TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Seattle  18-15 (0.545)  |  WAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.472 (187th)
Schedule Strength: 0.410 (269th)
Record Quality: -0.031 (189th)
Avg. Season Rank: 154.36 (151st)
Pace: 67.44 (249th)
Momentum: -2.26 (272nd)
Off. Momentum: 0.26 (186th)
Def. Momentum: -2.53 (292nd)
Consistency: -10.40 (273rd)
Res. Consistency: -16.12 (338th)
Away From Home: -0.19 (194th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.07 (323rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.78 25.42 72.26 86.09 41.41 29.39 34.41 25.11 37.14 31.60 51.32 7.20 11.55 5.04 34.13 29.16 36.70 1.97
RANK: 221st 208th 141st 67th 287th 272nd 175th 52nd 111th 115th 342nd 349th 288th 268th 302nd 63rd 156th 88th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.60 30.41 -- 84.75 42.71 28.34 34.42 24.00 35.71 32.41 55.14 10.13 13.27 5.70 33.44 28.32 38.24 1.95
RANK: 185th 321st -- 227th 103rd 34th 159th 300th 153rd 258th 50th 67th 153rd 132nd 19th 296th 246th 307th

ANALYSIS:
If you see Seattle on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. Their record this season is 18-15, and the club is ranked 187th overall (out of 353) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the nine schools in the WAC (average ranking 182.8), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

Seattle sports an offensive attack that is mediocre at best. Rated at #221 in offensive efficiency, they score about 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Seattle will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked 342nd in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 51.3% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

Seattle doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 105 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #185 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Seattle is extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #349 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.20 vs. AO. Seattle also commits too many fouls, which leads to plentiful free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 30.41 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #321 in the country in that category. If Seattle does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success stopping opponents from converting from locations near the basket. AO will convert just 55.1% of their near-proximity field goal attempts, and the team ranks 50th-best in the country in that category as a result.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Seattle usually performs better than average. Seattle is more efficient than normal 89% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 108.21. In all other contests, Seattle performs better than average 32% of the time.
Seattle is typically better vs. teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter. Against foes that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.02, Seattle performs above their norm 79% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 24% of the time.
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Seattle often performs worse than normal. Seattle is more efficient than usual 30% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 57.06%. In their other contests, Seattle performs better than the norm 82% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
UVU basketball: UVU moves into a tie for second in the WAC with win at Seattle U
(2/27/2019 10:46:00 AM) Jake Toolson dropped 25 points and Richard Harward added a double-double as Utah Valley knocked off Seattle U, 77-68, on Tuesday night at the Redhawk Center. The Wolverines improved to 20-8 on the season and 9-4 in WAC play, bringing them into a tie for ...
Seattle beats Chicago State for 10th straight time, 75-47
(1/25/2019 11:24:00 AM) CHICAGO — Anand Hundal finished with 17 points and eight rebounds and Seattle beat Chicago State for a 10th straight time, 75-47 on Thursday night. Morgan Means had 16 points and five assists, while Myles Carter pitched in with 11 points and 10 rebounds ...
Seattle beats Chicago State for 10th straight time
(1/24/2019 11:00:00 PM) CHICAGO (AP) Anand Hundal finished with 17 points and eight rebounds and Seattle beat Chicago State for a 10th straight ... Conference-leading ninth double-double of the season for the Redhawks (13-8, 1-5). Ian Burke had 12 points and four assists, while ...
Aggies open road swing with 27-point win over Redhawks
(1/18/2019 4:27:00 AM) Aggies open road swing with 27-point win over Redhawks The NM State men’s basketball team cruised past Seattle 87-60, led by three players in double figures. Check out this story on lcsun-news.com: https://www.lcsun-news.com/story/sports/2019/01/18/nmsu ...
Seattle U thrashed by New Mexico State in WAC home opener
(1/18/2019 12:40:00 AM) Seattle University knew its opening stretch of the Western Athletic Conference men’s basketball season would be tough. But not this tough. After three straight road losses to upper-level WAC opponents, the Redhawks’ struggles continued at home Thursday ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25156th156th246th232ndWAC269th225th181st150th321st151st
2023-2495th95th103rd128thWAC249th217th190th80th26th115th
2022-23163rd163rd96th116thWAC107th279th153rd186th323rd149th
2021-22145th145th46th95thWAC29th85th268th314th194th164th
2020-21207th207th168th219thWAC149th64th200th290th277th274th
2019-20208th206th223rd240thWAC73rd290th250th334th301st240th
2018-19187th187th141st189thWAC249th273rd269th323rd194th151st
2017-18190th188th122nd174thWAC212th325th274th187th322nd181st
2016-17263rd263rd245th245thWAC255th346th238th293rd204th276th
2015-16297th297th203rd238thWAC292nd215th296th217th3rd290th
2014-15216th216th161st214thWAC294th349th330th307th351st218th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25250th11th229th181st343rd218th338th249th355th56th329th83rd61st244th214th258th59th81st
2023-24131st187th91st148th172nd119th118th124th226th284th101st217th153rd159th123rd132nd299th286th
2022-23242nd93rd190th80th346th21st323rd260th275th250th325th264th86th317th31st275th281st335th
2021-22227th270th16th49th326th34th218th194th328th274th296th139th283rd294th52nd220th309th322nd
2020-21226th227th79th26th331st26th310th121st269th276th257th212th117th233rd69th170th314th314th
2019-20214th170th37th29th335th106th279th109th319th178th310th277th162nd241st155th146th231st224th
2018-19221st208th141st67th287th272nd175th52nd111th115th342nd349th288th268th302nd63rd156th88th
2017-18212th261st124th158th267th50th127th86th215th347th190th296th111th127th59th82nd347th339th
2016-17315th303rd205th350th244th49th213th288th161st344th143rd234th340th320th15th252nd329th341st
2015-16329th307th270th338th252nd296th107th62nd191st333rd272nd304th239th189th259th32nd311th192nd
2014-15260th266th280th311th162nd213th45th241st232nd218th224th301st229th262nd159th204th155th168th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2586th216th--10th184th181st96th65th248th68th266th27th27th36th283rd117th139th106th
2023-2455th115th--145th90th104th36th288th110th111th170th46th108th67th98th303rd121st187th
2022-2397th112th--206th121st120th56th167th93rd314th138th198th164th225th94th142nd308th295th
2021-2271st324th--30th92nd62nd139th211th25th109th141st139th276th241st116th280th163rd215th
2020-21241st328th--64th201st117th234th268th243rd62nd188th76th190th140th144th304th91st135th
2019-20226th339th--57th196th55th153rd170th247th217th124th13th291st148th73rd201st255th277th
2018-19185th321st--227th103rd34th159th300th153rd258th50th67th153rd132nd19th296th246th307th
2017-18180th338th--157th70th94th219th349th46th9th206th276th199th66th93rd348th7th73rd
2016-17169th159th--294th68th340th38th333rd119th2nd345th285th261st123rd333rd328th2nd3rd
2015-16208th159th--250th133rd348th195th273rd243rd3rd281st349th74th49th346th257th2nd3rd
2014-15176th165th--262nd75th346th139th205th181st27th104th346th141st29th340th173rd16th5th