Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Radford 22-11 (0.667) | Big South

All-Play Percentage: 0.636 (129^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.503 (163^rd)	Record Quality: 0.151 (98^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 114.89 (115^th)
Pace: 65.99 (318^th)	Momentum: -0.69 (211^th)	Off. Momentum: -0.07 (210^th)	Def. Momentum: -0.62 (176^th)
Consistency: -8.78 (80^th)	Res. Consistency: -10.70 (81^st)	Away From Home: 0.97 (63^rd)	Paper Tiger Factor: 1.93 (11^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

107.29

22.12

70.62

88.53

44.79

33.11

37.35

24.21

37.76

31.22

58.13

12.83

13.89

5.50

37.39

27.34

35.26

2.02

RANK:

93^rd

307^th

185^th

17^th

130^th

142^nd

43^rd

76^th

90^th

130^th

218^th

94^th

158^th

229^th

210^th

109^th

202^nd

166^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

103.44

26.31

81.92

44.31

34.30

33.89

17.43

40.38

30.18

58.44

9.18

12.01

6.48

41.88

21.28

36.84

2.05

RANK:

162^nd

192^nd

104^th

168^th

265^th

134^th

37^th

327^th

154^th

119^th

28^th

56^th

226^th

301^st

43^rd

187^th

120^th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Radford should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. They have a record of 22-11 and are ranked 129th overall (out of 353) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the best team (out of 11) in the Big South (average ranking 208.3).

The primary strength for Radford this year is offense. The team is ranked 93rd in efficiency on that end of the floor, and they'll rack up more than 107 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Radford is one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked 17th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 88.53 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 44.8% of them vs. AO. Radford also does a pretty good job of protecting the ball when they have possession and not allowing quick and easy baskets off of their own turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 9.18, which ranks #28 in the country. If Radford does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to get to the free throw line. The squad has a free throw attempt rate of only 22.12 vs. AO, which ranks 47th-worst in the country.

