TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 UT Martin  12-19 (0.387)  |  Ohio Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.142 (303rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.443 (231st)
Record Quality: -0.202 (273rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 309.01 (314th)
Pace: 69.02 (144th)
Momentum: -2.00 (259th)
Off. Momentum: 1.30 (119th)
Def. Momentum: -3.30 (318th)
Consistency: -10.39 (271st)
Res. Consistency: -13.45 (246th)
Away From Home: -1.06 (275th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.53 (332nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.77 21.77 75.85 86.80 42.30 32.74 33.07 23.07 33.18 30.99 58.84 13.04 15.02 7.19 37.71 26.58 35.71 2.02
RANK: 204th 316th 32nd 40th 247th 159th 252nd 107th 281st 144th 195th 82nd 99th 58th 202nd 138th 184th 163rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 116.08 25.08 -- 85.78 49.34 36.23 37.97 19.14 41.82 30.41 67.62 13.34 16.17 8.55 42.24 22.31 35.45 2.07
RANK: 347th 132nd -- 269th 347th 324th 321st 96th 338th 169th 346th 290th 319th 343rd 310th 73rd 134th 81st

ANALYSIS:
UT Martin presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. Carrying a record of 12-19, they are currently rated #303 overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 12 schools in the OVC (average ranking 221.4), they're currently ranked as our #9 team in the conference.

UT Martin has a very sieve-like defense that gives up points way too easily. The team is ranked seventh from the bottom in efficiency on that end of the court and gives up more than 116 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UT Martin can be counted on to make some of the inferior shooting teams look pretty capable. The team ranks in the bottom-50 in each of the four major defensive field goal shooting categories. They allow AO to make 38.0% of their three-pointers (33rd-worst in the nation), 41.8% of their mid-range jumpers (16th-worst), 67.6% of their near-proximity chances (eighth-worst), and 49.3% of their total shots from the field (seventh-worst). UT Martin is also one of the very worst teams in the game when it comes to preventing opponents from scoring off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 8.6% of all second-chance opportunities (343rd nationally), and with a rating of 16.17, they're 319th in potential points surrendered off of the offensive boards as well.

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in offensive efficiency, UT Martin isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Scoring roughly 101 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #204 in the nation in offensive efficiency. UT Martin struggles to draw fouls and earn opportunities at the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 21.77 vs. AO, they are 316th in the overall rankings for that category. If UT Martin does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's outstanding shooting at the charity stripe. The squad makes 75.9% of their free throw attempts, which ranks #32 in Division I.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UT Martin is typically worse vs. teams that favor a faster tempo. Against foes that have a pace vs. AO greater than 69.61, UT Martin performs above their norm 33% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 88% of the time.
When facing teams that are typically efficient on offense, UT Martin often performs worse than normal. UT Martin is more efficient than usual 47% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 97.14. In their other contests, UT Martin performs better than the norm 100% of the time.
UT Martin does better vs. clubs that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When playing squads that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 106.68, UT Martin performs above average 92% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 44% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Ja Morant’s Murray State Mixtape Tour Is a College Basketball Miracle
(2/14/2019 6:15:00 AM) Here he is dunking on the Tennessee-Martin Skyhawks: Here he is dunking on the Eastern Illinois ... Morant’s 2018-19 season is a college basketball miracle. Over the past few months, the 6-foot-3 guard has emerged as a projected top-five pick in June ...
EKU men's basketball defeat UT Martin in OVC home opener
(1/18/2019 8:30:00 AM) After starting Ohio Valley Conference play 0-4, EKU men’s basketball rolled over University of Tennessee-Martin on Thursday night by a final ... Eastern only turned the ball over 13 times against the Skyhawks. “We took care of the ball today.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25266th265th256th313thOVC251st354th335th126th83rd265th
2023-24213th212th74th171stOVC9th45th305th248th109th225th
2022-23279th279th130th254thOVC28th236th354th145th209th295th
2021-22295th294th324th323rdOVC129th8th191st11th164th310th
2020-21349th349th284th312thOVC258th309th258th277th318th350th
2019-20329th329th304th324thOVC153rd40th248th172nd188th320th
2018-19303rd303rd265th273rdOVC144th271st231st332nd275th314th
2017-18289th289th300th325thOVC250th137th286th56th68th281st
2016-17232nd232nd82nd142ndOVC102nd311th266th189th192nd223rd
2015-16194th194th138th179thOVC182nd336th243rd99th203rd239th
2014-15145th144th99th137thOVC229th268th186th280th103rd141st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25233rd174th284th113th319th23rd265th293rd259th230th291st67th69th280th28th303rd253rd330th
2023-24180th230th24th94th263rd104th146th178th346th187th199th248th94th125th122nd189th219th243rd
2022-23248th110th206th245th237th238th321st173rd183rd201st165th102nd242nd261st222nd158th193rd159th
2021-22279th251st251st59th313th192nd313th125th352nd114th201st131st192nd248th225th155th150th131st
2020-21339th330th170th109th349th189th262nd26th350th335th233rd168th128th172nd209th28th342nd276th
2019-20162nd143rd53rd146th224th116th258th181st221st204th155th334th71st65th126th192nd216th235th
2018-19204th316th32nd40th247th159th252nd107th281st144th195th82nd99th58th202nd138th184th163rd
2017-18312th349th142nd131st251st193rd325th33rd112th314th140th251st168th196th207th37th319th250th
2016-17203rd272nd204th145th201st93rd246th205th262nd218th93rd148th28th112th103rd207th222nd243rd
2015-16181st237th88th207th192nd118th235th233rd83rd207th184th123rd204th195th112th223rd203rd244th
2014-15102nd333rd92nd82nd111th61st24th210th140th170th185th224th260th211th85th237th207th241st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25262nd234th--143rd228th362nd255th16th333rd23rd293rd260th223rd323rd363rd13th26th3rd
2023-24270th61st--354th173rd351st194th316th181st20th336th74th210th256th336th283rd5th7th
2022-23286th281st--268th219th341st82nd76th136th178th356th264th345th326th326th47th140th60th
2021-22297th348th--234th206th187th151st271st228th145th263rd180th199th237th175th265th118th157th
2020-21347th345th--69th346th273rd326th90th312th89th354th354th261st325th309th112th107th60th
2019-20351st142nd--323rd351st345th347th84th328th197th353rd333rd311th342nd334th40th120th44th
2018-19347th132nd--269th347th324th321st96th338th169th346th290th319th343rd310th73rd134th81st
2017-18226th248th--232nd114th350th184th156th80th17th273rd213th265th215th349th135th16th1st
2016-17263rd85th--204th262nd335th216th138th336th38th317th262nd301st317th335th127th37th11th
2015-16192nd40th--264th157th350th179th183rd297th9th271st170th223rd212th349th162nd8th4th
2014-15186th26th--260th193rd324th195th279th230th22nd324th208th8th46th311th257th15th15th