09:00 AM) The Texas Tech Red Raiders went to Ames, Iowa and topped Iowa State 87-57 Saturday evening. Tech is now 18-9 overall and 9-5 in the Big 12 Conference. (Source: Texas Tech Athletics) AMES, IOWA (KCBD) - The Texas Tech Red Raiders went to Ames, Iowa and ...
	Red Raiders beat Stanford in Round Rock (2/22/2020 11:29:00 PM) The 5-1 Red Raiders close out the Round Rock Classic Sunday afternoon facing Houston. The Texas Tech Red Raiders went to Ames, Iowa and topped Iowa State 87-57 Saturday evening. Tech is now 18-9 overall and 9-5 in the Big 12 Conference. Texas Tech baseball ...

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	9	0.978	28-9 (0.757)	0.757	0.475	Big 12	65.83	-9.16	0.732	-1.54	-0.47	16.04
2023-24	42	0.886	23-11 (0.676)	0.676	0.337	Big 12	67.29	-9.41	0.680	-1.96	-0.72	37.13
2022-23	58	0.843	16-16 (0.500)	0.500	0.118	Big 12	66.92	-10.40	0.673	-4.61	0.29	45.95
2021-22	4	0.992	27-10 (0.730)	0.730	0.419	Big 12	67.20	-9.85	0.686	-0.17	-2.54	18.51
2020-21	13	0.966	18-11 (0.621)	0.621	0.267	Big 12	66.87	-8.75	0.693	-4.62	-1.14	12.50
2019-20	19	0.949	18-13 (0.581)	0.581	0.207	Big 12	68.17	-10.45	0.674	0.89	-0.06	23.01
2018-19	2	0.997	31-7 (0.816)	0.816	0.544	Big 12	67.08	-11.95	0.728	1.51	0.34	13.15
2017-18	19	0.949	27-10 (0.730)	0.730	0.431	Big 12	68.16	-8.35	0.726	-0.79	-0.79	20.42
2016-17	33	0.909	18-14 (0.563)	0.563	0.174	Big 12	66.33	-9.49	0.667	-3.41	-2.58	31.97
2015-16	51	0.857	19-13 (0.594)	0.594	0.274	Big 12	67.04	-9.62	0.740	-2.88	-1.79	42.76
2014-15	160	0.546	13-19 (0.406)	0.406	-0.010	Big 12	62.66	-9.92	0.638	-5.21	-5.72	146.98

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	126.65	28.30	75.42	95.36	47.26	41.11	36.93	23.23	43.11	31.02	64.05	12.54	19.68	7.39	43.11	24.36	32.53	2.11
2023-24	115.79	28.70	78.52	87.70	45.89	35.47	36.00	21.95	40.26	30.28	61.55	12.77	14.21	6.11	40.44	25.03	34.53	2.06
2022-23	110.84	26.18	72.24	86.82	46.54	30.62	36.28	23.38	35.60	32.82	63.91	12.52	14.60	6.76	35.27	26.93	37.80	1.97
2021-22	112.30	28.27	69.92	84.58	49.00	27.63	34.91	22.94	39.75	34.02	66.67	14.98	15.09	7.07	32.66	27.12	40.22	1.92
2020-21	111.92	30.05	73.12	87.78	45.48	26.98	37.42	31.12	36.87	29.68	61.85	13.28	15.19	4.91	30.74	35.45	33.81	1.97
2019-20	109.02	26.04	76.40	82.06	47.42	29.86	37.86	23.91	37.95	28.29	65.51	13.95	10.32	4.57	36.39	29.13	34.48	2.02
2018-19	116.86	28.20	74.82	83.58	49.77	31.31	40.13	24.04	39.24	28.23	69.44	12.62	12.01	6.06	37.46	28.76	33.78	2.04
2017-18	111.47	32.47	70.43	83.10	47.18	27.59	36.92	21.63	38.71	33.89	60.94	12.63	17.99	9.43	33.20	26.03	40.78	1.92
2016-17	111.68	31.00	72.74	82.89	47.63	27.13	37.50	28.19	38.95	27.57	66.46	9.69	13.77	7.57	32.73	34.01	33.27	1.99
2015-16	111.37	32.60	73.92	84.57	46.04	25.41	37.06	26.85	35.48	32.31	61.87	11.48	17.05	8.57	30.05	31.74	38.21	1.92
2014-15	99.30	34.38	64.41	79.78	42.79	26.07	34.05	22.97	31.32	30.74	58.78	12.35	17.06	7.36	32.67	28.80	38.53	1.94

