TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Quinnipiac  15-15 (0.500)  |  MAAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.253 (264th)
Schedule Strength: 0.323 (328th)
Record Quality: -0.136 (239th)
Avg. Season Rank: 248.65 (244th)
Pace: 69.53 (183rd)
Momentum: 0.77 (138th)
Off. Momentum: -0.30 (236th)
Def. Momentum: 1.07 (75th)
Consistency: -10.24 (304th)
Res. Consistency: -14.62 (320th)
Away From Home: -0.87 (231st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.03 (273rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.97 21.00 74.94 82.36 40.68 41.39 34.37 14.47 34.41 26.50 53.94 7.39 12.51 5.31 50.25 17.57 32.18 2.18
RANK: 211th 322nd 58th 149th 299th 1st 108th 344th 283rd 247th 302nd 346th 191st 121st 1st 347th 260th 345th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.62 21.67 -- 88.73 44.95 32.99 36.91 26.72 41.10 29.02 57.63 12.46 11.15 4.31 37.18 30.11 32.71 2.04
RANK: 315th 44th -- 350th 259th 272nd 332nd 317th 314th 207th 122nd 284th 56th 93rd 159th 260th 90th 139th

ANALYSIS:
Quinnipiac has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. Ranked 264th overall (out of 353) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 15-15. Of the 11 schools in the MAAC (average ranking 246.4), they're currently ranked as our #6 team in the conference.

Quinnipiac will certainly not be one of the stingier defenses opponents will encounter. Allowing more than 106 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked down at #315 in defensive efficiency. Quinnipiac allows the opposition to get off far too many shots from the floor. The team is ranked fourth from the bottom in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 88.73 vs. AO. Quinnipiac is also extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #346 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.39 vs. AO. Quinnipiac lastly does an extremely poor job to deny the opposition behind the arc. They rank 332nd nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 36.9% of their attempts from afar. If Quinnipiac does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success preventing opponents from getting to the free throw line. The team has a defensive free throw attempt rate of 21.67 vs. AO, which ranks 44th-best in the country.

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in offensive efficiency, Quinnipiac isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Scoring roughly 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #211 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Quinnipiac struggles to draw fouls and earn opportunities at the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 21.00 vs. AO, they are 322nd in the overall rankings for that category.

