Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 UT Martin 10-21 (0.323) | Ohio Valley

All-Play Percentage: 0.177 (289^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.395 (286^th)	Record Quality: -0.340 (325^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 278.82 (281^st)
Pace: 68.84 (250^th)	Momentum: -1.63 (247^th)	Off. Momentum: -2.72 (327^th)	Def. Momentum: 1.10 (85^th)
Consistency: -8.74 (137^th)	Res. Consistency: -12.09 (206^th)	Away From Home: 0.63 (68^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 0.49 (56^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

93.37

18.99

72.54

82.83

42.40

29.93

31.24

28.50

38.51

24.40

60.62

9.50

14.86

6.32

36.13

34.41

29.45

2.07

RANK:

312^th

349^th

142^nd

131^st

251^st

193^rd

325^th

33^rd

112^th

314^th

140^th

251^st

168^th

196^th

207^th

37^th

319^th

250^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

105.46

27.90

83.29

43.12

38.29

35.60

22.08

35.03

22.92

63.48

11.29

15.92

7.21

45.97

26.52

27.52

2.18

RANK:

226^th

248^th

232^nd

114^th

350^th

184^th

156^th

80^th

17^th

273^rd

213^th

265^th

215^th

349^th

135^th

16^th

1^st

ANALYSIS:
Not one of the better ball-clubs in college basketball, UT Martin should be a fairly easy win for most capable opponents. They have a record of 10-21 and are ranked 289th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 12) in the OVC (average ranking 222.0).

