TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 North Texas  27-9 (0.750)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.799 (74th)
Schedule Strength: 0.523 (122nd)
Record Quality: 0.307 (43rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 75.10 (75th)
Pace: 61.06 (362nd)
Momentum: -1.67 (251st)
Off. Momentum: -0.91 (257th)
Def. Momentum: -0.76 (217th)
Consistency: -8.74 (81st)
Res. Consistency: -8.05 (1st)
Away From Home: 0.33 (106th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.08 (184th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 111.11 29.75 77.00 87.25 44.07 31.41 35.96 27.50 39.52 28.34 57.49 11.69 15.27 5.74 36.00 31.51 32.49 2.04
RANK: 111th 85th 41st 179th 163rd 256th 81st 38th 96th 313th 216th 211th 143rd 205th 255th 33rd 308th 210th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.79 26.87 -- 84.70 41.47 32.97 32.12 23.69 33.47 28.03 59.21 11.09 14.96 5.43 38.93 27.97 33.10 2.06
RANK: 60th 164th -- 72nd 72nd 150th 66th 281st 47th 42nd 191st 103rd 209th 109th 198th 307th 57th 91st

ANALYSIS:
While this site doesn't quite consider them to be in the national title hunt, North Texas has the potential to be a formidable opponent for many in Division I. Haslametrics has them ranked 74th overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 27-9. Of the 13 schools in the AAC (average ranking 159.4), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

While favoring an extremely deliberate pace (the third-slowest in D1), the primary strength for North Texas is defense. The team is ranked 60th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 101 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. North Texas has been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 47th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 33.5% of their attempts from that distance. North Texas also owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 66th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 32.1% of their attempts from afar.

North Texas is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 111th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 111 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. North Texas favors the mid-range jumper over any of the others. The club is ranked 33rd in ratio of mid-range attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to take that in-between shot, they can certainly make it, too. Currently rated in the top-100 in mid-range shooting percentage, they make roughly 39.5% of their attempts from that distance vs. AO. North Texas also does a really good job converting from the free throw line. Making 77.0% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 41st nationally in free throw percentage. Moreover, they get ample opportunity to beat you from the line, as the ball-club falls in the top-100 in free throw attempt rate with a rating of 29.75 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
North Texas does better vs. clubs that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 12.06, North Texas performs above average 100% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 26% of the time.
North Texas performs worse against squads that convert well from the charity stripe. When facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.69%, North Texas is more efficient than normal 30% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 91% of the time.
When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, North Texas usually performs worse than average. North Texas is more efficient than normal 18% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 7.04%. In all other contests, North Texas performs better than average 65% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2574th74th29th43rdAAC362nd81st122nd184th106th75th
2023-2476th76th156th107thAAC359th90th88th209th160th76th
2022-2339th39th10th22ndConference USA363rd312th105th92nd266th76th
2021-2278th78th18th43rdConference USA358th103rd134th268th293rd63rd
2020-2189th89th91st71stConference USA355th198th102nd286th222nd90th
2019-2087th87th80th96thConference USA347th325th114th233rd278th78th
2018-19163rd163rd81st136thConference USA303rd280th249th141st200th142nd
2017-18126th126th170th166thConference USA184th182nd150th10th245th197th
2016-17300th300th320th328thConference USA107th164th259th127th188th288th
2015-16276th276th259th279thConference USA101st111th249th202nd263rd288th
2014-15249th249th219th217thConference USA156th316th161st81st214th278th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25111th85th41st179th163rd256th81st38th96th313th216th211th143rd205th255th33rd308th210th
2023-2494th202nd126th44th162nd121st18th123rd314th195th146th159th47th99th152nd146th244th231st
2022-2359th165th47th97th104th92nd69th144th162nd257th79th202nd186th147th112th166th283rd282nd
2021-22109th34th350th150th141st91st111th170th291st275th51st286th140th165th95th180th282nd293rd
2020-21105th266th62nd77th92nd185th146th75th182nd212th29th103rd263rd211th216th95th237th190th
2019-2042nd265th23rd208th14th136th12th180th110th245th15th97th264th181st118th171st247th252nd
2018-19245th300th263rd74th272nd55th306th202nd335th207th94th141st154th308th75th222nd238th275th
2017-18142nd186th344th109th113th165th112th168th313th108th50th250th136th81st173rd186th133rd146th
2016-17303rd214th309th198th273rd271st306th56th340th251st71st268th237th225th272nd48th245th142nd
2015-16233rd41st314th257th222nd308th307th28th299th306th34th215th81st170th297th12th290th136th
2014-15267th117th346th205th220th282nd304th64th143rd251st152nd202nd44th159th274th48th241st132nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2560th164th--72nd72nd150th66th281st47th42nd191st103rd209th109th198th307th57th91st
2023-2488th226th--100th75th152nd211th298th6th46th196th100th323rd218th169th310th57th100th
2022-2321st333rd--53rd15th122nd40th314th6th12th116th34th254th29th175th338th27th77th
2021-2234th256th--36th73rd11th47th352nd72nd9th235th49th91st30th23rd355th18th184th
2020-2177th209th--118th57th141st168th295th58th57th85th148th331st310th156th310th72nd116th
2019-20134th282nd--65th139th89th294th324th160th23rd186th108th270th92nd123rd340th29th100th
2018-1990th285th--64th101st102nd161st326th18th22nd298th165th151st134th158th338th31st77th
2017-18124th275th--83rd134th235th110th301st214th8th280th115th52nd61st272nd323rd9th20th
2016-17290th178th--290th212th301st150th320th239th40th327th301st254th230th265th302nd25th32nd
2015-16293rd302nd--84th309th135th283rd291st159th27th351st318th104th182nd172nd309th38th82nd
2014-15183rd229th--179th169th279th143rd214th134th75th301st240th316th266th279th211th63rd58th