TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Missouri State  18-15 (0.545)  |  Missouri Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.631 (130th)
Schedule Strength: 0.540 (124th)
Record Quality: 0.087 (124th)
Avg. Season Rank: 105.09 (101st)
Pace: 68.52 (274th)
Momentum: -3.95 (321st)
Off. Momentum: 1.59 (101st)
Def. Momentum: -5.54 (348th)
Consistency: -9.69 (253rd)
Res. Consistency: -12.68 (241st)
Away From Home: 0.16 (116th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.05 (90th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.60 23.18 71.49 86.10 44.58 31.43 35.88 32.69 39.62 21.98 64.38 8.26 15.17 7.12 36.50 37.97 25.53 2.11
RANK: 121st 281st 182nd 22nd 154th 145th 135th 8th 70th 342nd 44th 307th 150th 132nd 189th 15th 350th 304th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.05 24.61 -- 86.81 42.24 33.38 33.60 32.31 38.27 21.12 61.96 11.21 15.03 6.90 38.45 37.22 24.33 2.14
RANK: 162nd 108th -- 335th 82nd 295th 82nd 351st 226th 4th 231st 207th 213th 183rd 228th 344th 2nd 12th

ANALYSIS:
Per this website's calculations, Missouri State is somewhere between an average to slightly above-average D1 ball-club. They have a record of 18-15 and are ranked 130th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of 10) in the MVC (average ranking 135.4).

Based on the data, Missouri State will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 105 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #121 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Missouri State loves taking the mid-range two, far more so than most other teams. The club is ranked 15th in ratio of mid-range attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to take that in-between shot, they can certainly make it, too. Currently rated in the top-75 in mid-range shooting percentage, they make roughly 39.6% of their attempts from that distance vs. AO. Missouri State is also one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked 22nd in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 86.10 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 44.6% of them vs. AO.

Missouri State plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 162nd nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 102 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Missouri State has had some success this season preventing opponents from converting many of their overall field goal attempts. The team ranks #82 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 42.2% of their total attempts from the floor. If Missouri State does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 86.81 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 17th-worst in college basketball.

Missouri State has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 321st in the country in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Missouri State does worse vs. clubs that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 15.51, Missouri State performs above average 17% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 65% of the time.
Missouri State performs better against squads that convert well from the charity stripe. When facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 71.48%, Missouri State is more efficient than normal 63% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 23% of the time.
When playing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Missouri State usually performs worse than average. Missouri State is more efficient than normal 36% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.42%. In all other contests, Missouri State performs better than average 70% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25201st201st328th275thMVC327th69th105th36th190th209th
2023-24147th147th184th136thMVC161st150th115th197th72nd127th
2022-23150th150th166th159thMVC352nd163rd159th89th132nd132nd
2021-2254th54th69th65thMVC135th339th114th98th31st51st
2020-21114th114th45th91stMVC147th84th141st300th80th134th
2019-20128th128th211th168thMVC109th232nd132nd187th199th166th
2018-19192nd191st183rd179thMVC276th244th172nd86th278th213th
2017-18130th130th155th124thMVC274th253rd124th90th116th101st
2016-17141st141st168th172ndMVC238th114th131st153rd203rd119th
2015-16232nd231st242nd202ndMVC110th232nd115th241st149th244th
2014-15251st251st280th260thMVC303rd294th116th232nd276th213th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25260th192nd347th337th174th226th44th138th338th320th100th205th251st174th179th104th291st244th
2023-24195th178th218th132nd191st216th320th156th343rd130th37th295th135th49th232nd160th143rd133rd
2022-23190th273rd361st71st223rd17th247th295th334th189th72nd172nd57th77th28th310th231st323rd
2021-2224th194th5th95th34th121st62nd43rd20th338th7th229th303rd156th143rd43rd345th317th
2020-21121st185th55th257th77th160th123rd167th122nd283rd33rd301st310th250th142nd146th262nd254th
2019-20132nd206th39th100th163rd240th81st2nd55th351st72nd262nd97th52nd262nd2nd352nd308th
2018-19217th82nd306th322nd155th251st117th35th67th342nd90th152nd210th265th201st19th341st279th
2017-18121st281st182nd22nd154th145th135th8th70th342nd44th307th150th132nd189th15th350th304th
2016-17137th175th185th140th158th146th138th6th53rd350th36th262nd80th67th146th5th351st335th
2015-16248th134th222nd211th249th288th276th3rd114th348th78th144th209th149th284th2nd349th270th
2014-15274th251st20th141st273rd283rd341st1st27th351st178th283rd173rd186th285th1st351st298th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25141st268th--47th221st67th128th304th149th53rd343rd138th168th125th110th333rd84th152nd
2023-24114th37th--355th46th291st102nd342nd7th84th205th190th216th65th212th316th32nd62nd
2022-23130th195th--178th125th142nd123rd315th94th74th254th128th224th147th128th319th65th135th
2021-22125th170th--264th64th101st92nd355th27th7th314th30th96th130th80th354th5th70th
2020-21100th182nd--284th74th59th111th353rd28th38th289th161st205th242nd34th354th23rd165th
2019-20118th242nd--61st138th196th164th348th291st1st332nd154th36th130th236th353rd1st6th
2018-19166th213th--32nd255th28th339th353rd330th1st258th262nd218th248th64th353rd1st44th
2017-18162nd108th--335th82nd295th82nd351st226th4th231st207th213th183rd228th344th2nd12th
2016-17215th114th--201st198th202nd207th348th255th3rd339th189th79th189th184th350th3rd23rd
2015-16204th107th--219th199th217th299th348th259th5th316th274th90th132nd188th348th3rd18th
2014-15221st113th--301st153rd246th253rd347th126th5th332nd233rd61st39th203rd343rd2nd27th