TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 UTEP  17-15 (0.531)  |  Conference USA
All-Play Percentage: 0.472 (187th)
Schedule Strength: 0.496 (168th)
Record Quality: -0.007 (184th)
Avg. Season Rank: 163.52 (162nd)
Pace: 69.03 (212th)
Momentum: 1.26 (114th)
Off. Momentum: 1.69 (108th)
Def. Momentum: -0.42 (155th)
Consistency: -6.15 (2nd)
Res. Consistency: -8.72 (15th)
Away From Home: 0.30 (130th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.90 (50th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.19 23.37 76.17 80.65 41.16 32.04 31.23 23.39 33.70 25.21 60.68 9.48 10.34 4.21 39.73 29.00 31.26 2.08
RANK: 254th 259th 31st 221st 278th 132nd 285th 147th 307th 295th 125th 263rd 302nd 248th 111th 135th 286th 273rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.24 27.49 -- 80.45 42.29 28.24 30.94 25.04 36.64 27.17 59.28 9.59 12.71 5.02 35.10 31.13 33.77 2.01
RANK: 108th 264th -- 108th 116th 79th 52nd 279th 155th 110th 178th 56th 150th 177th 78th 300th 134th 210th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, UTEP is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. Ranked 187th overall (out of 353) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 17-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #8 team (out of 14) in Conference USA (average ranking 174.7).

Based on their performances this year, UTEP will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 96 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #108 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. UTEP owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 52nd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 30.9% of their attempts from afar.

The offense for UTEP, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 254th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 94 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UTEP needs improvement when it comes to draining the mid-range shot. The team is ranked 307th in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 33.7% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. If UTEP does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's outstanding shooting at the charity stripe. The squad makes 76.2% of their free throw attempts, which ranks #31 in Division I.

UTEP is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked second in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UTEP does worse vs. clubs that do not defend well on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.82%, UTEP performs above average 18% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 78% of the time.
UTEP performs worse against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.78, UTEP is more efficient than normal 20% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 74% of the time.
When playing teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities, UTEP usually performs better than average. UTEP is more efficient than normal 90% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 81.52. In all other contests, UTEP performs better than average 37% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Monarchs Respond
(2/9/2020 4:24:00 AM) NORFOLK, Va. – Five Monarchs scored in double-figures as the Old Dominion men's basketball team (10-15, 6-6 C-USA) cruised to a 72-53 victory over UTEP (13-12, 4-8 C-USA) on Saturday night at Chartway Arena in front of 6,820 fans. Kalu Ezikpe (15 points ...
Maitre scores 14 to lift FAU past UTEP 59-56
(1/4/2020 7:37:00 PM) BOCA RATON, Fla. — Richardson Maitre posted 14 points as Florida Atlantic extended its home win streak to nine games, narrowly beating UTEP 59-56 on Saturday. Madiaw Niang gave the Owls the lead on a three-point play with 41 seconds left and Maitre extended the lead with a pair of free throws with 18 seconds to go. Bryson Williams missed a 3 ...
Andrews scores 16 to lift FIU past UTEP 69-67
(1/2/2020 3:26:00 PM) MIAMI (AP) — Devon Andrews posted 16 points and Osasumwen Osaghae set a program record for blocked shots as Florida International beat UTEP 69-67 on Thursday in the first Conference USA matchup of the season for both teams. Osaghae entered needing two blocks to tie the FIU record held by Adrian Diaz (192) and he finished with 12 points and ...
Houston upsets No. 21 Washington to win Diamond Head Classic
(12/25/2019 11:26:00 PM) Derrick Alston had a game-high 23 points along with nine rebounds and six assists to lead Boise State (8-5) to a 72-67 victory over UTEP in the fifth-place game. — Ishmael El-Amin scored 15 of his 18 points in the second half and Luke Bumbalough added 14 points as Ball State topped Portland 61-46 for seventh place.
Buggs, da Silva help Hawaii beat UTEP 67-63
(12/23/2019 7:10:00 PM) HONOLULU (AP) — Bernardo da Silva came off the bench to score 17 points and Drew Buggs scored five points in the final 39 seconds to lift Hawaii to a 67-63 win over UTEP in the Diamond Head Classic on Sunday night, the Rainbow Warriors' seventh consecutive home victory. Buggs finished with nine points and eight assists. Samuta Avea had 16 ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25160th160th155th132ndConference USA98th21st111th136th155th133rd
2023-24180th180th178th191stConference USA73rd26th163rd83rd131st214th
2022-23174th174th242nd213thConference USA145th247th119th47th217th187th
2021-22174th174th135th138thConference USA169th188th168th176th58th180th
2020-21120th118th179th186thConference USA218th343rd114th238th327th142nd
2019-20187th187th166th184thConference USA212th2nd168th50th130th162nd
2018-19317th317th325th317thConference USA108th199th209th144th217th266th
2017-18234th234th282nd250thConference USA218th294th145th142nd326th239th
2016-17199th199th207th219thConference USA269th290th226th40th54th260th
2015-16213th213th131st174thConference USA34th113th293rd68th110th236th
2014-15101st101st64th79thConference USA165th166th175th236th289th75th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25201st81st222nd279th177th306th91st193rd328th104th203rd15th287th219th283rd179th78th61st
2023-24302nd64th314th346th240th330th316th157th290th156th167th2nd251st264th308th123rd92nd54th
2022-23292nd83rd351st273rd176th349th350th72nd251st86th125th16th40th17th348th53rd61st16th
2021-22223rd284th37th146th221st183rd182nd32nd143rd336th147th45th305th310th193rd35th341st297th
2020-21145th143rd50th65th236th157th253rd35th167th314th134th65th283rd340th201st39th337th275th
2019-20254th259th31st221st278th132nd285th147th307th295th125th263rd302nd248th111th135th286th273rd
2018-19347th221st320th331st341st247th344th39th262nd345th282nd324th207th228th193rd22nd342nd286th
2017-18298th287th323rd239th219th194th293rd75th172nd310th91st298th288th188th171st65th304th253rd
2016-17250th212th332nd335th72nd336th197th42nd29th309th54th237th345th323rd310th20th271st127th
2015-16178th106th287th318th94th275th159th146th87th226th102nd152nd293rd289th246th110th162nd119th
2014-15116th25th255th303rd82nd286th57th190th281st130th65th239th203rd74th258th161st78th75th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25146th294th--42nd186th207th90th121st283rd91st253rd276th279th314th274th164th130th107th
2023-2468th334th--1st272nd13th143rd94th165th54th334th274th19th86th96th231st207th246th
2022-2384th249th--6th220th81st220th95th87th59th308th191st130th83rd203rd196th161st163rd
2021-2297th301st--21st201st29th205th160th163rd177th175th71st254th95th70th230th267th291st
2020-21104th334th--13th153rd16th235th258th292nd90th33rd23rd239th96th51st318th167th259th
2019-20108th264th--108th116th79th52nd279th155th110th178th56th150th177th78th300th134th210th
2018-19135th200th--136th161st88th296th348th308th19th111th219th89th61st96th349th18th91st
2017-18154th285th--154th119th288th126th227th155th56th184th170th68th70th296th234th58th47th
2016-17127th206th--114th109th321st161st249th237th5th198th221st32nd60th330th270th8th8th
2015-16221st256th--186th182nd302nd230th181st255th76th193rd100th326th243rd297th184th71st48th
2014-1581st80th--273rd87th133rd101st305th88th182nd94th151st209th121st97th278th141st202nd