TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Tenn. Tech  5-22 (0.185)  |  Ohio Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.084 (327th)
Schedule Strength: 0.465 (202nd)
Record Quality: -0.355 (334th)
Avg. Season Rank: 320.82 (328th)
Pace: 70.81 (120th)
Momentum: 1.63 (102nd)
Off. Momentum: 2.91 (30th)
Def. Momentum: -1.28 (228th)
Consistency: -8.17 (76th)
Res. Consistency: -12.21 (182nd)
Away From Home: -0.50 (231st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.73 (236th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 92.49 20.19 68.97 81.07 41.87 34.54 30.93 19.69 38.42 26.84 58.48 11.52 11.47 2.91 42.61 24.29 33.10 2.10
RANK: 283rd 334th 246th 221st 260th 63rd 303rd 274th 164th 222nd 194th 149th 245th 342nd 54th 274th 215th 286th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.91 22.85 -- 83.31 48.60 31.50 36.39 21.87 41.39 29.95 66.71 11.40 12.75 5.63 37.81 26.25 35.95 2.02
RANK: 323rd 105th -- 227th 342nd 217th 288th 117th 275th 252nd 347th 201st 183rd 256th 201st 101st 239th 201st

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, Tenn. Tech likely fits the bill. Haslametrics has them ranked 327th overall (out of 357) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 5-22. They are also ranked by this site as the #10 team (out of 12) in the OVC (average ranking 240.7).

Tenn. Tech does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #323 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 109 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Tenn. Tech fares terribly when attempting to stop opponents from converting from the inside. The team is ranked 347th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 66.7% of their attempts from close-up. Tenn. Tech is also one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #342 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 48.6% of their total attempts from the floor.

Tenn. Tech doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 92 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #283 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Tenn. Tech does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 2.9% of all second-chance opportunities (342nd nationally). Tenn. Tech also does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 20.19 vs. AO, they are 334th in the overall rankings for that category.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Tenn. Tech usually performs worse than average. Tenn. Tech is more efficient than normal 25% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 100.66. In all other contests, Tenn. Tech performs better than average 74% of the time.
Tenn. Tech is typically better vs. teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively. Against foes that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 98.67, Tenn. Tech performs above their norm 74% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 25% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Tenn. Tech often performs worse than normal. Tenn. Tech is more efficient than usual 33% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.99. In their other contests, Tenn. Tech performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Freeman carries Tennessee St. past Tennessee Tech 91-86 - USA TODAY
(2/19/2021 12:05:07 AM) Mark Freeman had 22 points and 13 assists as Tennessee State narrowly beat Tennessee Tech 91-86
Freeman carries Tennessee St. past Tennessee Tech 91-86 - The Philadelphia Inquirer
(2/18/2021 11:44:04 PM) Mark Freeman had 22 points and 13 assists as Tennessee State narrowly beat Tennessee Tech 91-86
Freeman carries Tennessee St. past Tennessee Tech 91-86 - WTOP
(2/18/2021 11:43:04 PM) NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Mark Freeman had 22 points and 13 assists as Tennessee State narrowly defeated Tennessee Tech 91-86 on Thursday night. Monty Johal had 16 points for Tennessee State (4-16…
Tennessee Tech vs. Tennessee State - Game Recap - February 18, 2021 - ESPN
(2/18/2021 11:31:44 PM) Get a recap of the Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles vs. Tennessee State Tigers basketball game.
Freeman carries Tennessee St. past Tennessee Tech 91-86
(2/18/2021 11:27:07 PM) NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Mark Freeman had 22 points and 13 assists as Tennessee State narrowly defeated Tennessee Tech 91-86 on Thursday night.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25284th284th218th287thOVC110th27th339th24th87th270th
2023-24330th330th312th329thOVC281st324th300th48th339th326th
2022-23255th255th207th283rdOVC197th144th333rd226th278th273rd
2021-22243rd243rd290th288thOVC47th177th204th92nd157th243rd
2020-21327th327th334th334thOVC120th76th202nd236th231st328th
2019-20327th327th310th323rdOVC220th219th255th133rd292nd334th
2018-19326th326th329th331stOVC110th53rd230th166th142nd340th
2017-18225th225th131st165thOVC50th108th231st157th195th212th
2016-17243rd243rd269th267thOVC121st29th224th7th21st269th
2015-16224th224th110th146thOVC112th267th218th312th337th194th
2014-15238th238th258th270thOVC90th191st212th121st271st222nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25294th346th266th217th284th66th157th248th194th288th307th207th275th321st54th246th282nd322nd
2023-24337th338th248th315th272nd280th277th223rd237th110th302nd302nd305th335th258th197th70th78th
2022-23222nd295th166th220th244th73rd30th178th131st331st322nd250th298th271st62nd169th329th334th
2021-22233rd319th344th80th163rd277th155th108th138th60th246th120th36th199th292nd123rd77th51st
2020-21283rd334th246th221st260th63rd303rd274th164th222nd194th149th245th342nd54th274th215th286th
2019-20330th343rd274th132nd336th48th231st285th345th179th329th146th178th226th52nd294th184th272nd
2018-19344th133rd343rd332nd338th317th288th99th332nd249th334th224th131st263rd280th60th193rd117th
2017-18286th88th274th241st308th237th286th224th335th85th297th43rd34th130th223rd218th68th86th
2016-17290th162nd150th264th303rd115th316th279th130th187th320th176th150th170th95th273rd156th220th
2015-16143rd92nd63rd289th181st64th135th307th36th236th277th193rd196th248th49th297th197th283rd
2014-15171st242nd190th48th191st229th244th89th23rd97th276th157th13th32nd255th113th146th105th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25258th25th--357th247th197th114th320th276th273rd291st199th314th342nd92nd272nd178th227th
2023-24321st74th--288th313th267th251st203rd189th190th355th343rd38th241st233rd175th154th141st
2022-23287th82nd--316th276th258th173rd138th217th305th299th211th342nd322nd211th80th266th216th
2021-22252nd56th--307th235th279th119th141st293rd265th272nd185th257th313th224th104th217th179th
2020-21323rd105th--227th342nd217th288th117th275th252nd347th201st183rd256th201st101st239th201st
2019-20304th108th--199th321st166th323rd234th311th138th310th281st243rd325th158th236th131st162nd
2018-19212th222nd--176th231st70th132nd188th296th286th176th351st348th344th62nd180th286th300th
2017-18148th261st--84th184th121st89th37th289th285th112th87th279th276th153rd39th304th276th
2016-17218th280th--61st221st199th183rd79th192nd156th239th165th257th306th248th90th196th157th
2015-16289th168th--311th259th258th297th98th298th306th122nd206th308th296th202nd54th270th234th
2014-15275th319th--63rd311th70th282nd6th286th336th170th283rd219th339th98th7th345th325th