Quinnipiac has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 304th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Quinnipiac performs worse against squads that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 3.98%, Quinnipiac is more efficient than normal 37% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 82% of the time.
When playing teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities, Quinnipiac usually performs worse than average. Quinnipiac is more efficient than normal 22% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 84.20. In all other contests, Quinnipiac performs better than average 67% of the time.
Quinnipiac is typically worse vs. teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. Against foes that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.15%, Quinnipiac performs above their norm 40% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 80% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Williams scores 18 points, Quinnipiac holds off Iona 69-68
(3/4/2020 10:25:00 PM) NEW ROCHELLE, N.Y. (AP) Tyrese Williams scored 18 points, Rich Kelly added 17 and Quinnipiac held off Iona 69-68 on Wednesday night for its third straight win. Kevin Marfo had eight points, five assists, and matched his career high with 18 rebounds to stretch his national-leading total to 400 on the season for Quinnipiac (15-15, 10-10 Metro ...
Kelly scores 16 to lead Quinnipiac over Fairfield 60-58
(2/28/2020 9:55:00 PM) Jacob Rigoni made a 3-pointer as time expired to lift Quinnipiac over Fairfield 60-58 on Friday night. Rich Kelly led the Bobcats with 16 points.
Siena basketball wins 6th in a row
(2/26/2020 11:40:00 PM) The latest win for the Saints came Wednesday against Quinnipiac, as Siena pulled away in the second half to secure a 84-77 victory. The win was Siena’s ninth in its last 10 games, and was its third win in its last four road games after the team started the season 0-9 away from Times Union Center in Albany. Still, Siena head coach Carmen ...
Camper, Carey lead Siena over Quinnipiac 84-77
(2/26/2020 10:20:00 PM) HAMDEN, Conn. — Manny Camper had 19 points and 14 rebounds as Siena topped Quinnipiac 84-77 on Wednesday night. Donald Carey added 18 points for the Saints, while Jalen Pickett chipped in 17. Elijah Burns had 10 points for Siena (16-10,
Siena men's basketball wins sixth straight game
(2/26/2020 9:16:00 PM) Manny Camper had 19 points and 14 rebounds and Don Carey added 18 points as the Siena men's basketball team beat Quinnipiac 84-77 tonight for its sixth consecutive victory. The Saints (16-10 overall,
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25218th218th113th210thMAAC20th6th346th79th182nd221st
2023-24167th167th38th135thMAAC53rd223rd345th301st150th195th
2022-23201st201st96th174thMAAC82nd348th309th1st62nd179th
2021-22238th238th224th243rdMAAC112th19th234th166th51st261st
2020-21257th257th239th308thMAAC58th247th339th253rd328th267th
2019-20264th264th192nd239thMAAC183rd304th328th273rd231st244th
2018-19255th255th165th243rdMAAC235th331st348th325th75th270th
2017-18261st261st281st273rdMAAC280th66th261st23rd11th276th
2016-17287th286th292nd280thMAAC14th98th232nd97th30th274th
2015-16283rd283rd296th298thMAAC125th85th294th228th259th284th
2014-15153rd152nd179th197thMAAC70th282nd262nd11th335th146th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25228th160th54th139th287th198th338th124th120th214th265th91st46th71st208th120th233rd188th
2023-24152nd286th22nd31st204th193rd179th91st48th137th312th192nd86th115th245th116th193rd150th
2022-23179th140th315th105th274th88th76th257th309th122nd317th218th169th187th111th269th152nd219th
2021-22191st278th38th126th259th35th161st346th206th62nd312th257th219th277th40th348th70th235th
2020-21307th249th279th239th317th57th247th332nd315th151st329th250th321st314th41st332nd127th263rd
2019-20211th322nd58th149th299th1st108th344th283rd247th302nd346th191st121st1st347th260th345th
2018-19157th187th161st147th295th4th87th348th340th261st308th325th128th200th2nd346th269th348th
2017-18231st150th204th275th278th10th257th308th109th331st230th340th283rd310th5th306th321st349th
2016-17235th228th278th55th286th133rd280th81st226th249th225th140th50th129th164th102nd273rd236th
2015-16332nd324th334th15th350th100th193rd17th298th335th351st241st5th156th161st31st342nd307th
2014-15176th170th3rd5th318th208th318th71st266th39th332nd350th2nd80th264th125th121st91st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25209th129th--200th248th72nd330th158th111th325th150th332nd46th126th72nd159th326th324th
2023-24192nd185th--222nd179th193rd234th172nd269th246th83rd243rd315th308th174th161st224th217th
2022-23198th148th--299th176th172nd135th337th267th111th217th202nd158th143rd122nd326th62nd138th
2021-22271st81st--288th245th207th341st242nd78th238th248th303rd310th346th173rd190th185th200th
2020-21153rd275th--210th109th136th126th108th61st306th100th334th325th339th109th96th303rd289th
2019-20315th44th--350th259th272nd332nd317th314th207th122nd284th56th93rd159th260th90th139th
2018-19301st77th--349th264th195th279th292nd201st282nd250th211th300th289th99th245th204th234th
2017-18302nd138th--315th258th113th339th281st96th262nd229th256th190th103rd61st252nd219th263rd
2016-17320th271st--245th296th32nd309th153rd85th341st244th319th311th332nd21st133rd336th336th
2015-16159th274th--248th131st25th35th213th181st324th73rd344th264th203rd17th187th316th331st
2014-15134th130th--341st72nd71st155th167th51st350th9th179th231st92nd23rd100th339th341st