TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 San Francisco  20-13 (0.606)  |  West Coast
All-Play Percentage: 0.631 (129th)
Schedule Strength: 0.476 (191st)
Record Quality: 0.085 (122nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 130.26 (127th)
Pace: 71.18 (119th)
Momentum: -3.20 (297th)
Off. Momentum: -3.43 (330th)
Def. Momentum: 0.23 (115th)
Consistency: -8.58 (131st)
Res. Consistency: -11.87 (215th)
Away From Home: -0.60 (219th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.26 (319th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.98 22.18 63.28 82.64 43.92 36.22 34.10 16.24 34.69 30.19 60.66 11.82 10.90 4.34 43.83 19.65 36.53 2.07
RANK: 207th 329th 338th 123rd 170th 15th 215th 336th 255th 86th 134th 105th 321st 335th 22nd 337th 103rd 275th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.70 28.43 -- 80.90 42.18 26.85 33.24 28.16 36.90 25.89 57.21 10.78 13.38 4.90 33.19 34.81 32.00 2.01
RANK: 69th 200th -- 125th 80th 58th 69th 325th 165th 76th 93rd 175th 95th 27th 60th 335th 81st 188th

ANALYSIS:
Per this website's calculations, San Francisco is somewhere between an average to slightly above-average D1 ball-club. Ranked 129th overall (out of 351) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 20-13. They are also ranked by this site as the #5 team (out of 10) in the WCC (average ranking 166.8).

The primary strength for San Francisco is defense. The team is ranked 69th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. San Francisco is one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 4.9% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 27th in the NCAA). San Francisco also owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 69th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 33.2% of their attempts from afar.

The offense for San Francisco, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 207th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 99 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. San Francisco has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 63.3% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #338 overall in free throw percentage. San Francisco also does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 4.3% of all second-chance opportunities (335th nationally), and with a rating of 10.90, they're 321st in potential points scored off of the offensive boards as well. San Francisco lastly does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 22.18 vs. AO, they are 329th in the overall rankings for that category.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
San Francisco is typically worse vs. teams that shoot the ball well from the field. Against foes that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.81%, San Francisco performs above their norm 8% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 60% of the time.
When facing teams that are typically efficient on offense, San Francisco often performs worse than normal. San Francisco is more efficient than usual 19% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 99.25. In their other contests, San Francisco performs better than the norm 63% of the time.
San Francisco does worse vs. clubs that convert well from the charity stripe. When playing squads that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 68.97%, San Francisco performs above average 22% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 64% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2575th75th43rd54thWCC125th131st99th283rd294th68th
2023-2453rd53rd56th94thWCC197th331st146th314th147th56th
2022-2394th94th125th119thWCC151st161st104th135th150th88th
2021-2225th25th51st49thWCC80th79th80th306th49th38th
2020-21102nd102nd220th154thWCC214th253rd99th298th33rd83rd
2019-2066th66th79th85thWCC173rd154th97th130th15th79th
2018-1972nd72nd58th84thWCC176th230th157th272nd318th38th
2017-18141st141st141st129thWCC223rd69th127th97th138th139th
2016-17129th129th105th122ndWCC119th131st191st319th219th127th
2015-16198th198th186th181stWCC63rd258th181st236th88th214th
2014-15142nd142nd224th188thWCC94th290th106th325th92nd126th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2587th116th207th165th117th73rd162nd241st85th251st68th182nd207th224th71st245th259th298th
2023-2461st351st32nd63rd32nd71st102nd247th78th131st17th70th311th251st91st265th173rd242nd
2022-2369th141st41st214th131st5th46th339th95th306th136th140th202nd213th3rd338th296th358th
2021-2242nd134th270th103rd55th22nd102nd336th95th120th42nd18th39th53rd30th341st138th294th
2020-21115th346th184th27th198th1st240th350th101st199th109th141st309th310th2nd354th259th352nd
2019-2063rd247th179th24th115th25th172nd322nd100th47th139th59th221st310th51st334th92nd231st
2018-1972nd191st324th48th86th100th107th270th320th42nd63rd117th57th99th143rd288th67th126th
2017-18195th251st299th83rd258th23rd180th328th346th101st227th245th273rd319th33rd334th132nd273rd
2016-17207th329th338th123rd170th15th215th336th255th86th134th105th321st335th22nd337th103rd275th
2015-16133rd184th251st107th136th150th124th268th340th39th117th273rd65th81st166th285th43rd101st
2014-15151st104th327th251st89th176th196th308th71st56th146th247th216th76th150th306th43rd108th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2568th300th--87th85th44th5th170th196th273rd96th293rd137th100th67th193rd305th317th
2023-2431st266th--13th65th85th191st220th138th32nd38th16th12th20th180th286th92nd113th
2022-23151st322nd--86th101st85th126th225th151st144th90th129th273rd127th102nd261st182nd231st
2021-2224th275th--49th47th10th1st223rd169th279th34th20th247th41st17th275th324th340th
2020-21101st245th--51st144th6th149th324th114th175th156th185th4th25th10th334th223rd326th
2019-2084th140th--143rd103rd17th240th328th66th181st76th96th105th33rd16th328th187th303rd
2018-19107th116th--153rd157th20th85th341st298th101st149th5th74th121st12th343rd116th253rd
2017-18117th227th--164th105th32nd26th294th206th188th82nd220th50th42nd31st302nd188th283rd
2016-1769th200th--125th80th58th69th325th165th76th93rd175th95th27th60th335th81st188th
2015-16296th194th--261st192nd324th318th163rd86th133rd216th39th156th81st303rd132nd101st51st
2014-15165th197th--141st133rd267th159th264th188th24th229th27th134th27th281st277th21st37th