TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 SE Missouri St.  5-24 (0.172)  |  Ohio Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.051 (333rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.448 (217th)
Record Quality: -0.462 (344th)
Avg. Season Rank: 325.94 (326th)
Pace: 72.65 (42nd)
Momentum: 0.53 (144th)
Off. Momentum: 1.79 (96th)
Def. Momentum: -1.26 (228th)
Consistency: -8.69 (142nd)
Res. Consistency: -10.42 (97th)
Away From Home: 0.37 (130th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.42 (25th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 88.55 26.27 63.33 82.11 39.50 24.25 29.04 33.91 36.66 23.95 54.12 12.89 17.30 6.72 29.53 41.30 29.17 2.00
RANK: 337th 252nd 337th 167th 321st 310th 344th 5th 113th 336th 298th 59th 60th 167th 312th 5th 337th 181st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.58 25.33 -- 82.91 47.39 32.00 36.27 25.95 40.73 24.97 68.54 10.30 15.10 7.66 38.59 31.29 30.12 2.08
RANK: 291st 59th -- 210th 311th 305th 243rd 262nd 329th 36th 348th 122nd 184th 247th 289th 249th 23rd 31st

ANALYSIS:
SE Missouri St. is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. Carrying a record of 5-24, they are currently rated #333 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 12) in the OVC (average ranking 216.0).

SE Missouri St. has one of the most anemic offenses around. They rank 337th in efficiency on that end of the court and score fewer than 89 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. SE Missouri St. is one of the least accurate teams when shooting from long-distance. They are ranked eighth from the bottom in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 29.0% of their attempts from long vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 39.5% of their total attempts vs. AO. SE Missouri St. also has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 63.3% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #337 overall in free throw percentage.

SE Missouri St. doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 109 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #291 in the nation in defensive efficiency. SE Missouri St. allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. They are exceptionally deficient defending inside the three-point line, allowing AO to make good on 40.7% of their mid-range jumpers (329th in the nation), 68.5% of their near-proximity chances (fourth from the bottom), and 47.4% of their total shots from the field (311th).
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
SE Missouri St. is typically better vs. teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter. Against foes that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.02, SE Missouri St. performs above their norm 89% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 44% of the time.
When facing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, SE Missouri St. often performs better than normal. SE Missouri St. is more efficient than usual 89% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.08%. In their other contests, SE Missouri St. performs better than the norm 44% of the time.
SE Missouri St. does worse vs. clubs that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 45.23%, SE Missouri St. performs above average 39% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 79% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25186th185th90th181stOVC101st265th323rd200th253rd236th
2023-24349th349th322nd344thOVC109th268th302nd219th134th350th
2022-23270th270th179th246thOVC12th25th327th73rd58th253rd
2021-22229th227th234th246thOVC16th158th224th109th172nd266th
2020-21280th280th245th270thOVC163rd66th302nd114th74th306th
2019-20333rd333rd335th343rdOVC176th163rd276th99th141st321st
2018-19310th310th303rd312thOVC116th169th246th289th46th288th
2017-18260th260th222nd263rdOVC94th40th290th273rd18th249th
2016-17228th228th223rd249thOVC142nd66th260th155th302nd240th
2015-16333rd333rd345th344thOVC42nd142nd217th25th130th326th
2014-15213th213th227th250thOVC79th90th232nd217th162nd238th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25237th330th191st198th151st280th226th20th41st344th127th116th353rd347th277th16th337th231st
2023-24354th347th283rd155th338th302nd347th27th168th287th346th226th264th293rd303rd27th301st163rd
2022-23256th52nd239th286th281st179th285th113th293rd338th110th64th199th200th138th87th327th297th
2021-22146th37th125th298th193rd82nd118th329th228th176th223rd154th197th249th53rd324th128th257th
2020-21287th89th288th328th297th170th150th287th324th194th321st300th262nd294th115th265th129th199th
2019-20321st155th191st244th333rd253rd312th115th327th207th300th323rd139th126th241st97th177th135th
2018-19311th301st243rd281st277th209th137th151st178th242nd317th197th328th352nd179th132nd224th202nd
2017-18137th126th163rd293rd145th91st36th251st314th281st106th182nd249th268th67th243rd254th288th
2016-17198th273rd69th201st205th134th129th67th108th335th175th57th247th239th127th59th337th312th
2015-16337th252nd337th167th321st310th344th5th113th336th298th59th60th167th312th5th337th181st
2014-15184th208th246th135th175th203rd176th129th241st173rd132nd37th25th28th209th131st193rd155th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25135th352nd--11th199th4th80th183rd107th248th229th42nd153rd251st17th237th330th346th
2023-24318th355th--46th348th15th107th127th342nd317th310th302nd249th313th35th166th341st348th
2022-23269th360th--50th298th67th244th141st125th233rd313th251st285th216th91st174th293rd287th
2021-22308th347th--97th279th156th221st143rd304th170th280th196th255th329th188th169th193rd191st
2020-21240th339th--37th283rd54th296th96th282nd223rd162nd325th179th247th91st148th291st290th
2019-20324th260th--134th339th154th339th69th243rd273rd330th146th251st329th176th74th291st247th
2018-19282nd170th--156th303rd301st138th50th307th157th340th52nd146th263rd311th51st159th102nd
2017-18336th240th--186th327th267th330th81st333rd199th301st132nd100th286th271st77th191st130th
2016-17258th225th--27th324th207th287th196th350th18th331st79th73rd135th280th263rd40th37th
2015-16291st59th--210th311th305th243rd262nd329th36th348th122nd184th247th289th249th23rd31st
2014-15236th314th--64th237th59th343rd187th72nd159th232nd103rd222nd263rd86th233rd213th254th