TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Quinnipiac  20-12 (0.625)  |  MAAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.448 (201st)
Schedule Strength: 0.319 (309th)
Record Quality: -0.003 (174th)
Avg. Season Rank: 183.09 (179th)
Pace: 69.44 (82nd)
Momentum: -5.89 (352nd)
Off. Momentum: 0.60 (181st)
Def. Momentum: -6.49 (360th)
Consistency: -11.07 (348th)
Res. Consistency: -12.11 (181st)
Away From Home: 0.45 (62nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 3.54 (1st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.15 25.98 67.41 86.25 42.03 33.78 35.95 21.76 34.83 30.70 53.80 10.10 14.30 5.20 39.17 25.24 35.60 2.04
RANK: 179th 140th 315th 105th 274th 88th 76th 257th 309th 122nd 317th 218th 169th 187th 111th 269th 152nd 219th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.96 24.47 -- 87.29 44.04 30.79 33.36 28.65 39.90 27.85 60.10 10.98 13.57 5.05 35.27 32.82 31.91 2.03
RANK: 198th 148th -- 299th 176th 172nd 135th 337th 267th 111th 217th 202nd 158th 143rd 122nd 326th 62nd 138th

ANALYSIS:
Regardless of what the win percentage says, Quinnipiac isn't a very good team this year. They have a record of 20-12 and are ranked 201st overall (out of 363) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 11 schools in the MAAC (average ranking 236.7), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

If there is a strength for Quinnipiac this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. The team is rated 179th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 102 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Quinnipiac has been generally quite good when shooting the three-pointer. They're ranked 76th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 36.0% of their attempts from there vs. AO. If Quinnipiac does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's troubles converting from the inside. The squad makes just 53.8% of their near-proximity field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 47th-worst in Division I.

Quinnipiac is not quite as good on the defensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 198th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 104 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Quinnipiac will allow opponents more chances to shoot than the norm. The team is ranked 299th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 87.29 vs. AO.

Quinnipiac has been playing some of their worst basketball of the season as of late, and they're presently ranked 352nd in positive momentum because of it. Quinnipiac has also been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 348th overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Quinnipiac often performs worse than normal. Quinnipiac is more efficient than usual 24% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 103.12. In their other contests, Quinnipiac performs better than the norm 90% of the time.
Quinnipiac does worse vs. clubs that do not defend well on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.29%, Quinnipiac performs above average 22% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 77% of the time.
Quinnipiac performs better against squads that are typically efficient on offense. When facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 99.85, Quinnipiac is more efficient than normal 80% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 29% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25218th218th113th210thMAAC20th6th346th79th181st221st
2023-24167th167th38th135thMAAC53rd223rd345th301st150th195th
2022-23201st201st96th174thMAAC82nd348th309th1st62nd179th
2021-22238th238th224th243rdMAAC112th19th234th166th51st261st
2020-21257th257th239th308thMAAC58th247th339th253rd328th267th
2019-20264th264th192nd239thMAAC183rd304th328th273rd231st244th
2018-19255th255th165th243rdMAAC235th331st348th325th75th270th
2017-18261st261st281st273rdMAAC280th66th261st23rd11th276th
2016-17287th286th292nd280thMAAC14th98th232nd97th30th274th
2015-16283rd283rd296th298thMAAC125th85th294th228th259th284th
2014-15153rd152nd179th197thMAAC70th282nd262nd11th335th146th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25229th162nd54th139th286th197th339th124th120th216th263rd91st47th70th207th121st234th187th
2023-24152nd286th22nd31st204th193rd179th91st48th137th312th192nd86th115th245th116th193rd150th
2022-23179th140th315th105th274th88th76th257th309th122nd317th218th169th187th111th269th152nd219th
2021-22191st278th38th126th259th35th161st346th206th62nd312th257th219th277th40th348th70th235th
2020-21307th249th279th239th317th57th247th332nd315th151st329th250th321st314th41st332nd127th263rd
2019-20211th322nd58th149th299th1st108th344th283rd247th302nd346th191st121st1st347th260th345th
2018-19157th187th161st147th295th4th87th348th340th261st308th325th128th200th2nd346th269th348th
2017-18231st150th204th275th278th10th257th308th109th331st230th340th283rd310th5th306th321st349th
2016-17235th228th278th55th286th133rd280th81st226th249th225th140th50th129th164th102nd273rd236th
2015-16332nd324th334th15th350th100th193rd17th298th335th351st241st5th156th161st31st342nd307th
2014-15176th170th3rd5th318th208th318th71st266th39th332nd350th2nd80th264th125th121st91st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25210th131st--201st249th69th329th160th110th327th151st332nd47th127th71st160th328th326th
2023-24192nd185th--222nd179th193rd234th172nd269th246th83rd243rd315th308th174th161st224th217th
2022-23198th148th--299th176th172nd135th337th267th111th217th202nd158th143rd122nd326th62nd138th
2021-22271st81st--288th245th207th341st242nd78th238th248th303rd310th346th173rd190th185th200th
2020-21153rd275th--210th109th136th126th108th61st306th100th334th325th339th109th96th303rd289th
2019-20315th44th--350th259th272nd332nd317th314th207th122nd284th56th93rd159th260th90th139th
2018-19301st77th--349th264th195th279th292nd201st282nd250th211th300th289th99th245th204th234th
2017-18302nd138th--315th258th113th339th281st96th262nd229th256th190th103rd61st252nd219th263rd
2016-17320th271st--245th296th32nd309th153rd85th341st244th319th311th332nd21st133rd336th336th
2015-16159th274th--248th131st25th35th213th181st324th73rd344th264th203rd17th187th316th331st
2014-15134th130th--341st72nd71st155th167th51st350th9th179th231st92nd23rd100th339th341st