Radford is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 162nd nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Radford does a fairly satisfactory job to deny opponents chances to score off of the offensive glass. They have a rating of 12.01 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 56th in the country). If Radford does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's troubles stopping opponents from converting mid-range jumpers. AO will make good on 40.4% of their mid-range field goal attempts, and the squad ranks 27th-worst in that category because of it.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/6/2018	vs Davis and Elkins	---	W 91-57	1-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 11/9/2018	vs UIC₁₉₄	W 74.23 - 65.82	W 88-78	2-0	107.25	115.69	▲ 8.44	99.20	97.73	▲ 1.47	▲ 9.91
Wed 11/14/2018	@ Notre Dame₈₈	L 64.86 - 70.27	W 63-60	3-0	105.01	111.12	▲ 6.11	107.70	100.51	▲ 7.19	▲ 13.30
Sat 11/17/2018	vs Duquesne₁₇₉ *	W 74.70 - 70.46	L 64-69	3-1	110.01	88.89	▼ 21.12	103.64	97.18	▲ 6.46	▼ 14.66
Tue 11/20/2018	@ William & Mary₂₀₉	W 72.14 - 69.33	W 81-72	4-1	111.93	129.06	▲ 17.13	101.54	110.20	▼ 8.66	▲ 8.47
Mon 11/26/2018	vs Glenville State	---	W 102-69	5-1	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 11/30/2018	@ Texas₂₀	L 58.65 - 72.65	W 62-59	6-1	95.47	91.07	▼ 4.40	111.19	84.27	▲ 26.92	▲ 22.52
Tue 12/4/2018	@ JMU₂₈₄	W 71.51 - 64.72	L 66-73	6-2	113.37	101.00	▼ 12.37	98.15	104.46	▼ 6.31	▼ 18.68
Sat 12/8/2018	@ Ohio₁₈₁	W 69.12 - 68.13	L 69-78	6-3	106.54	100.72	▼ 5.82	99.49	103.99	▼ 4.50	▼ 10.32
Sat 12/15/2018	@ Clemson₃₉	L 59.63 - 70.72	L 66-74	6-4	95.10	105.62	▲ 10.52	105.57	112.68	▼ 7.11	▲ 3.41
Tue 12/18/2018	@ UNCG₁₁₉	L 66.40 - 70.05	L 58-65	6-5	103.74	97.58	▼ 6.16	103.04	100.68	▲ 2.36	▼ 3.80
Fri 12/21/2018	vs GA Southern₉₃	W 74.64 - 73.38	W 80-68	7-5	104.54	116.46	▲ 11.92	107.29	102.50	▲ 4.79	▲ 16.71
Sat 12/29/2018	@ Maryland₁₅	L 60.04 - 75.08	L 64-78	7-6	97.63	107.67	▲ 10.04	114.05	117.66	▼ 3.61	▲ 6.43
Tue 1/1/2019	vs Mars Hill	---	W 80-51	8-6	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 1/5/2019	vs Longwood₂₄₁	W 74.40 - 63.34	W 71-64	9-6	110.61	98.93	▼ 11.68	97.92	92.64	▲ 5.28	▼ 6.40
Thu 1/10/2019	@ USC Upstate₃₃₁	W 75.24 - 62.37	W 79-72	10-6	115.47	116.99	▲ 1.52	91.58	101.85	▼ 10.27	▼ 8.75
Sat 1/12/2019	vs Presbyterian₁₆₉	W 76.05 - 69.08	W 79-77	11-6	112.10	104.26	▼ 7.84	106.24	109.44	▼ 3.20	▼ 11.04
Thu 1/17/2019	vs Gardner-Webb₁₇₁	W 74.66 - 67.54	W 75-58	12-6	110.35	125.57	▲ 15.22	105.10	100.71	▲ 4.39	▲ 19.61
Sat 1/19/2019	@ UNC Asheville₃₄₈	W 72.90 - 57.01	W 71-63	13-6	119.98	117.25	▼ 2.73	89.75	95.84	▼ 6.09	▼ 8.82
Mon 1/21/2019	@ Longwood₂₄₁	W 71.16 - 66.66	W 72-59	14-6	110.61	120.05	▲ 9.44	97.92	87.98	▲ 9.94	▲ 19.38
Thu 1/24/2019	vs Charleston So.₁₆₂	W 71.85 - 65.36	W 86-78	15-6	103.53	138.49	▲ 34.96	99.07	123.46	▼ 24.39	▲ 10.57
Wed 1/30/2019	vs Campbell₁₇₈	W 73.09 - 65.93	L 67-68	15-7	110.97	99.02	▼ 11.95	104.36	102.50	▲ 1.86	▼ 10.09
Sat 2/2/2019	@ Winthrop₁₇₀	W 76.79 - 76.29	W 80-61	16-7	111.74	109.64	▼ 2.10	106.00	80.60	▲ 25.40	▲ 23.30
Thu 2/7/2019	@ Hampton₁₅₇	L 73.97 - 74.84	W 101-98 (OT)	17-7	109.11	128.97	▲ 19.86	105.15	123.51	▼ 18.36	▲ 1.50
Sat 2/9/2019	vs High Point₂₃₅	W 69.68 - 59.54	W 69-66 (OT)	18-7	108.33	97.50	▼ 10.83	96.82	104.22	▼ 7.40	▼ 18.23
Sat 2/16/2019	@ Charleston So.₁₆₂	L 68.52 - 68.61	L 52-53	18-8	103.53	81.28	▼ 22.25	99.07	81.30	▲ 17.77	▼ 4.48
Thu 2/21/2019	vs Winthrop₁₇₀	W 80.25 - 72.79	W 87-81	19-8	111.74	121.79	▲ 10.05	106.00	116.58	▼ 10.58	▼ 0.53
Sat 2/23/2019	vs Hampton₁₅₇	W 77.39 - 71.24	L 71-74	19-9	109.11	100.40	▼ 8.71	105.15	106.72	▼ 1.57	▼ 10.28
Wed 2/27/2019	@ High Point₂₃₅	W 66.57 - 62.61	W 72-54	20-9	108.33	110.97	▲ 2.64	96.82	68.19	▲ 28.63	▲ 31.27
Sat 3/2/2019	@ Campbell₁₇₈	W 69.91 - 69.22	L 62-64	20-10	110.97	107.58	▼ 3.39	104.36	107.85	▼ 3.49	▼ 6.88
Thu 3/7/2019	vs Presbyterian₁₆₉ *	W 74.41 - 70.76	W 84-76	21-10	112.10	127.20	▲ 15.10	106.24	116.67	▼ 10.43	▲ 4.67
Fri 3/8/2019	vs Charleston So.₁₆₂ *	W 70.18 - 66.98	W 63-54	22-10	103.53	103.28	▼ 0.25	99.07	85.71	▲ 13.36	▲ 13.11
Sun 3/10/2019	vs Gardner-Webb₁₇₁	W 74.66 - 67.54	L 65-76	22-11	110.35	107.67	▼ 2.68	105.10	129.16	▼ 24.06	▼ 26.74
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Radford is typically worse vs. teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. Against foes that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.45%, Radford performs above their norm 32% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 82% of the time.
	When facing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, Radford often performs worse than normal. Radford is more efficient than usual 35% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.15%. In their other contests, Radford performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
	Radford does worse vs. clubs that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.64%, Radford performs above average 20% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 65% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Shuler hits key FTs as Charleston Southern upsets Radford (2/16/2019 8:15:00 PM) Still leading 52-51 in the last 1:25, Radford's Ed Polite Jr. missed the front end of a one-and-one. Polite snared the offensive rebound but the Highlanders missed a 3-pointer and, after another Polite rebound, had a drive to the hoop stolen by Shuler.
	Chris Clemons joins college basketball’s 3,000-point club (2/16/2019 6:59:24 PM) The biggest highlight of Clemons’ final collegiate season to date came via deep three-pointer at the buzzer to knock off Big South-leading Radford on the Highlanders’ home ... pic.twitter.com/deRPmCdw0C — Basketball NCAA (@BallNcaa) January 31 ...
	Kalin Fisher brings the 'D' to Hampton (2/8/2019 9:52:00 AM) The practices at Hampton University would be worth the price of admission ... In the first half of Thursday night’s 101-98 loss to Radford, Fisher was scoreless on 0-for-3 shooting. But after halftime, he scored 22 points and was 6-for-8 from the field.
	Radford tops Hampton 101-98 in Big South overtime thriller (2/8/2019 3:17:00 AM) HAMPTON, Va. (AP) — Carlik Jones scored 25 points and his 3-pointer with 0.3 seconds left from the left side of the arc gave Radford a 101-98 win in overtime against Hampton on Thursday night. Radford (17-7, 9-1 Big South Conference) has won 10 of its ...
	Radford stuns Hampton in overtime, 101-98 (2/8/2019 12:17:00 AM) Radford (17-7, 9-1) shot 57 percent, Hampton 49 percent. There were a combined 19 turnovers in 45 minutes of basketball. Fisher’s 3-pointer ... But four minutes later, Fields hit a 3 to put the Highlanders ahead 31-27. Mawdo Sallah’s hook with 29 ...

