TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 SE Missouri St.  13-17 (0.433)  |  Ohio Valley
All-Play Percentage: 0.394 (213th)
Schedule Strength: 0.439 (232nd)
Record Quality: -0.144 (250th)
Avg. Season Rank: 237.62 (238th)
Pace: 67.33 (79th)
Momentum: 4.23 (16th)
Off. Momentum: 5.64 (2nd)
Def. Momentum: -1.41 (221st)
Consistency: -8.53 (90th)
Res. Consistency: -11.44 (170th)
Away From Home: 0.03 (162nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.35 (217th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.08 27.78 67.15 82.82 42.87 27.46 34.29 26.99 33.80 28.37 59.81 13.92 18.88 8.49 33.15 32.59 34.26 1.99
RANK: 184th 208th 246th 135th 175th 203rd 176th 129th 241st 173rd 132nd 37th 25th 28th 209th 131st 193rd 155th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.31 33.58 -- 78.95 44.93 25.01 39.12 25.66 33.24 28.27 60.69 10.58 15.80 7.77 31.69 32.50 35.81 1.96
RANK: 236th 314th -- 64th 237th 59th 343rd 187th 72nd 159th 232nd 103rd 222nd 263rd 86th 233rd 213th 254th

ANALYSIS:
SE Missouri St. has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. Carrying a record of 13-17, they are currently rated #213 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #6 team (out of 12) in the OVC (average ranking 207.3).

SE Missouri St. does not have a terribly exceptional defense this year. Rated at #236 in defensive efficiency, they allow around 104 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. SE Missouri St. does an extremely poor job to deny the opposition behind the arc. They rank ninth from the bottom nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 39.1% of their attempts from afar. SE Missouri St. also commits too many fouls, which leads to plentiful free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 33.58 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #314 in the country in that category. If SE Missouri St. does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their willingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of steals. The team has a solid rating of 13.92 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 37th-best in college basketball.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, SE Missouri St. still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #184 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Despite their struggles on offense, SE Missouri St. doesn't really stand out as being terrible in any one particular area on that end of the floor. In fact, they aren't even in the bottom-100 in any of the offensive categories we consider for this analysis. If SE Missouri St. does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's knack for obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 18.88 in potential points off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 25th in all of college hoops.

SE Missouri St. has been playing much better basketball as of late and is presently ranked 16th in positive momentum because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
SE Missouri St. is typically better vs. teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. Against foes that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.54%, SE Missouri St. performs above their norm 67% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team never performs better than the norm.
When facing teams that tend to get off more shots, SE Missouri St. often performs better than normal. SE Missouri St. is more efficient than usual 58% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 80.27. In their other contests, SE Missouri St. performs better than the norm 11% of the time.
SE Missouri St. does better vs. clubs that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.91%, SE Missouri St. performs above average 67% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 32% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25186th185th90th181stOVC101st265th323rd200th253rd236th
2023-24349th349th322nd344thOVC109th268th302nd219th134th350th
2022-23270th270th179th246thOVC12th25th327th73rd58th253rd
2021-22229th227th234th246thOVC16th158th224th109th172nd266th
2020-21280th280th245th270thOVC163rd66th302nd114th74th306th
2019-20333rd333rd335th343rdOVC176th163rd276th99th141st321st
2018-19310th310th303rd312thOVC116th169th246th289th46th288th
2017-18260th260th222nd263rdOVC94th40th290th273rd18th249th
2016-17228th228th223rd249thOVC142nd66th260th155th302nd240th
2015-16333rd333rd345th344thOVC42nd142nd217th25th130th326th
2014-15213th213th227th250thOVC79th90th232nd217th162nd238th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25237th330th191st198th151st280th226th20th41st344th127th116th353rd347th277th16th337th231st
2023-24354th347th283rd155th338th302nd347th27th168th287th346th226th264th293rd303rd27th301st163rd
2022-23256th52nd239th286th281st179th285th113th293rd338th110th64th199th200th138th87th327th297th
2021-22146th37th125th298th193rd82nd118th329th228th176th223rd154th197th249th53rd324th128th257th
2020-21287th89th288th328th297th170th150th287th324th194th321st300th262nd294th115th265th129th199th
2019-20321st155th191st244th333rd253rd312th115th327th207th300th323rd139th126th241st97th177th135th
2018-19311th301st243rd281st277th209th137th151st178th242nd317th197th328th352nd179th132nd224th202nd
2017-18137th126th163rd293rd145th91st36th251st314th281st106th182nd249th268th67th243rd254th288th
2016-17198th273rd69th201st205th134th129th67th108th335th175th57th247th239th127th59th337th312th
2015-16337th252nd337th167th321st310th344th5th113th336th298th59th60th167th312th5th337th181st
2014-15184th208th246th135th175th203rd176th129th241st173rd132nd37th25th28th209th131st193rd155th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25135th352nd--11th199th4th80th183rd107th248th229th42nd153rd251st17th237th330th346th
2023-24318th355th--46th348th15th107th127th342nd317th310th302nd249th313th35th166th341st348th
2022-23269th360th--50th298th67th244th141st125th233rd313th251st285th216th91st174th293rd287th
2021-22308th347th--97th279th156th221st143rd304th170th280th196th255th329th188th169th193rd191st
2020-21240th339th--37th283rd54th296th96th282nd223rd162nd325th179th247th91st148th291st290th
2019-20324th260th--134th339th154th339th69th243rd273rd330th146th251st329th176th74th291st247th
2018-19282nd170th--156th303rd301st138th50th307th157th340th52nd146th263rd311th51st159th102nd
2017-18336th240th--186th327th267th330th81st333rd199th301st132nd100th286th271st77th191st130th
2016-17258th225th--27th324th207th287th196th350th18th331st79th73rd135th280th263rd40th37th
2015-16291st59th--210th311th305th243rd262nd329th36th348th122nd184th247th289th249th23rd31st
2014-15236th314th--64th237th59th343rd187th72nd159th232nd103rd222nd263rd86th233rd213th254th