UT Martin is not one of the most productive teams on offense. Scoring fewer than 94 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are rated at #312 in offensive efficiency. UT Martin does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 18.99 vs. AO, they are third from the bottom in the overall rankings for that category. UT Martin also won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 325th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 31.2% of their attempts from long vs. AO.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, UT Martin still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 105 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #226 in the nation in defensive efficiency. UT Martin does not stand out in a positive manner when they're asked to defend in the paint. The team is ranked 273rd in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 63.5% of their attempts from close-up. On a positive note, AO will take nowhere near as many inside shots as they typically would and, as a result, only 27.5% of AO's field goal attempts will come from short-distance.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Fri 11/10/2017	@ Marshall₁₁₆	L 66.04 - 82.65	L 91-102 (OT)	0-1	91.35	111.33	▲ 19.98	108.36	120.82	▼ 12.46	▲ 7.52
Sun 11/12/2017	@ Illinois₈₁	L 61.60 - 80.50	L 74-77	0-2	90.76	95.94	▲ 5.18	112.65	93.98	▲ 18.67	▲ 23.85
Wed 11/15/2017	vs NC Central₃₂₁	W 66.21 - 60.85	W 74-57	1-2	99.27	122.22	▲ 22.95	94.73	64.77	▲ 29.96	▲ 52.91
Sat 11/18/2017	@ Akron₂₄₁	L 64.99 - 71.12	L 59-76	1-3	97.39	102.27	▲ 4.88	101.49	126.54	▼ 25.05	▼ 20.17
Wed 11/22/2017	@ Southern₃₂₇	W 67.09 - 66.09	L 66-69	1-4	98.66	100.78	▲ 2.12	92.45	100.72	▼ 8.27	▼ 6.15
Sun 11/26/2017	vs UMKC₂₇₇	W 69.95 - 67.47	L 55-65	1-5	97.40	70.46	▼ 26.94	98.37	111.04	▼ 12.67	▼ 39.61
Wed 11/29/2017	@ LSU₆₇	L 61.44 - 81.64	L 60-84	1-6	91.48	89.43	▼ 2.05	115.20	120.71	▼ 5.51	▼ 7.56
Sat 12/2/2017	@ Chattanooga₂₈₇	L 64.80 - 67.89	L 63-66	1-7	99.05	96.30	▼ 2.75	98.69	93.38	▲ 5.31	▲ 2.56
Tue 12/5/2017	@ Arkansas State₂₈₅	L 70.73 - 74.09	W 92-78	2-7	103.49	126.21	▲ 22.72	103.57	103.36	▲ 0.21	▲ 22.93
Sun 12/10/2017	vs Cincinnati-Clermont	---	W 127-92	3-7	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 12/16/2017	@ Miss. State₆₂	L 57.32 - 77.41	L 61-92	3-8	87.65	94.86	▲ 7.21	111.94	140.32	▼ 28.38	▼ 21.17
Wed 12/20/2017	vs Blue Mountain College	---	W 84-76	4-8	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 12/22/2017	vs AR-Pine Bluff₃₂₆	W 69.41 - 62.49	W 74-68	5-8	97.55	113.36	▲ 15.81	91.51	110.21	▼ 18.70	▼ 2.89
Thu 12/28/2017	vs Tennessee St.₂₂₈	L 62.83 - 63.90	W 63-60 (OT)	6-8	92.09	89.53	▼ 2.56	97.87	92.59	▲ 5.28	▲ 2.72
Sat 12/30/2017	vs Belmont₇₆	L 63.65 - 76.44	L 58-65	6-9	92.26	92.81	▲ 0.55	114.97	110.60	▲ 4.37	▲ 4.92
Thu 1/4/2018	@ Austin Peay₁₉₂	L 65.11 - 75.04	L 69-75	6-10	95.50	100.84	▲ 5.34	104.08	103.36	▲ 0.72	▲ 6.06
Sat 1/6/2018	@ Murray State₇₄	L 58.82 - 77.97	L 68-82	6-11	89.37	80.84	▼ 8.53	112.12	125.00	▼ 12.88	▼ 21.41
Thu 1/11/2018	vs E. Kentucky₂₉₉	W 72.71 - 68.72	L 70-78	6-12	102.65	92.33	▼ 10.32	101.04	107.67	▼ 6.63	▼ 16.95
Sat 1/13/2018	vs Morehead State₃₀₂	W 70.48 - 66.51	L 67-71	6-13	99.87	93.44	▼ 6.43	97.92	103.70	▼ 5.78	▼ 12.21
Thu 1/18/2018	@ E. Illinois₂₆₄	L 62.67 - 67.17	L 60-80	6-14	96.68	78.33	▼ 18.35	98.17	100.51	▼ 2.34	▼ 20.69
Sat 1/20/2018	@ SIUE₃₀₇	L 68.01 - 69.68	W 70-69	7-14	100.26	111.64	▲ 11.38	97.72	107.25	▼ 9.53	▲ 1.85
Thu 1/25/2018	@ Jacksonville St.₁₄₈	L 58.39 - 70.57	W 67-63	8-14	88.30	92.81	▲ 4.51	100.64	78.50	▲ 22.14	▲ 26.65
Sat 1/27/2018	@ Tenn. Tech₂₂₅	L 64.32 - 71.77	L 55-63	8-15	92.80	86.88	▼ 5.92	98.23	90.38	▲ 7.85	▲ 1.93
Thu 2/1/2018	vs Austin Peay₁₉₂	L 68.21 - 72.02	L 57-59	8-16	95.50	78.01	▼ 17.49	104.08	86.56	▲ 17.52	▲ 0.03
Sat 2/3/2018	vs Murray State₇₄	L 61.82 - 74.89	L 53-66	8-17	89.37	80.54	▼ 8.83	112.12	100.73	▲ 11.39	▲ 2.56
Thu 2/8/2018	@ E. Kentucky₂₉₉	L 69.62 - 71.83	W 70-69	9-17	102.65	108.33	▲ 5.68	101.04	100.72	▲ 0.32	▲ 6.00
Sat 2/10/2018	vs SE Missouri St.₂₆₀	W 74.49 - 73.25	L 77-81 (OT)	9-18	104.06	108.18	▲ 4.12	106.67	114.39	▼ 7.72	▼ 3.60
Thu 2/15/2018	vs SIUE₃₀₇	W 71.09 - 66.61	L 69-70	9-19	100.26	97.73	▼ 2.53	97.72	103.72	▼ 6.00	▼ 8.53
Sat 2/17/2018	vs E. Illinois₂₆₄	W 65.62 - 64.25	L 57-64	9-20	96.68	89.67	▼ 7.01	98.17	103.86	▼ 5.69	▼ 12.70
Thu 2/22/2018	@ Morehead State₃₀₂	L 67.42 - 69.53	L 53-70	9-21	99.87	75.80	▼ 24.07	97.92	96.28	▲ 1.64	▼ 22.43
Sat 2/24/2018	@ SE Missouri St.₂₆₀	L 71.37 - 76.36	W 72-66	10-21	104.06	100.90	▼ 3.16	106.67	85.73	▲ 20.94	▲ 17.78
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When playing teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds, UT Martin usually performs worse than average. UT Martin is more efficient than normal 35% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.43. In all other contests, UT Martin performs better than average 89% of the time.
	UT Martin is typically better vs. teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.21%, UT Martin performs above their norm 71% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 25% of the time.
	When facing teams that shoot the ball well from the field, UT Martin often performs better than normal. UT Martin is more efficient than usual 65% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 41.41%. In their other contests, UT Martin performs better than the norm 22% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	266	0.270	14-19 (0.424)	0.424	-0.278	OVC	65.68	-11.95	0.276	-0.40	0.55	262.65
2023-24	213	0.416	21-11 (0.656)	0.656	0.013	OVC	72.23	-8.07	0.313	-1.64	0.56	225.56
2022-23	279	0.232	19-14 (0.576)	0.576	-0.138	OVC	71.06	-9.66	0.243	-0.40	-0.87	288.76
2021-22	295	0.179	8-22 (0.267)	0.267	-0.330	OVC	68.56	-7.43	0.415	2.02	0.12	304.43
2020-21	349	0.022	8-16 (0.333)	0.333	-0.283	OVC	68.20	-10.77	0.387	-2.40	-1.99	345.29
2019-20	329	0.068	9-20 (0.310)	0.310	-0.338	OVC	69.98	-7.89	0.403	-0.74	-0.39	309.15
2018-19	303	0.142	12-19 (0.387)	0.387	-0.202	OVC	69.02	-10.39	0.443	-3.53	-1.06	309.01
2017-18	289	0.177	10-21 (0.323)	0.323	-0.340	OVC	68.84	-8.74	0.395	0.49	0.63	278.82
2016-17	232	0.340	22-13 (0.629)	0.629	0.042	OVC	71.45	-10.18	0.409	-1.14	-0.36	222.19
2015-16	194	0.449	20-15 (0.571)	0.571	-0.022	OVC	69.56	-10.62	0.423	0.10	-0.23	229.50
2014-15	145	0.591	21-13 (0.618)	0.618	0.060	OVC	64.66	-10.01	0.477	-2.41	0.54	143.06