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR
2024-25	155	0.576	20-13 (0.606)	0.606	0.034	Big South	63.02	-10.41	0.390	-1.71	-0.58	184.13
2023-24	233	0.357	16-17 (0.485)	0.485	-0.094	Big South	64.57	-8.57	0.395	-1.47	0.94	194.22
2022-23	162	0.555	21-15 (0.583)	0.583	0.003	Big South	65.58	-8.35	0.382	0.86	1.16	182.89
2021-22	277	0.227	11-18 (0.379)	0.379	-0.240	Big South	65.16	-9.39	0.371	-0.68	-0.27	270.94
2020-21	222	0.376	15-12 (0.556)	0.556	-0.044	Big South	65.29	-9.72	0.392	-2.34	1.71	224.53
2019-20	220	0.375	21-11 (0.656)	0.656	0.061	Big South	66.73	-7.80	0.358	1.19	1.43	179.79
2018-19	129	0.636	22-11 (0.667)	0.667	0.151	Big South	65.99	-8.78	0.503	1.93	0.97	114.89
2017-18	184	0.477	23-13 (0.639)	0.639	0.046	Big South	65.51	-9.11	0.402	-1.28	0.34	187.82
2016-17	310	0.117	14-18 (0.438)	0.438	-0.157	Big South	67.20	-7.66	0.410	-0.86	0.00	303.31
2015-16	244	0.306	16-15 (0.516)	0.516	-0.054	Big South	68.48	-7.03	0.424	2.23	0.19	214.69
2014-15	190	0.460	22-12 (0.647)	0.647	0.035	Big South	67.19	-8.88	0.398	-0.53	0.90	213.33

