TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Texas A&M  27-13 (0.675)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.896 (38th)
Schedule Strength: 0.642 (63rd)
Record Quality: 0.301 (51st)
Avg. Season Rank: 80.74 (77th)
Pace: 67.38 (206th)
Momentum: 4.95 (12th)
Off. Momentum: 2.83 (41st)
Def. Momentum: 2.11 (42nd)
Consistency: -9.22 (173rd)
Res. Consistency: -9.99 (62nd)
Away From Home: 1.50 (55th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.54 (25th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.47 29.57 70.56 86.93 45.32 27.38 32.20 21.99 35.69 37.56 60.52 17.14 15.36 5.66 31.49 25.30 43.21 1.88
RANK: 56th 15th 218th 58th 78th 280th 228th 267th 274th 1st 130th 2nd 69th 100th 297th 281st 1st 6th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 92.61 24.64 -- 80.93 40.18 30.95 31.55 22.78 31.91 27.20 56.94 10.53 13.03 5.40 38.24 28.15 33.61 2.05
RANK: 35th 184th -- 43rd 46th 188th 88th 113th 10th 102nd 102nd 163rd 166th 238th 244th 145th 139th 111th

ANALYSIS:
Texas A&M is a moderately good team, capable of testing many an opponent that they'll encounter. Haslametrics has them ranked 38th overall (out of 358) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 27-13. Of the 14 schools in the SEC (average ranking 63.8), they're currently ranked as our #6 team in the conference.

Texas A&M will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 35th in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 93 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Texas A&M thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked second in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 17.14. Texas A&M also does a bang-up job preventing the opposition from draining jumpers in between the three-point line and the low post. They're ranked tenth in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 31.9% of their attempts from that distance.

Texas A&M plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 56th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 108 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas A&M will routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is first in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 60.5% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. Texas A&M also does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 29.57 vs. AO, they are ranked 15th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 70.6%.

Texas A&M has been playing some of its most efficient basketball of the season recently and is presently ranked 12th in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Texas A&M does worse vs. clubs that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 9.66, Texas A&M performs above average 17% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 56% of the time.
Texas A&M performs worse against squads that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 12.95, Texas A&M is more efficient than normal 8% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 46% of the time.
When playing teams that tend to get off more shots, Texas A&M usually performs better than average. Texas A&M is more efficient than normal 53% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 85.63. In all other contests, Texas A&M performs better than average 15% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Xavier edges Texas A&M 73-72 for 1st NIT title since 1958
(4/1/2022 9:00:00 AM) If this was the last NIT championship game at Madison Square Garden, it certainly was a thriller.
Xavier edges Texas A&M for 1st NIT title since 1958
(4/1/2022 8:39:06 AM) If this was the last NIT championship game at Madison Square Garden, it certainly was a thriller.
Xavier tops Texas A&M for 1st NIT title since '58
(3/31/2022 10:37:52 PM) Xavier erased a 10-point deficit to rally past Texas A&M 73-72 on Thursday night for the school's first NIT championship since 1958.
Xavier vs. Texas A&M score: Musketeers hit late basket to win NIT championship for interim coach Jonas Hayes
(3/31/2022 10:37:31 PM) Xavier captures first NIT title with late clutch basket to defeat Aggies 73-72
Xavier rallies past Texas A&M for 1st NIT title since 1958
(3/31/2022 10:19:22 PM) NEW YORK (AP) If this was the last NIT championship game at Madison Square Garden, it certainly was a thriller. Jack Nunge made the go-ahead basket with 3.1 seconds left and the Musketeers won their first NIT crown in 64 years Thursday night, rallying for a 7…
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2516th16th58th21stSEC201st33rd9th303rd332nd18th
2023-2428th28th134th54thSEC208th343rd24th185th33rd25th
2022-2337th37th45th25thSEC249th135th61st260th285th48th
2021-2238th38th72nd51stSEC206th173rd63rd25th55th77th
2020-21157th157th215th148thSEC330th202nd91st269th343rd141st
2019-20103rd103rd158th94thSEC339th345th71st8th119th202nd
2018-1999th99th230th127thSEC171st136th47th103rd17th127th
2017-1826th26th92nd29thSEC104th273rd8th155th122nd21st
2016-1762nd62nd166th99thSEC321st341st57th348th227th44th
2015-1620th20th30th11thSEC251st195th28th238th275th19th
2014-1556th56th83rd53rdSEC204th197th76th240th248th47th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2541st2nd274th43rd128th145th168th198th272nd82nd87th40th2nd6th186th219th129th141st
2023-2421st1st258th1st213th89th221st202nd281st9th234th88th1st33rd200th277th55th85th
2022-2353rd1st61st192nd168th256th176th198th284th98th161st103rd4th13th257th190th91st90th
2021-2256th15th218th58th78th280th228th267th274th1st130th2nd69th100th297th281st1st6th
2020-21147th232nd86th28th213th148th296th80th221st157th104th164th14th42nd210th113th214th176th
2019-20160th25th259th248th192nd91st255th265th241st224th91st60th77th67th70th255th202nd266th
2018-19115th99th209th152nd91st250th250th227th99th44th109th75th71st13th249th234th45th56th
2017-1858th105th330th80th26th288th157th235th58th5th62nd148th17th3rd308th253rd11th11th
2016-1786th158th312th74th50th253rd177th188th282nd26th35th73rd32nd7th273rd201st35th31st
2015-1644th70th252nd36th73rd109th185th317th306th6th76th21st18th44th154th328th16th64th
2014-1574th118th277th117th49th290th82nd247th235th5th104th185th88th82nd297th268th6th10th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2514th110th--28th9th307th88th163rd12th11th11th80th9th5th338th210th20th14th
2023-2466th88th--108th56th348th67th72nd210th25th89th2nd3rd12th355th82nd37th8th
2022-2338th106th--108th25th352nd89th120th8th7th134th140th175th184th351st136th13th10th
2021-2235th184th--43rd46th188th88th113th10th102nd102nd163rd166th238th244th145th139th111th
2020-21156th47th--82nd222nd354th220th66th264th6th350th222nd5th159th357th76th7th1st
2019-2091st9th--218th50th353rd209th12th244th16th33rd287th62nd34th353rd7th14th1st
2018-1999th19th--327th55th337th89th154th142nd135th58th252nd335th237th316th105th90th47th
2017-1814th6th--320th13th248th45th311th6th106th40th301st84th6th169th292nd72nd102nd
2016-1750th12th--341st15th329th75th312th27th48th30th205th105th43rd308th272nd19th22nd
2015-166th28th--132nd18th308th50th201st18th24th81st12th116th87th320th213th25th21st
2014-1546th103rd--127th43rd347th45th72nd89th28th110th139th22nd58th348th76th26th4th