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	104.31	27.25	69.20	88.38	40.90	40.49	32.47	17.21	35.35	30.68	55.14	14.22	16.91	4.97	45.81	19.47	34.71	2.11
2023-24	105.27	25.24	77.10	87.20	42.39	33.87	35.12	22.74	33.32	30.59	57.17	10.19	15.19	6.05	38.84	26.07	35.08	2.04
2022-23	99.38	26.55	71.25	83.10	42.80	29.95	31.16	24.26	37.78	28.90	59.07	12.07	13.04	4.58	36.04	29.19	34.77	2.01
2021-22	95.13	23.05	69.49	86.91	40.21	30.43	30.33	25.99	31.10	30.48	57.83	11.41	12.94	4.29	35.02	29.91	35.07	2.00
2020-21	88.25	20.51	71.48	83.34	38.29	30.43	32.11	29.80	30.23	23.11	56.83	11.05	13.68	4.83	36.51	35.76	27.73	2.09
2019-20	99.77	26.17	75.29	82.47	42.29	32.32	31.94	22.48	35.88	27.67	59.58	7.80	14.93	6.07	39.19	27.26	33.55	2.06
2018-19	100.77	21.77	75.85	86.80	42.30	32.74	33.07	23.07	33.18	30.99	58.84	13.04	15.02	7.19	37.71	26.58	35.71	2.02
2017-18	93.37	18.99	72.54	82.83	42.40	29.93	31.24	28.50	38.51	24.40	60.62	9.50	14.86	6.32	36.13	34.41	29.45	2.07
2016-17	99.12	24.55	69.51	82.24	43.36	32.01	33.55	22.75	34.62	27.49	62.01	11.07	17.77	7.27	38.92	27.66	33.42	2.05
2015-16	100.06	26.74	72.26	81.35	43.29	30.55	33.74	22.70	37.55	28.11	58.30	11.47	14.43	6.47	37.55	27.90	34.55	2.03
2014-15	103.37	23.51	71.73	84.03	44.35	31.22	38.36	24.33	36.02	28.47	58.03	10.54	13.52	6.27	37.16	28.96	33.88	2.03

