Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Texas A&M27-13 (0.675) | SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.896 (38th)
Schedule Strength: 0.642 (63rd)
Record Quality: 0.301 (51st)
Avg. Season Rank: 80.74 (77th)
Pace: 67.38 (206th)
Momentum: 4.95 (12th)
Off. Momentum: 2.83 (41st)
Def. Momentum: 2.11 (42nd)
Consistency: -9.22 (173rd)
Res. Consistency: -9.99 (62nd)
Away From Home: 1.50 (55th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.54 (25th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
108.47
67.46
29.57
70.56
86.93
39.39
45.32
27.38
8.81
32.20
21.99
7.85
35.69
37.56
22.73
60.52
17.14
15.36
5.66
31.49
25.30
43.21
1.88
RANK:
56th
200th
15th
218th
58th
53rd
78th
280th
281st
228th
267th
283rd
274th
1st
4th
130th
2nd
69th
100th
297th
281st
1st
6th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
92.61
67.30
24.64
--
80.93
32.52
40.18
30.95
9.76
31.55
22.78
7.27
31.91
27.20
15.49
56.94
10.53
13.03
5.40
38.24
28.15
33.61
2.05
RANK:
35th
152nd
184th
--
43rd
20th
46th
188th
134th
88th
113th
23rd
10th
102nd
89th
102nd
163rd
166th
238th
244th
145th
139th
111th
ANALYSIS: Texas A&M is a moderately good team, capable of testing many an opponent that they'll encounter. Haslametrics has them ranked 38th overall (out of 358) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 27-13. Of the 14 schools in the SEC (average ranking 63.8), they're currently ranked as our #6 team in the conference.
Texas A&M will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 35th in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 93 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Texas A&M thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked second in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 17.14. Texas A&M also does a bang-up job preventing the opposition from draining jumpers in between the three-point line and the low post. They're ranked tenth in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 31.9% of their attempts from that distance.
Texas A&M plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 56th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 108 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Texas A&M will routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is first in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 60.5% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. Texas A&M also does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 29.57 vs. AO, they are ranked 15th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 70.6%.
Texas A&M has been playing some of its most efficient basketball of the season recently and is presently ranked 12th in positive momentum.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Texas A&M does worse vs. clubs that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 9.66, Texas A&M performs above average 17% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 56% of the time.
Texas A&M performs worse against squads that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 12.95, Texas A&M is more efficient than normal 8% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 46% of the time.
When playing teams that tend to get off more shots, Texas A&M usually performs better than average. Texas A&M is more efficient than normal 53% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 85.63. In all other contests, Texas A&M performs better than average 15% of the time.
Xavier tops Texas A&M for 1st NIT title since '58 (3/31/2022 10:37:52 PM) Xavier erased a 10-point deficit to rally past Texas A&M 73-72 on Thursday night for the school's first NIT championship since 1958.
Xavier rallies past Texas A&M for 1st NIT title since 1958 (3/31/2022 10:19:22 PM) NEW YORK (AP) If this was the last NIT championship game at Madison Square Garden, it certainly was a thriller. Jack Nunge made the go-ahead basket with 3.1 seconds left and the Musketeers won their first NIT crown in 64 years Thursday night, rallying for a 7…
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.