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	95.95	26.64	--	84.52	39.91	30.31	30.71	26.34	34.19	27.87	55.32	8.85	12.25	3.84	35.86	31.17	32.97	2.03
2023-24	98.25	23.08	--	85.76	41.78	31.99	31.68	25.59	34.92	28.18	59.48	8.94	13.04	4.60	37.30	29.84	32.86	2.04
2022-23	97.70	23.05	--	85.50	40.33	37.53	32.30	22.88	32.14	25.10	59.80	11.12	13.61	4.91	43.89	26.75	29.36	2.15
2021-22	83.40	24.06	--	78.11	36.21	34.70	29.68	23.79	35.15	19.61	49.03	9.34	9.89	3.46	44.42	30.46	25.11	2.19
2020-21	88.95	24.99	--	76.21	40.61	30.17	33.69	25.80	33.02	20.24	60.61	5.15	10.79	4.39	39.59	33.86	26.56	2.13
2019-20	88.35	26.40	--	77.22	39.92	28.66	30.40	24.15	34.45	24.40	56.53	7.41	11.46	4.01	37.12	31.28	31.60	2.06
2018-19	82.04	25.34	--	78.40	35.23	31.58	28.89	22.78	28.47	24.04	49.97	10.22	13.08	3.68	40.28	29.06	30.66	2.10
2017-18	90.30	28.80	--	77.72	39.09	28.83	31.57	21.17	32.22	27.72	52.14	9.90	14.36	5.96	37.10	27.23	35.67	2.01
2016-17	94.69	25.34	--	77.85	41.37	33.95	34.51	22.52	37.88	21.38	55.92	7.80	9.95	4.36	43.61	28.93	27.47	2.16
2015-16	97.74	25.56	--	82.65	41.27	32.55	34.98	22.25	32.62	27.84	55.53	10.86	13.48	5.68	39.39	26.92	33.69	2.06
2014-15	99.88	27.95	--	81.19	42.88	32.22	34.86	22.25	35.79	26.72	58.45	12.98	13.19	6.21	39.68	27.40	32.92	2.07

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	9^th	9	9^th	9	26^th	26	12^th	12	Big 12	Big 12	238^th	238	136^th	136	30^th	30	244^th	244	202^nd	202	13^th	13
2023-24	42^nd	42	42^nd	42	56^th	56	35^th	35	Big 12	Big 12	225^th	225	202^nd	202	48^th	48	271^st	271	247^th	247	33^rd	33
2022-23	58^th	58	58^th	58	193^rd	193	121^st	121	Big 12	Big 12	235^th	235	313^th	313	44^th	44	351^st	351	79^th	79	41^st	41
2021-22	4^th	4	4^th	4	42^nd	42	19^th	19	Big 12	Big 12	220^th	220	251^st	251	29^th	29	106^th	106	353^rd	353	17^th	17
2020-21	13^th	13	13^th	13	102^nd	102	54^th	54	Big 12	Big 12	317^th	317	122^nd	122	70^th	70	333^rd	333	272^nd	272	9^th	9
2019-20	19^th	19	19^th	19	131^st	131	75^th	75	Big 12	Big 12	262^nd	262	322^nd	322	60^th	60	52^nd	52	159^th	159	21^st	21
2018-19	2^nd	2	2^nd	2	14^th	14	6^th	6	Big 12	Big 12	272^nd	272	345^th	345	33^rd	33	25^th	25	125^th	125	11^th	11
2017-18	19^th	19	19^th	19	36^th	36	16^th	16	Big 12	Big 12	291^st	291	94^th	94	30^th	30	166^th	166	211^th	211	16^th	16
2016-17	33^rd	33	33^rd	33	134^th	134	81^st	81	Big 12	Big 12	327^th	327	244^th	244	63^rd	63	325^th	325	339^th	339	32^nd	32
2015-16	51^st	51	51^st	51	121^st	121	48^th	48	Big 12	Big 12	314^th	314	268^th	268	11^th	11	309^th	309	322^nd	322	37^th	37
2014-15	160^th	160	160^th	160	249^th	249	177^th	177	Big 12	Big 12	323^rd	323	261^st	261	74^th	74	346^th	346	350^th	350	143^rd	143