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	112.43	28.50	--	86.23	45.03	42.50	35.46	16.77	42.19	26.96	61.87	13.34	15.12	7.25	49.28	19.45	31.27	2.18
2023-24	109.85	23.29	--	90.78	44.11	37.94	34.70	26.76	38.96	26.08	63.10	9.98	13.72	6.05	41.79	29.48	28.73	2.13
2022-23	108.36	27.71	--	86.69	44.73	35.81	32.25	21.40	36.91	29.48	65.56	11.78	17.10	6.72	41.31	24.69	34.00	2.07
2021-22	108.05	31.07	--	85.53	44.14	30.93	32.73	26.38	38.86	28.22	61.58	10.77	13.74	5.39	36.17	30.84	33.00	2.03
2020-21	111.37	30.50	--	79.77	48.78	32.68	37.31	21.17	42.64	25.92	68.26	15.92	13.92	6.58	40.97	26.54	32.49	2.08
2019-20	117.34	24.45	--	85.88	49.93	36.90	38.19	20.22	42.32	28.76	70.34	13.81	15.15	7.24	42.97	23.54	33.49	2.09
2018-19	116.08	25.08	--	85.78	49.34	36.23	37.97	19.14	41.82	30.41	67.62	13.34	16.17	8.55	42.24	22.31	35.45	2.07
2017-18	105.46	27.90	--	83.29	43.12	38.29	35.60	22.08	35.03	22.92	63.48	11.29	15.92	7.21	45.97	26.52	27.52	2.18
2016-17	106.80	25.17	--	82.31	46.38	35.14	35.99	22.86	41.64	24.31	65.88	11.95	16.61	8.64	42.70	27.77	29.53	2.13
2015-16	103.45	24.06	--	84.35	43.67	37.31	34.96	24.14	38.92	22.90	62.89	10.82	15.84	7.19	44.23	28.62	27.15	2.17
2014-15	101.80	23.86	--	84.08	44.05	32.35	35.07	28.06	36.88	23.68	64.81	11.90	11.68	5.46	38.47	33.37	28.16	2.10

