TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 UT Arlington  16-15 (0.516)  |  Sun Belt
All-Play Percentage: 0.457 (191st)
Schedule Strength: 0.458 (211th)
Record Quality: -0.058 (203rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 182.87 (181st)
Pace: 70.10 (11th)
Momentum: -3.73 (323rd)
Off. Momentum: -0.36 (243rd)
Def. Momentum: -3.38 (310th)
Consistency: -8.82 (128th)
Res. Consistency: -12.10 (210th)
Away From Home: -0.72 (249th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.51 (150th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.58 30.91 68.99 79.99 43.42 28.41 30.95 20.21 33.60 31.37 61.03 12.22 13.97 5.53 35.51 25.27 39.22 1.96
RANK: 180th 93rd 188th 264th 145th 160th 317th 316th 249th 58th 102nd 118th 236th 283rd 132nd 310th 40th 117th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.24 32.00 -- 80.61 43.26 33.89 33.54 21.16 38.54 25.56 60.07 12.25 14.71 7.30 42.04 26.26 31.71 2.10
RANK: 233rd 268th -- 115th 164th 344th 106th 28th 291st 71st 205th 238th 135th 233rd 347th 29th 79th 14th

ANALYSIS:
UT Arlington has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. Carrying a record of 16-15, they are currently rated #191 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 11 schools in the Sun Belt (average ranking 205.4), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

Defensively, UT Arlington finds itself in the lower half of our ratings. The team is ranked 233rd in defensive efficiency, giving up more than 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UT Arlington hasn't done terribly well defending the mid-range jumper. The squad is ranked 291st nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 38.5% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Thankfully, AO will take nowhere near as many mid-range shots vs. UT Arlington as they typically would, as only 26.3% of their field goal attempts will come from in-between locations.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, UT Arlington still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 100 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #180 in the nation in offensive efficiency. UT Arlington won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 317th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 31.0% of their attempts from long vs. AO.

UT Arlington has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 323rd in the country in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UT Arlington is typically better vs. teams that prefer the outside shot. Against foes that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.94, UT Arlington performs above their norm 70% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 30% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities, UT Arlington often performs worse than normal. UT Arlington is more efficient than usual 33% of the time when facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 12.24. In their other contests, UT Arlington performs better than the norm 67% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25250th249th270th250thWAC188th2nd197th102nd170th208th
2023-24105th105th129th133rdWAC24th177th141st156th60th163rd
2022-23262nd262nd295th257thWAC262nd298th106th55th268th296th
2021-22244th244th265th256thSun Belt247th307th160th257th263rd267th
2020-21243rd243rd179th257thSun Belt122nd69th235th67th116th216th
2019-20129th129th242nd206thSun Belt185th35th103rd132nd12th103rd
2018-19147th147th170th153rdSun Belt267th27th102nd149th111th194th
2017-18129th129th98th116thSun Belt18th237th160th111th201st103rd
2016-1778th78th29th57thSun Belt73rd206th136th28th247th76th
2015-1693rd93rd62nd98thSun Belt37th274th200th319th273rd73rd
2014-15191st191st166th203rdSun Belt11th128th211th150th249th181st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25211th136th360th185th208th79th173rd267th236th208th188th224th194th205th77th274th200th268th
2023-24105th45th87th317th133rd61st87th349th206th143rd161st112th99th104th33rd343rd99th256th
2022-23286th321st339th94th277th203rd233rd141st317th125th238th111th41st151st236th160th162nd131st
2021-22302nd263rd229th85th317th243rd326th22nd256th306th252nd24th134th228th264th26th320th206th
2020-21223rd238th132nd9th338th146th196th21st296th239th343rd24th9th87th234th49th308th226th
2019-20159th289th48th11th253rd89th271st20th29th328th246th168th170th221st151st37th342nd310th
2018-19198th193rd101st124th253rd148th246th91st129th252nd229th204th197th218th164th100th266th239th
2017-18146th163rd281st196th125th144th98th248th114th114th205th74th69th46th136th248th114th166th
2016-1764th191st215th24th111th28th241st292nd81st70th80th91st27th55th63rd308th138th240th
2015-16120th210th133rd8th228th38th290th326th318th18th178th10th9th55th68th336th41st171st
2014-15180th93rd188th264th145th160th317th316th249th58th102nd118th236th283rd132nd310th40th117th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25305th183rd--325th211th236th329th260th190th223rd144th290th360th332nd164th225th156th166th
2023-24118th304th--16th132nd128th229th88th126th104th96th166th79th81st229th149th189th161st
2022-23221st286th--68th226th180th327th128th76th124th228th275th139th272nd234th152nd168th142nd
2021-22136th163rd--128th132nd302nd289th185th131st34th129th161st288th297th315th193rd35th31st
2020-21247th160th--285th169th299th317th209th199th135th101st85th241st260th281st181st96th72nd
2019-2083rd199th--187th81st182nd7th203rd235th173rd101st41st238th211th175th195th164th175th
2018-19101st278th--177th56th203rd12th181st156th160th93rd123rd267th64th192nd173rd155th170th
2017-18112th194th--132nd100th315th111th205th230th33rd117th293rd247th261st320th223rd35th22nd
2016-1789th233rd--75th88th328th105th133rd98th9th241st294th161st167th342nd170th13th7th
2015-1652nd192nd--31st59th330th261st166th25th2nd186th131st71st9th345th229th7th5th
2014-15233rd268th--115th164th344th106th28th291st71st205th238th135th233rd347th29th79th14th