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	8^th	8	137^th	137	70^th	70	2^nd	2	48^th	48	18^th	18	47^th	47	136^th	136	21^st	21	213^th	213	41^st	41	158^th	158	16^th	16	59^th	59	75^th	75	190^th	190	308^th	308	324^th	324
2023-24	29^th	29	88^th	88	11^th	11	74^th	74	89^th	89	65^th	65	84^th	84	196^th	196	130^th	130	206^th	206	79^th	79	106^th	106	140^th	140	116^th	116	81^st	81	221^st	221	236^th	236	279^th	279
2022-23	48^th	48	127^th	127	162^nd	162	86^th	86	51^st	51	205^th	205	60^th	60	203^rd	203	287^th	287	57^th	57	51^st	51	80^th	80	154^th	154	46^th	46	244^th	244	222^nd	222	81^st	81	92^nd	92
2021-22	21^st	21	42^nd	42	235^th	235	166^th	166	10^th	10	271^st	271	92^nd	92	236^th	236	82^nd	82	21^st	21	13^th	13	15^th	15	79^th	79	17^th	17	276^th	276	243^rd	243	20^th	20	36^th	36
2020-21	19^th	19	14^th	14	109^th	109	13^th	13	85^th	85	298^th	298	32^nd	32	12^th	12	224^th	224	99^th	99	93^rd	93	60^th	60	65^th	65	165^th	165	332^nd	332	30^th	30	190^th	190	60^th	60
2019-20	26^th	26	147^th	147	29^th	29	160^th	160	19^th	19	199^th	199	13^th	13	124^th	124	134^th	134	181^st	181	21^st	21	36^th	36	303^rd	303	207^th	207	211^th	211	129^th	129	173^rd	173	158^th	158
2018-19	12^th	12	86^th	86	57^th	57	158^th	158	6^th	6	211^th	211	4^th	4	81^st	81	50^th	50	237^th	237	6^th	6	106^th	106	265^th	265	156^th	156	209^th	209	73^rd	73	250^th	250	197^th	197
2017-18	46^th	46	8^th	8	223^rd	223	116^th	116	58^th	58	277^th	277	90^th	90	210^th	210	104^th	104	22^nd	22	127^th	127	69^th	69	39^th	39	23^rd	23	289^th	289	226^th	226	28^th	28	33^rd	33
2016-17	39^th	39	53^rd	53	100^th	100	107^th	107	42^nd	42	248^th	248	65^th	65	61^st	61	66^th	66	215^th	215	28^th	28	241^st	241	219^th	219	86^th	86	260^th	260	61^st	61	229^th	229	140^th	140
2015-16	34^th	34	37^th	37	45^th	45	69^th	69	66^th	66	282^nd	282	67^th	67	91^st	91	169^th	169	43^rd	43	96^th	96	122^nd	122	68^th	68	43^rd	43	303^rd	303	109^th	109	63^rd	63	39^th	39
2014-15	181^st	181	19^th	19	314^th	314	273^rd	273	183^rd	183	244^th	244	195^th	195	256^th	256	320^th	320	70^th	70	164^th	164	108^th	108	76^th	76	93^rd	93	224^th	224	240^th	240	56^th	56	80^th	80

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	22^nd	22	153^rd	153	--	--	62^nd	62	33^rd	33	45^th	45	27^th	27	342^nd	342	65^th	65	39^th	39	60^th	60	13^th	13	30^th	30	9^th	9	79^th	79	355^th	355	54^th	54	151^st	151
2023-24	50^th	50	50^th	50	--	--	188^th	188	69^th	69	209^th	209	43^rd	43	286^th	286	27^th	27	73^rd	73	247^th	247	22^nd	22	154^th	154	66^th	66	200^th	200	292^nd	292	68^th	68	94^th	94
2022-23	77^th	77	85^th	85	--	--	214^th	214	38^th	38	353^rd	353	85^th	85	158^th	158	9^th	9	28^th	28	207^th	207	213^th	213	162^nd	162	124^th	124	347^th	347	132^nd	132	18^th	18	14^th	14
2021-22	1^st	1	154^th	154	--	--	10^th	10	1^st	1	322^nd	322	33^rd	33	148^th	148	70^th	70	1^st	1	6^th	6	65^th	65	13^th	13	27^th	27	353^rd	353	242^nd	242	1^st	1	1^st	1
2020-21	13^th	13	195^th	195	--	--	11^th	11	49^th	49	155^th	155	165^th	165	292^nd	292	23^rd	23	3^rd	3	245^th	245	1^st	1	55^th	55	112^th	112	271^st	271	333^rd	333	8^th	8	20^th	20
2019-20	13^th	13	222^nd	222	--	--	27^th	27	33^rd	33	92^nd	92	33^rd	33	242^nd	242	69^th	69	34^th	34	86^th	86	6^th	6	72^nd	72	57^th	57	155^th	155	305^th	305	63^rd	63	122^nd	122
2018-19	1^st	1	140^th	140	--	--	13^th	13	1^st	1	156^th	156	3^rd	3	270^th	270	4^th	4	15^th	15	6^th	6	73^rd	73	127^th	127	5^th	5	244^th	244	309^th	309	29^th	29	37^th	37
2017-18	8^th	8	286^th	286	--	--	28^th	28	10^th	10	97^th	97	20^th	20	119^th	119	11^th	11	137^th	137	14^th	14	90^th	90	152^nd	152	88^th	88	157^th	157	170^th	170	194^th	194	189^th	189
2016-17	51^st	51	93^rd	93	--	--	37^th	37	55^th	55	324^th	324	120^th	120	126^th	126	224^th	224	4^th	4	64^th	64	8^th	8	3^rd	3	10^th	10	343^rd	343	180^th	180	11^th	11	6^th	6
2015-16	81^st	81	62^nd	62	--	--	199^th	199	68^th	68	318^th	318	182^nd	182	106^th	106	45^th	45	138^th	138	59^th	59	172^nd	172	77^th	77	68^th	68	313^th	313	101^st	101	123^rd	123	59^th	59
2014-15	150^th	150	137^th	137	--	--	134^th	134	149^th	149	321^st	321	184^th	184	52^nd	52	186^th	186	106^th	106	162^nd	162	297^th	297	42^nd	42	125^th	125	332^nd	332	53^rd	53	113^th	113	47^th	47