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	266^th	266	266^th	266	256^th	256	313^th	313	OVC	OVC	252^nd	252	354^th	354	336^th	336	126^th	126	83^rd	83	265^th	265
2023-24	213^th	213	212^th	212	74^th	74	171^st	171	OVC	OVC	9^th	9	45^th	45	305^th	305	248^th	248	109^th	109	225^th	225
2022-23	279^th	279	279^th	279	130^th	130	254^th	254	OVC	OVC	28^th	28	236^th	236	354^th	354	145^th	145	209^th	209	295^th	295
2021-22	295^th	295	294^th	294	324^th	324	323^rd	323	OVC	OVC	129^th	129	8^th	8	191^st	191	11^th	11	164^th	164	310^th	310
2020-21	349^th	349	349^th	349	284^th	284	312^th	312	OVC	OVC	258^th	258	309^th	309	258^th	258	277^th	277	318^th	318	350^th	350
2019-20	329^th	329	329^th	329	304^th	304	324^th	324	OVC	OVC	153^rd	153	40^th	40	248^th	248	172^nd	172	188^th	188	320^th	320
2018-19	303^rd	303	303^rd	303	265^th	265	273^rd	273	OVC	OVC	144^th	144	271^st	271	231^st	231	332^nd	332	275^th	275	314^th	314
2017-18	289^th	289	289^th	289	300^th	300	325^th	325	OVC	OVC	250^th	250	137^th	137	286^th	286	56^th	56	68^th	68	281^st	281
2016-17	232^nd	232	232^nd	232	82^nd	82	142^nd	142	OVC	OVC	102^nd	102	311^th	311	266^th	266	189^th	189	192^nd	192	223^rd	223
2015-16	194^th	194	194^th	194	138^th	138	179^th	179	OVC	OVC	182^nd	182	336^th	336	243^rd	243	99^th	99	203^rd	203	239^th	239
2014-15	145^th	145	144^th	144	99^th	99	137^th	137	OVC	OVC	229^th	229	268^th	268	186^th	186	280^th	280	103^rd	103	141^st	141

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	233^rd	233	174^th	174	284^th	284	112^th	112	319^th	319	23^rd	23	265^th	265	293^rd	293	258^th	258	229^th	229	291^st	291	71^st	71	70^th	70	279^th	279	29^th	29	303^rd	303	253^rd	253	330^th	330
2023-24	180^th	180	230^th	230	24^th	24	94^th	94	263^rd	263	104^th	104	146^th	146	178^th	178	346^th	346	187^th	187	199^th	199	248^th	248	94^th	94	125^th	125	122^nd	122	189^th	189	219^th	219	243^rd	243
2022-23	248^th	248	110^th	110	206^th	206	245^th	245	237^th	237	238^th	238	321^st	321	173^rd	173	183^rd	183	201^st	201	165^th	165	102^nd	102	242^nd	242	261^st	261	222^nd	222	158^th	158	193^rd	193	159^th	159
2021-22	279^th	279	251^st	251	251^st	251	59^th	59	313^th	313	192^nd	192	313^th	313	125^th	125	352^nd	352	114^th	114	201^st	201	131^st	131	192^nd	192	248^th	248	225^th	225	155^th	155	150^th	150	131^st	131
2020-21	339^th	339	330^th	330	170^th	170	109^th	109	349^th	349	189^th	189	262^nd	262	26^th	26	350^th	350	335^th	335	233^rd	233	168^th	168	128^th	128	172^nd	172	209^th	209	28^th	28	342^nd	342	276^th	276
2019-20	162^nd	162	143^rd	143	53^rd	53	146^th	146	224^th	224	116^th	116	258^th	258	181^st	181	221^st	221	204^th	204	155^th	155	334^th	334	71^st	71	65^th	65	126^th	126	192^nd	192	216^th	216	235^th	235
2018-19	204^th	204	316^th	316	32^nd	32	40^th	40	247^th	247	159^th	159	252^nd	252	107^th	107	281^st	281	144^th	144	195^th	195	82^nd	82	99^th	99	58^th	58	202^nd	202	138^th	138	184^th	184	163^rd	163
2017-18	312^th	312	349^th	349	142^nd	142	131^st	131	251^st	251	193^rd	193	325^th	325	33^rd	33	112^th	112	314^th	314	140^th	140	251^st	251	168^th	168	196^th	196	207^th	207	37^th	37	319^th	319	250^th	250
2016-17	203^rd	203	272^nd	272	204^th	204	145^th	145	201^st	201	93^rd	93	246^th	246	205^th	205	262^nd	262	218^th	218	93^rd	93	148^th	148	28^th	28	112^th	112	103^rd	103	207^th	207	222^nd	222	243^rd	243
2015-16	181^st	181	237^th	237	88^th	88	207^th	207	192^nd	192	118^th	118	235^th	235	233^rd	233	83^rd	83	207^th	207	184^th	184	123^rd	123	204^th	204	195^th	195	112^th	112	223^rd	223	203^rd	203	244^th	244
2014-15	102^nd	102	333^rd	333	92^nd	92	82^nd	82	111^th	111	61^st	61	24^th	24	210^th	210	140^th	140	170^th	170	185^th	185	224^th	224	260^th	260	211^th	211	85^th	85	237^th	237	207^th	207	241^st	241