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	109.14	31.42	75.91	85.62	43.27	31.66	35.34	22.38	37.05	31.58	55.63	8.68	15.66	6.00	36.97	26.14	36.89	2.00
2023-24	106.59	23.14	74.12	88.99	44.23	30.06	35.67	30.43	41.93	28.50	55.71	10.25	15.04	6.47	33.78	34.20	32.02	2.02
2022-23	102.08	21.54	68.08	88.61	44.06	26.80	34.82	28.34	37.48	33.47	57.03	11.21	16.15	6.45	30.25	31.98	37.77	1.92
2021-22	93.28	22.42	67.10	85.53	40.10	32.34	29.82	23.98	37.40	29.22	53.69	10.98	12.80	4.49	37.81	28.03	34.16	2.04
2020-21	95.87	27.16	69.43	77.44	43.76	27.69	33.38	18.23	35.87	31.52	57.44	9.58	13.08	5.19	35.76	23.54	40.70	1.95
2019-20	99.42	24.00	63.08	84.79	43.30	32.19	33.72	23.22	39.12	29.39	57.09	9.67	14.28	6.20	37.96	27.38	34.66	2.03
2018-19	107.29	22.12	70.62	88.53	44.79	33.11	37.35	24.21	37.76	31.22	58.13	12.83	13.89	5.50	37.39	27.34	35.26	2.02
2017-18	98.91	24.82	72.77	84.35	41.47	31.41	34.65	24.55	32.02	28.39	57.19	11.42	15.60	6.31	37.24	29.11	33.66	2.04
2016-17	90.83	21.43	66.43	83.32	39.54	31.66	33.80	23.39	31.61	28.27	52.54	7.28	14.08	5.88	38.00	28.07	33.93	2.04
2015-16	98.79	23.04	64.59	85.51	43.05	29.43	34.96	26.32	36.95	29.76	56.45	10.23	12.97	5.58	34.42	30.78	34.80	2.00
2014-15	98.21	27.40	66.73	81.74	43.79	26.32	31.64	25.84	38.69	29.58	59.06	12.29	13.70	6.03	32.20	31.62	36.19	1.96

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox
2024-25	110.78	28.19	--	87.89	43.99	34.23	36.08	19.76	36.65	33.91	56.27	11.74	14.50	5.52	38.95	22.48	38.58	2.00
2023-24	112.25	24.57	--	91.09	45.30	36.12	34.03	17.38	40.76	37.59	58.22	10.07	16.88	7.25	39.66	19.08	41.26	1.98
2022-23	101.86	25.20	--	82.73	44.99	30.06	33.70	20.38	37.02	32.28	60.53	10.09	13.21	5.94	36.34	24.64	39.02	1.97
2021-22	102.61	26.87	--	78.46	46.77	28.61	35.14	21.18	41.36	28.66	62.37	8.48	11.24	4.12	36.47	27.00	36.53	2.00
2020-21	102.37	20.78	--	85.23	43.94	33.43	36.56	26.05	37.15	25.74	60.40	12.77	12.02	4.19	39.22	30.57	30.21	2.09
2019-20	103.18	26.87	--	81.90	44.35	36.14	34.61	20.45	40.03	25.31	61.73	9.12	13.54	6.29	44.12	24.97	30.91	2.13
2018-19	103.44	26.31	--	81.92	44.31	34.30	33.89	17.43	40.38	30.18	58.44	9.18	12.01	6.48	41.88	21.28	36.84	2.05
2017-18	102.87	25.68	--	80.86	44.77	30.62	35.71	21.06	36.29	29.17	60.40	9.79	14.38	7.01	37.87	26.05	36.08	2.02
2016-17	105.62	24.52	--	86.71	45.30	28.91	35.48	24.28	39.00	33.52	58.35	12.47	15.59	6.61	33.34	28.00	38.66	1.95
2015-16	107.98	28.07	--	83.94	46.62	25.83	34.96	23.80	40.77	34.31	59.46	12.11	13.91	6.53	30.77	28.35	40.88	1.90
2014-15	102.68	30.13	--	83.82	43.63	24.03	33.28	25.08	37.95	34.71	54.91	12.21	18.40	8.10	28.66	29.92	41.41	1.87

