TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Radford  16-15 (0.516)  |  Big South
All-Play Percentage: 0.306 (244th)
Schedule Strength: 0.424 (242nd)
Record Quality: -0.054 (195th)
Avg. Season Rank: 214.69 (216th)
Pace: 68.48 (255th)
Momentum: -2.77 (295th)
Off. Momentum: -1.32 (274th)
Def. Momentum: -1.45 (237th)
Consistency: -7.03 (7th)
Res. Consistency: -8.84 (19th)
Away From Home: 0.19 (147th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 2.23 (6th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.79 23.04 64.59 85.51 43.05 29.43 34.96 26.32 36.95 29.76 56.45 10.23 12.97 5.58 34.42 30.78 34.80 2.00
RANK: 207th 337th 331st 39th 200th 160th 167th 98th 102nd 126th 245th 210th 267th 282nd 193rd 129th 194th 160th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.98 28.07 -- 83.94 46.62 25.83 34.96 23.80 40.77 34.31 59.46 12.11 13.91 6.53 30.77 28.35 40.88 1.90
RANK: 280th 145th -- 249th 286th 39th 180th 170th 330th 325th 172nd 275th 101st 149th 30th 146th 320th 329th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Radford is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. They are ranked #244 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 16-15. Of the 11 schools in the Big South (average ranking 242.0), they're currently ranked as our #6 team in the conference.

Radford will certainly not be one of the stingier defenses opponents will encounter. Allowing more than 107 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked down at #280 in defensive efficiency. Radford performs really badly when attempting to stop opponents from making mid-range jumpers. The squad is ranked 330th nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 40.8% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, Radford still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #207 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Radford does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 23.04 vs. AO, they are 337th in the overall rankings for that category. Radford also has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 64.6% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #331 overall in free throw percentage. If Radford does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully get off shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of 85.51 vs. AO, which ranks #39 in college basketball.

Radford is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked seventh in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that tend to get off more shots, Radford usually performs better than average. Radford is more efficient than normal 74% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 79.82. In all other contests, Radford performs better than average 20% of the time.
Radford is typically worse vs. teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. Against foes that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.67, Radford performs above their norm 35% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 83% of the time.
When facing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Radford often performs worse than normal. Radford is more efficient than usual 27% of the time when facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 71.43%. In their other contests, Radford performs better than the norm 72% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25155th154th113th159thBig South358th299th228th256th211th177th
2023-24233rd233rd208th231stBig South344th98th217th229th75th191st
2022-23162nd162nd126th170thBig South310th66th251st43rd28th178th
2021-22277th277th265th289thBig South326th206th237th157th218th276th
2020-21222nd222nd142nd199thBig South350th224th254th270th45th222nd
2019-20220th220th72nd148thBig South317th36th295th32nd37th181st
2018-19129th129th64th98thBig South318th80th163rd11th63rd115th
2017-18184th184th81st149thBig South345th190th281st212th98th188th
2016-17310th309th239th253rdBig South313th39th263rd163rd152nd308th
2015-16244th244th175th195thBig South255th7th242nd6th147th216th
2014-15190th190th80th155thBig South85th133rd282nd153rd69th212th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25152nd48th62nd252nd204th247th102nd162nd192nd193rd280th335th124th179th228th145th163rd138th
2023-24150th304th103rd35th167th235th106th26th67th269th240th240th102nd89th277th38th306th199th
2022-23184th334th307th24th161st317th134th52nd197th46th234th151st65th68th334th82nd83rd25th
2021-22306th273rd316th115th316th124th329th204th192nd171st315th162nd198th231st141st212th180th211th
2020-21239th85th235th341st165th278th210th311th254th46th222nd257th164th139th230th293rd15th43rd
2019-20165th229th340th46th171st124th148th157th90th129th229th248th100th59th164th190th169th185th
2018-1993rd307th185th17th130th142nd43rd76th90th130th218th94th158th229th210th109th202nd166th
2017-18221st224th136th64th296th146th194th109th332nd173rd251st138th125th198th170th121st213th189th
2016-17327th338th293rd82nd327th103rd235th187th335th183rd325th341st204th249th126th199th206th224th
2015-16207th337th331st39th200th160th167th98th102nd126th245th210th267th282nd193rd129th194th160th
2014-15206th228th257th180th135th235th293rd155th40th120th157th113th251st237th231st162nd114th110th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25234th225th--220th167th216th295th108th138th266th87th146th175th117th200th95th259th217th
2023-24320th103rd--356th235th341st158th8th273rd354th190th79th350th348th288th4th335th243rd
2022-23145th181st--97th233rd137th155th43rd137th300th237th123rd121st263rd170th45th324th276th
2021-22208th261st--12th323rd85th270th43rd313th165th291st26th53rd79th186th101st271st240th
2020-21217th39th--310th176th293rd301st299th131st82nd234th288th127th87th256th267th41st53rd
2019-20259th243rd--175th221st344th238th92nd287th53rd259th35th218th304th339th85th51st17th
2018-19162nd192nd--104th168th265th134th37th327th154th119th28th56th226th301st43rd187th120th
2017-18172nd151st--120th176th174th192nd114th135th195th176th78th153rd196th205th122nd210th181st
2016-17237th65th--333rd213th150th180th197th281st334th127th298th248th155th64th145th293rd303rd
2015-16280th145th--249th286th39th180th170th330th325th172nd275th101st149th30th146th320th329th
2014-15201st214th--252nd177th34th96th153rd265th341st66th231st335th289th18th135th335th338th