TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Tenn. Tech  8-23 (0.258)  |  Ohio Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.077 (326th)
Schedule Strength: 0.444 (230th)
Record Quality: -0.370 (331st)
Avg. Season Rank: 334.65 (340th)
Pace: 69.61 (110th)
Momentum: 0.15 (169th)
Off. Momentum: -1.07 (269th)
Def. Momentum: 1.23 (82nd)
Consistency: -8.45 (53rd)
Res. Consistency: -12.46 (194th)
Away From Home: 0.22 (142nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.85 (166th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 87.82 27.03 64.02 78.88 39.09 27.57 32.07 23.29 30.96 28.02 52.77 10.61 14.22 5.10 34.96 29.52 35.52 1.99
RANK: 344th 133rd 343rd 332nd 338th 317th 288th 99th 332nd 249th 334th 224th 131st 263rd 280th 60th 193rd 117th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.63 27.06 -- 83.74 45.55 29.60 33.87 20.92 39.01 33.23 60.07 16.65 18.32 8.71 35.34 24.98 39.68 1.96
RANK: 212th 222nd -- 176th 231st 70th 132nd 188th 296th 286th 176th 351st 348th 344th 62nd 180th 286th 300th

ANALYSIS:
Tenn. Tech is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. Their record this season is 8-23, and the club is ranked 326th overall (out of 353) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the 12 schools in the OVC (average ranking 221.4), they're currently ranked as our #11 team in the conference.

Offense comes as a real struggle to Tenn. Tech this year. The team is rated tenth from the bottom in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 88 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Tenn. Tech tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 16.65, which ranks third from the bottom in D1. Tenn. Tech also has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 64.0% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #343 overall in free throw percentage. Tenn. Tech lastly shoots dreadfully from the floor and ranks in the bottom-25 in three of our four major field goal shooting categories. They are worse off shooting inside the three-point stripe, making good on just 31.0% of their mid-range jumpers (332nd in the nation), 52.8% of their near-proximity chances (334th), and 39.1% of their total shots from the field (338th) vs. AO.