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR
2024-25	155^th	155	154^th	154	113^th	113	159^th	159	Big South	Big South	357^th	357	299^th	299	228^th	228	255^th	255	211^th	211	177^th	177
2023-24	233^rd	233	233^rd	233	208^th	208	231^st	231	Big South	Big South	344^th	344	98^th	98	217^th	217	229^th	229	75^th	75	191^st	191
2022-23	162^nd	162	162^nd	162	126^th	126	170^th	170	Big South	Big South	310^th	310	66^th	66	251^st	251	43^rd	43	28^th	28	178^th	178
2021-22	277^th	277	277^th	277	265^th	265	289^th	289	Big South	Big South	326^th	326	206^th	206	237^th	237	157^th	157	218^th	218	276^th	276
2020-21	222^nd	222	222^nd	222	142^nd	142	199^th	199	Big South	Big South	350^th	350	224^th	224	254^th	254	270^th	270	45^th	45	222^nd	222
2019-20	220^th	220	220^th	220	72^nd	72	148^th	148	Big South	Big South	317^th	317	36^th	36	295^th	295	32^nd	32	37^th	37	181^st	181
2018-19	129^th	129	129^th	129	64^th	64	98^th	98	Big South	Big South	318^th	318	80^th	80	163^rd	163	11^th	11	63^rd	63	115^th	115
2017-18	184^th	184	184^th	184	81^st	81	149^th	149	Big South	Big South	345^th	345	190^th	190	281^st	281	212^th	212	98^th	98	188^th	188
2016-17	310^th	310	309^th	309	239^th	239	253^rd	253	Big South	Big South	313^th	313	39^th	39	263^rd	263	163^rd	163	152^nd	152	308^th	308
2015-16	244^th	244	244^th	244	175^th	175	195^th	195	Big South	Big South	255^th	255	7^th	7	242^nd	242	6^th	6	147^th	147	216^th	216
2014-15	190^th	190	190^th	190	80^th	80	155^th	155	Big South	Big South	85^th	85	133^rd	133	282^nd	282	153^rd	153	69^th	69	212^th	212

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	152^nd	152	48^th	48	62^nd	62	252^nd	252	204^th	204	247^th	247	101^st	101	162^nd	162	191^st	191	192^nd	192	280^th	280	335^th	335	124^th	124	180^th	180	228^th	228	145^th	145	163^rd	163	137^th	137
2023-24	150^th	150	304^th	304	103^rd	103	35^th	35	167^th	167	235^th	235	106^th	106	26^th	26	67^th	67	269^th	269	240^th	240	240^th	240	102^nd	102	89^th	89	277^th	277	38^th	38	306^th	306	199^th	199
2022-23	184^th	184	334^th	334	307^th	307	24^th	24	161^st	161	317^th	317	134^th	134	52^nd	52	197^th	197	46^th	46	234^th	234	151^st	151	65^th	65	68^th	68	334^th	334	82^nd	82	83^rd	83	25^th	25
2021-22	306^th	306	273^rd	273	316^th	316	115^th	115	316^th	316	124^th	124	329^th	329	204^th	204	192^nd	192	171^st	171	315^th	315	162^nd	162	198^th	198	231^st	231	141^st	141	212^th	212	180^th	180	211^th	211
2020-21	239^th	239	85^th	85	235^th	235	341^st	341	165^th	165	278^th	278	210^th	210	311^th	311	254^th	254	46^th	46	222^nd	222	257^th	257	164^th	164	139^th	139	230^th	230	293^rd	293	15^th	15	43^rd	43
2019-20	165^th	165	229^th	229	340^th	340	46^th	46	171^st	171	124^th	124	148^th	148	157^th	157	90^th	90	129^th	129	229^th	229	248^th	248	100^th	100	59^th	59	164^th	164	190^th	190	169^th	169	185^th	185
2018-19	93^rd	93	307^th	307	185^th	185	17^th	17	130^th	130	142^nd	142	43^rd	43	76^th	76	90^th	90	130^th	130	218^th	218	94^th	94	158^th	158	229^th	229	210^th	210	109^th	109	202^nd	202	166^th	166
2017-18	221^st	221	224^th	224	136^th	136	64^th	64	296^th	296	146^th	146	194^th	194	109^th	109	332^nd	332	173^rd	173	251^st	251	138^th	138	125^th	125	198^th	198	170^th	170	121^st	121	213^th	213	189^th	189
2016-17	327^th	327	338^th	338	293^rd	293	82^nd	82	327^th	327	103^rd	103	235^th	235	187^th	187	335^th	335	183^rd	183	325^th	325	341^st	341	204^th	204	249^th	249	126^th	126	199^th	199	206^th	206	224^th	224
2015-16	207^th	207	337^th	337	331^st	331	39^th	39	200^th	200	160^th	160	167^th	167	98^th	98	102^nd	102	126^th	126	245^th	245	210^th	210	267^th	267	282^nd	282	193^rd	193	129^th	129	194^th	194	160^th	160
2014-15	206^th	206	228^th	228	257^th	257	180^th	180	135^th	135	235^th	235	293^rd	293	155^th	155	40^th	40	120^th	120	157^th	157	113^th	113	251^st	251	237^th	237	231^st	231	162^nd	162	114^th	114	110^th	110

