TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Santa Clara  21-13 (0.618)  |  West Coast
All-Play Percentage: 0.832 (62nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.578 (92nd)
Record Quality: 0.215 (72nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 72.08 (70th)
Pace: 68.04 (87th)
Momentum: 0.57 (156th)
Off. Momentum: 1.04 (133rd)
Def. Momentum: -0.47 (192nd)
Consistency: -10.74 (323rd)
Res. Consistency: -18.23 (360th)
Away From Home: -0.64 (217th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.47 (303rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 117.40 24.91 74.02 88.54 47.06 40.12 38.96 10.24 37.53 38.19 58.13 10.99 16.27 6.67 45.31 11.56 43.13 2.02
RANK: 50th 271st 112th 108th 54th 29th 11th 361st 172nd 10th 194th 245th 101st 106th 36th 362nd 16th 183rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.01 24.40 -- 87.32 42.52 34.78 32.57 21.19 36.02 31.34 57.96 11.37 13.12 5.41 39.84 24.27 35.90 2.04
RANK: 85th 80th -- 194th 102nd 241st 88th 176th 121st 151st 138th 123rd 67th 105th 246th 182nd 148th 130th

ANALYSIS:
Santa Clara has a fairly solid squad that likely falls within the top quartile of all teams in college basketball this year. They are ranked #62 (out of 364) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 21-13. Of the 11 schools in the WCC (average ranking 139.8), they're currently ranked as our #3 team in the conference.

Santa Clara succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 50th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 117 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Santa Clara is one of the most accurate teams when shooting from long-distance. They're ranked 11th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 39.0% of their attempts from there vs. AO. The team will try to shoot a fair amount of threes, too. Roughly 45.3% of their field goal attempts vs. AO are from long, giving the team a top-50 ranking in that category. Santa Clara has also been fairly successful when shooting from the field. The squad is ranked 54th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 47.1% of their attempts vs. AO.

Santa Clara plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 85th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Santa Clara does a fairly satisfactory job to deny opponents chances to score off of the offensive glass. They have a rating of 13.12 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 67th in the country).

Santa Clara has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 323rd in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Santa Clara performs worse against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 59.09%, Santa Clara is more efficient than normal 10% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 67% of the time.
When playing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Santa Clara usually performs worse than average. Santa Clara is more efficient than normal 17% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 113.16. In all other contests, Santa Clara performs better than average 68% of the time.
Santa Clara is typically worse vs. teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint. Against foes that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 59.38%, Santa Clara performs above their norm 32% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 83% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2562nd62nd104th72ndWCC87th323rd92nd303rd217th70th
2023-24113th112th111th110thWCC86th230th123rd146th88th107th
2022-2382nd82nd54th54thWCC44th79th96th84th44th97th
2021-2273rd73rd97th83rdWCC35th93rd108th178th44th82nd
2020-21129th129th112th108thWCC55th314th122nd57th119th157th
2019-20162nd162nd113th136thWCC39th76th188th340th325th125th
2018-19205th205th165th169thWCC221st175th140th285th20th223rd
2017-18267th267th282nd259thWCC332nd244th159th331st2nd273rd
2016-17126th125th168th177thWCC337th181st150th312th200th172nd
2015-16211th211th273rd243rdWCC267th246th122nd123rd13th207th
2014-15183rd182nd224th189thWCC301st97th85th313th71st200th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2550th271st112th108th54th29th11th361st172nd10th194th245th101st106th36th362nd16th183rd
2023-24114th175th197th129th106th146th228th239th72nd92nd115th327th66th36th156th248th109th151st
2022-2378th224th222nd83rd76th197th14th146th221st111th120th164th134th133rd237th171st144th127th
2021-2235th234th52nd170th13th250th12th288th127th12th56th242nd164th97th251st286th6th35th
2020-21175th40th221st270th113th300th333rd231st27th49th191st341st197th193rd279th215th33rd35th
2019-20166th115th69th332nd96th229th109th306th145th77th190th120th250th257th182nd289th43rd86th
2018-19249th236th125th321st188th182nd120th306th204th134th270th263rd217th260th125th290th77th150th
2017-18253rd242nd143rd195th263rd123rd241st288th297th91st282nd292nd276th300th117th289th82nd162nd
2016-17129th346th94th210th108th9th19th301st38th324th201st307th348th349th8th299th320th343rd
2015-16191st253rd68th198th226th77th160th249th202nd227th229th307th315th319th73rd245th222nd271st
2014-15178th322nd37th133rd204th56th137th227th84th224th243rd254th264th299th68th242nd236th273rd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2585th80th--194th102nd241st88th176th121st151st138th123rd67th105th246th182nd148th130th
2023-24113th281st--214th73rd198th31st205th125th188th100th265th231st69th179th197th180th181st
2022-2386th44th--201st94th153rd188th230th165th195th51st100th149th47th139th228th187th212th
2021-22131st33rd--341st91st95th173rd278th15th337th68th40th235th191st43rd211th306th319th
2020-2196th214th--197th53rd171st130th227th122nd170th15th144th165th120th157th212th159th174th
2019-20155th273rd--120th136th66th167th104th18th315th147th210th190th43rd66th107th331st322nd
2018-19158th241st--210th140th157th44th21st315th344th54th195th226th168th144th17th342nd311th
2017-18276th94th--166th331st22nd307th84th266th343rd257th69th55th212th20th81st347th344th
2016-17132nd196th--80th209th50th225th98th204th280th120th11th24th126th74th105th307th310th
2015-16248th211th--238th174th282nd164th89th80th237th228th73rd256th117th264th69th216th137th
2014-15204th278th--100th185th145th259th98th261st210th85th124th140th60th174th111th238th215th