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in defensive efficiency, Tenn. Tech isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Allowing roughly 106 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #212 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Tenn. Tech gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 18.32 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (sixth from the bottom nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 8.7% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked tenth from the bottom) as well.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Tenn. Tech is typically worse vs. teams that convert well from outside the arc. Against foes that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.08%, Tenn. Tech performs above their norm 22% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 65% of the time.
When facing teams that effectively clean the offensive glass, Tenn. Tech often performs better than normal. Tenn. Tech is more efficient than usual 69% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.36. In their other contests, Tenn. Tech performs better than the norm 31% of the time.
Tenn. Tech does worse vs. clubs that allow more chances at the line. When playing squads that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 24.49, Tenn. Tech performs above average 39% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 73% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Power Rankings: Kentucky's complete game is too much for Tennessee
(2/16/2019 11:06:00 PM) Tennessee came into Lexington ... remaining game on the schedule: at Texas Tech. The Red Raiders have won four in a row, but Kansas blew them out by 16 earlier this month in Lawrence. 12. Marquette Golden Eagles (21-4) Previous ranking: 12 This week ...
Tenn. Tech looks to end streak vs JSU
(2/13/2019 6:49:00 AM) BOTTOM LINE: Jacksonville State looks to extend Tennessee Tech’s conference losing streak ... 13.3 points and four rebounds per contest. The Golden Eagles have been led by Jr Clay and Courtney ...
Eagles ‘connect four,’ extend win streak
(1/25/2019 11:15:00 AM) The Morehead State men's basketball Eagles won their fourth straight contest, defeating Tennessee Tech in a slugfest, 67-61, Thursday night at Johnson Arena. With the win, the Eagles have won four in a row for the first time since the 2016-17 campaign.
No. 3 Tennessee heavily favored against Tennessee Tech
(12/29/2018 12:03:00 AM) Tennessee Tech is 1-23 alltime against Tennessee with the lone win occurring in 1996 in Knoxville. The Golden Eagles started 1-7, including big losses to North Carolina (108-58) and Michigan State (101-33) in Las Vegas last month in the Continental Tire ...
No. 3 Tennessee Has Tennessee Tech in Final Game Before SEC Play
(12/27/2018 5:30:00 PM) ... 25 points to lead the Tennessee basketball team to a 74-68 win over in-state foe Tennessee Tech Dec. 13, 2016, at Thompson-Boling Arena. • The win moved Tennessee's all-time record to 23-1 against the Golden Eagles and extended UT's home win streak ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25284th283rd218th286thOVC112th29th339th25th87th270th
2023-24330th330th312th329thOVC281st324th300th48th339th326th
2022-23255th255th207th283rdOVC197th144th333rd226th278th273rd
2021-22243rd243rd290th288thOVC47th177th204th92nd157th243rd
2020-21327th327th334th334thOVC120th76th202nd236th231st328th
2019-20327th327th310th323rdOVC220th219th255th133rd292nd334th
2018-19326th326th329th331stOVC110th53rd230th166th142nd340th
2017-18225th225th131st165thOVC50th108th231st157th195th212th
2016-17243rd243rd269th267thOVC121st29th224th7th21st269th
2015-16224th224th110th146thOVC112th267th218th312th337th194th
2014-15238th238th258th270thOVC90th191st212th121st271st222nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25293rd347th266th218th284th66th157th248th197th291st305th207th278th321st54th245th283rd323rd
2023-24337th338th248th315th272nd280th277th223rd237th110th302nd302nd305th335th258th197th70th78th
2022-23222nd295th166th220th244th73rd30th178th131st331st322nd250th298th271st62nd169th329th334th
2021-22233rd319th344th80th163rd277th155th108th138th60th246th120th36th199th292nd123rd77th51st
2020-21283rd334th246th221st260th63rd303rd274th164th222nd194th149th245th342nd54th274th215th286th
2019-20330th343rd274th132nd336th48th231st285th345th179th329th146th178th226th52nd294th184th272nd
2018-19344th133rd343rd332nd338th317th288th99th332nd249th334th224th131st263rd280th60th193rd117th
2017-18286th88th274th241st308th237th286th224th335th85th297th43rd34th130th223rd218th68th86th
2016-17290th162nd150th264th303rd115th316th279th130th187th320th176th150th170th95th273rd156th220th
2015-16143rd92nd63rd289th181st64th135th307th36th236th277th193rd196th248th49th297th197th283rd
2014-15171st242nd190th48th191st229th244th89th23rd97th276th157th13th32nd255th113th146th105th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25257th25th--357th247th197th113th321st275th274th290th201st314th342nd90th272nd178th231st
2023-24321st74th--288th313th267th251st203rd189th190th355th343rd38th241st233rd175th154th141st
2022-23287th82nd--316th276th258th173rd138th217th305th299th211th342nd322nd211th80th266th216th
2021-22252nd56th--307th235th279th119th141st293rd265th272nd185th257th313th224th104th217th179th
2020-21323rd105th--227th342nd217th288th117th275th252nd347th201st183rd256th201st101st239th201st
2019-20304th108th--199th321st166th323rd234th311th138th310th281st243rd325th158th236th131st162nd
2018-19212th222nd--176th231st70th132nd188th296th286th176th351st348th344th62nd180th286th300th
2017-18148th261st--84th184th121st89th37th289th285th112th87th279th276th153rd39th304th276th
2016-17218th280th--61st221st199th183rd79th192nd156th239th165th257th306th248th90th196th157th
2015-16289th168th--311th259th258th297th98th298th306th122nd206th308th296th202nd54th270th234th
2014-15275th319th--63rd311th70th282nd6th286th336th170th283rd219th339th98th7th345th325th