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	262^nd	262	235^th	235	--	--	143^rd	143	226^th	226	362^nd	362	256^th	256	17^th	17	334^th	334	23^rd	23	292^nd	292	262^nd	262	225^th	225	323^rd	323	363^rd	363	13^th	13	26^th	26	3^rd	3
2023-24	270^th	270	61^st	61	--	--	354^th	354	173^rd	173	351^st	351	194^th	194	316^th	316	181^st	181	20^th	20	336^th	336	74^th	74	210^th	210	256^th	256	336^th	336	283^rd	283	5^th	5	7^th	7
2022-23	286^th	286	281^st	281	--	--	268^th	268	219^th	219	341^st	341	82^nd	82	76^th	76	136^th	136	178^th	178	356^th	356	264^th	264	345^th	345	326^th	326	326^th	326	47^th	47	140^th	140	60^th	60
2021-22	297^th	297	348^th	348	--	--	234^th	234	206^th	206	187^th	187	151^st	151	271^st	271	228^th	228	145^th	145	263^rd	263	180^th	180	199^th	199	237^th	237	175^th	175	265^th	265	118^th	118	157^th	157
2020-21	347^th	347	345^th	345	--	--	69^th	69	346^th	346	273^rd	273	326^th	326	90^th	90	312^th	312	89^th	89	354^th	354	354^th	354	261^st	261	325^th	325	309^th	309	112^th	112	107^th	107	60^th	60
2019-20	351^st	351	142^nd	142	--	--	323^rd	323	351^st	351	345^th	345	347^th	347	84^th	84	328^th	328	197^th	197	353^rd	353	333^rd	333	311^th	311	342^nd	342	334^th	334	40^th	40	120^th	120	44^th	44
2018-19	347^th	347	132^nd	132	--	--	269^th	269	347^th	347	324^th	324	321^st	321	96^th	96	338^th	338	169^th	169	346^th	346	290^th	290	319^th	319	343^rd	343	310^th	310	73^rd	73	134^th	134	81^st	81
2017-18	226^th	226	248^th	248	--	--	232^nd	232	114^th	114	350^th	350	184^th	184	156^th	156	80^th	80	17^th	17	273^rd	273	213^th	213	265^th	265	215^th	215	349^th	349	135^th	135	16^th	16	1^st	1
2016-17	263^rd	263	85^th	85	--	--	204^th	204	262^nd	262	335^th	335	216^th	216	138^th	138	336^th	336	38^th	38	317^th	317	262^nd	262	301^st	301	317^th	317	335^th	335	127^th	127	37^th	37	11^th	11
2015-16	192^nd	192	40^th	40	--	--	264^th	264	157^th	157	350^th	350	179^th	179	183^rd	183	297^th	297	9^th	9	271^st	271	170^th	170	223^rd	223	212^th	212	349^th	349	162^nd	162	8^th	8	4^th	4
2014-15	186^th	186	26^th	26	--	--	260^th	260	193^rd	193	324^th	324	195^th	195	279^th	279	230^th	230	22^nd	22	324^th	324	208^th	208	8^th	8	46^th	46	311^th	311	257^th	257	15^th	15	15^th	15