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox
2024-25	234^th	234	224^th	224	--	--	221^st	221	167^th	167	214^th	214	295^th	295	108^th	108	138^th	138	266^th	266	87^th	87	146^th	146	175^th	175	116^th	116	199^th	199	95^th	95	259^th	259	216^th	216
2023-24	320^th	320	103^rd	103	--	--	356^th	356	235^th	235	341^st	341	158^th	158	8^th	8	273^rd	273	354^th	354	190^th	190	79^th	79	350^th	350	348^th	348	288^th	288	4^th	4	335^th	335	243^rd	243
2022-23	145^th	145	181^st	181	--	--	97^th	97	233^rd	233	137^th	137	155^th	155	43^rd	43	137^th	137	300^th	300	237^th	237	123^rd	123	121^st	121	263^rd	263	170^th	170	45^th	45	324^th	324	276^th	276
2021-22	208^th	208	261^st	261	--	--	12^th	12	323^rd	323	85^th	85	270^th	270	43^rd	43	313^th	313	165^th	165	291^st	291	26^th	26	53^rd	53	79^th	79	186^th	186	101^st	101	271^st	271	240^th	240
2020-21	217^th	217	39^th	39	--	--	310^th	310	176^th	176	293^rd	293	301^st	301	299^th	299	131^st	131	82^nd	82	234^th	234	288^th	288	127^th	127	87^th	87	256^th	256	267^th	267	41^st	41	53^rd	53
2019-20	259^th	259	243^rd	243	--	--	175^th	175	221^st	221	344^th	344	238^th	238	92^nd	92	287^th	287	53^rd	53	259^th	259	35^th	35	218^th	218	304^th	304	339^th	339	85^th	85	51^st	51	17^th	17
2018-19	162^nd	162	192^nd	192	--	--	104^th	104	168^th	168	265^th	265	134^th	134	37^th	37	327^th	327	154^th	154	119^th	119	28^th	28	56^th	56	226^th	226	301^st	301	43^rd	43	187^th	187	120^th	120
2017-18	172^nd	172	151^st	151	--	--	120^th	120	176^th	176	174^th	174	192^nd	192	114^th	114	135^th	135	195^th	195	176^th	176	78^th	78	153^rd	153	196^th	196	205^th	205	122^nd	122	210^th	210	181^st	181
2016-17	237^th	237	65^th	65	--	--	333^rd	333	213^th	213	150^th	150	180^th	180	197^th	197	281^st	281	334^th	334	127^th	127	298^th	298	248^th	248	155^th	155	64^th	64	145^th	145	293^rd	293	303^rd	303
2015-16	280^th	280	145^th	145	--	--	249^th	249	286^th	286	39^th	39	180^th	180	170^th	170	330^th	330	325^th	325	172^nd	172	275^th	275	101^st	101	149^th	149	30^th	30	146^th	146	320^th	320	329^th	329
2014-15	201^st	201	214^th	214	--	--	252^nd	252	177^th	177	34^th	34	96^th	96	153^rd	153	265^th	265	341^st	341	66^th	66	231^st	231	335^th	335	289^th	289	18^th	18	135^th	135	335^th	335	338^th	338