TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Texas Tech  27-10 (0.730)  |  Big 12
All-Play Percentage: 0.949 (19th)
Schedule Strength: 0.726 (30th)
Record Quality: 0.431 (16th)
Avg. Season Rank: 20.42 (16th)
Pace: 68.16 (291st)
Momentum: 1.03 (120th)
Off. Momentum: 0.34 (167th)
Def. Momentum: 0.69 (103rd)
Consistency: -8.35 (94th)
Res. Consistency: -10.52 (92nd)
Away From Home: -0.79 (211th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.79 (166th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 111.47 32.47 70.43 83.10 47.18 27.59 36.92 21.63 38.71 33.89 60.94 12.63 17.99 9.43 33.20 26.03 40.78 1.92
RANK: 46th 8th 223rd 116th 58th 277th 90th 210th 104th 22nd 127th 69th 39th 23rd 289th 226th 28th 33rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 90.30 28.80 -- 77.72 39.09 28.83 31.57 21.17 32.22 27.72 52.14 9.90 14.36 5.96 37.10 27.23 35.67 2.01
RANK: 8th 286th -- 28th 10th 97th 20th 119th 11th 137th 14th 90th 152nd 88th 157th 170th 194th 189th

ANALYSIS:
When listing some of the better squads you will find in NCAA basketball this year, one can definitely make a case for Texas Tech. Carrying a record of 27-10, they are currently rated #19 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of 10) in the Big 12 (average ranking 38.9).

The Texas Tech defense will be extremely problematic for most opposing offenses. Allowing about 90 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, the club is ranked eighth overall in defensive efficiency. Texas Tech will wreak havoc with many opponents' shooting percentages this year. And it doesn't really matter where the shots originate; the team ranks in the top-25 in each of the four major defensive shooting categories. They allow AO to make just 31.6% of their three-pointers (20th in the nation), 32.2% of their mid-range shots (11th), 52.1% of their near-proximity attempts (14th), and 39.1% of their total shots from the field (tenth). Texas Tech also does a really good job to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 28th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 77.72 vs. AO.

Texas Tech plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 46th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 111 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas Tech does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 32.47 vs. AO, they are ranked eighth in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 70.4%. Texas Tech also does an outstanding job finishing any scoring chances they obtain from offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 9.4% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 23rd nationally), and with a rating of 17.99, they're 39th in potential points scored off of the offensive glass as well.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Texas Tech does worse vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 7.12%, Texas Tech performs above average 31% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 91% of the time.
Texas Tech performs worse against squads that tend to get off more shots. When facing teams that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 83.16, Texas Tech is more efficient than normal 32% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 83% of the time.
When playing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Texas Tech usually performs worse than average. Texas Tech is more efficient than normal 32% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 107.26. In all other contests, Texas Tech performs better than average 83% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2510th10th25th12thBig 12239th138th30th244th203rd13th
2023-2442nd42nd56th35thBig 12225th202nd48th271st247th33rd
2022-2358th58th193rd121stBig 12235th313th44th351st79th41st
2021-224th4th42nd19thBig 12220th251st29th106th353rd17th
2020-2113th13th102nd54thBig 12317th122nd70th333rd272nd9th
2019-2019th19th131st75thBig 12262nd322nd60th52nd159th21st
2018-192nd2nd14th6thBig 12272nd345th33rd25th125th11th
2017-1819th19th36th16thBig 12291st94th30th166th211th16th
2016-1733rd33rd134th81stBig 12327th244th63rd325th339th32nd
2015-1651st51st121st48thBig 12314th268th11th309th322nd37th
2014-15160th160th249th177thBig 12323rd261st74th346th350th143rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-258th137th70th2nd50th18th50th137th20th214th41st155th16th60th75th191st308th324th
2023-2429th88th11th74th89th65th84th196th130th206th79th106th140th116th81st221st236th279th
2022-2348th127th162nd86th51st205th60th203rd287th57th51st80th154th46th244th222nd81st92nd
2021-2221st42nd235th166th10th271st92nd236th82nd21st13th15th79th17th276th243rd20th36th
2020-2119th14th109th13th85th298th32nd12th224th99th93rd60th65th165th332nd30th190th60th
2019-2026th147th29th160th19th199th13th124th134th181st21st36th303rd207th211th129th173rd158th
2018-1912th86th57th158th6th211th4th81st50th237th6th106th265th156th209th73rd250th197th
2017-1846th8th223rd116th58th277th90th210th104th22nd127th69th39th23rd289th226th28th33rd
2016-1739th53rd100th107th42nd248th65th61st66th215th28th241st219th86th260th61st229th140th
2015-1634th37th45th69th66th282nd67th91st169th43rd96th122nd68th43rd303rd109th63rd39th
2014-15181st19th314th273rd183rd244th195th256th320th70th164th108th76th93rd224th240th56th80th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2522nd152nd--63rd33rd50th30th341st63rd38th60th13th32nd9th84th355th52nd149th
2023-2450th50th--188th69th209th43rd286th27th73rd247th22nd154th66th200th292nd68th94th
2022-2377th85th--214th38th353rd85th158th9th28th207th213th162nd124th347th132nd18th14th
2021-221st154th--10th1st322nd33rd148th70th1st6th65th13th27th353rd242nd1st1st
2020-2113th195th--11th49th155th165th292nd23rd3rd245th1st55th112th271st333rd8th20th
2019-2013th222nd--27th33rd92nd33rd242nd69th34th86th6th72nd57th155th305th63rd122nd
2018-191st140th--13th1st156th3rd270th4th15th6th73rd127th5th244th309th29th37th
2017-188th286th--28th10th97th20th119th11th137th14th90th152nd88th157th170th194th189th
2016-1751st93rd--37th55th324th120th126th224th4th64th8th3rd10th343rd180th11th6th
2015-1681st62nd--199th68th318th182nd106th45th138th59th172nd77th68th313th101st123rd59th
2014-15150th137th--134th149th321st184th52nd186th106th162nd297th42nd125th332nd53rd113th47th