TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 St. Francis (PA)  9-21 (0.300)  |  Northeast
All-Play Percentage: 0.112 (318th)
Schedule Strength: 0.270 (337th)
Record Quality: -0.380 (337th)
Avg. Season Rank: 274.69 (282nd)
Pace: 68.93 (109th)
Momentum: -3.82 (317th)
Off. Momentum: -1.42 (280th)
Def. Momentum: -2.40 (286th)
Consistency: -10.26 (295th)
Res. Consistency: -16.51 (351st)
Away From Home: 0.89 (97th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.67 (312th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 92.22 25.21 64.99 85.35 39.23 28.60 31.01 25.78 32.04 30.97 52.80 9.74 16.83 5.34 33.51 30.20 36.29 1.97
RANK: 319th 159th 346th 123rd 337th 242nd 283rd 138th 347th 89th 329th 237th 30th 126th 255th 148th 105th 88th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.58 22.29 -- 86.99 46.12 30.92 35.99 24.83 38.56 31.25 62.14 11.98 15.81 6.54 35.54 28.54 35.92 2.00
RANK: 273rd 72nd -- 286th 298th 186th 313th 197th 217th 274th 286th 278th 329th 325th 149th 158th 246th 244th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, St. Francis (PA) likely fits the bill. Ranked 318th overall (out of 358) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 9-21. They are also ranked by this site as the #7 team (out of 10) in the NEC (average ranking 281.5). With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.270 (which ranks 337th nationally), St. Francis (PA) has had one of the cushiest slates in all of college basketball.

St. Francis (PA) is not one of the better offensive teams you will find. They are rated #319 in efficiency on that end of the court and only score about 92 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. St. Francis (PA) struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They are worse off shooting inside the three-point stripe, making good on just 32.0% of their mid-range jumpers (347th in the nation), 52.8% of their near-proximity chances (329th), and 39.2% of their total shots from the field (337th) vs. AO. St. Francis (PA) also has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 65.0% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #346 overall in free throw percentage. If St. Francis (PA) does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's knack for obtaining second-chance opportunities off of their frequent misses. The squad has a rating of 16.83 in potential points off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 30th in all of college hoops.

St. Francis (PA) doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 107 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #273 in the nation in defensive efficiency. St. Francis (PA) can be weak on rebounding, giving the opposition too many chances to score off of the offensive glass. The club has a rating of 15.81 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (329th nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 6.5% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 325th) as well. St. Francis (PA) also does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 313th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 36.0% of their attempts from afar.

St. Francis (PA) has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 317th in the country in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
St. Francis (PA) is typically better vs. teams that convert well from outside the arc. Against foes that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 31.42%, St. Francis (PA) performs above their norm 69% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 15% of the time.
When facing teams that favor a faster tempo, St. Francis (PA) often performs better than normal. St. Francis (PA) is more efficient than usual 64% of the time when facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.56. In their other contests, St. Francis (PA) performs better than the norm 27% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25307th307th215th288thNEC190th88th308th193rd91st327th
2023-24354th354th334th355thNEC271st5th347th250th200th355th
2022-23319th319th260th317thNEC169th143rd351st303rd325th329th
2021-22318th318th310th337thNEC109th295th337th312th97th282nd
2020-21305th305th304th332ndNEC137th154th280th185th270th289th
2019-20182nd182nd52nd154thNEC123rd108th332nd65th36th190th
2018-19266th266th141st229thNEC173rd64th326th162nd44th257th
2017-18245th245th130th210thNEC153rd256th329th318th85th231st
2016-17250th249th179th256thNEC71st255th327th318th91st267th
2015-16290th290th229th286thNEC270th186th338th259th132nd287th
2014-15206th206th179th232ndNEC267th109th274th192nd228th178th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25290th363rd224th241st194th113th173rd210th94th275th206th263rd307th299th103rd199th267th279th
2023-24349th229th361st304th319th279th234th267th328th55th347th313th156th219th261st254th36th42nd
2022-23236th147th284th269th225th185th127th95th165th343rd179th358th175th188th151st72nd333rd299th
2021-22319th159th346th123rd337th242nd283rd138th347th89th329th237th30th126th255th148th105th88th
2020-21300th136th140th275th300th275th321st275th267th37th324th94th34th52nd256th269th20th40th
2019-20106th183rd107th71st106th265th168th194th105th14th221st71st59th16th288th216th28th24th
2018-19169th85th181st28th300th155th174th280th337th14th338th68th16th114th205th298th29th58th
2017-18182nd248th32nd258th152nd183rd111th259th162nd97th239th55th314th288th155th257th77th124th
2016-17239th343rd226th152nd178th153rd124th155th167th211th209th38th211th232nd156th157th215th209th
2015-16246th160th156th146th311th113th176th207th242nd166th344th312th98th209th123rd219th189th221st
2014-15259th235th262nd244th250th38th260th266th213th305th145th159th292nd274th32nd263rd300th328th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25301st115th--327th250th337th121st189th321st142nd327th349th205th270th302nd146th90th67th
2023-24353rd338th--216th331st156th340th123rd311th302nd255th294th287th272nd130th111th298th277th
2022-23351st255th--358th309th215th152nd332nd340th206th324th329th336th319th116th306th117th186th
2021-22273rd72nd--286th298th186th313th197th217th274th286th278th329th325th149th158th246th244th
2020-21289th170th--196th311th168th158th113th299th280th309th155th222nd274th150th102nd274th255th
2019-20293rd119th--266th283rd197th264th114th290th305th184th194th252nd302nd151st91st289th254th
2018-19332nd214th--247th343rd170th246th57th312th325th314th78th237th327th142nd49th320th290th
2017-18312th32nd--312th320th177th305th66th132nd342nd294th68th286th347th113th36th326th315th
2016-17268th27th--345th188th311th270th164th101st276th167th157th269th258th238th98th192nd165th
2015-16315th84th--331st307th236th148th200th293rd285th324th180th227th306th165th141st241st223rd
2014-15142nd30th--138th233rd179th116th300th287th36th328th15th73rd251st195th322nd34th73rd