Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 PV A&M13-19 (0.406) | SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.191 (294th)
Schedule Strength: 0.297 (323rd)
Record Quality: -0.279 (319th)
Avg. Season Rank: 261.34 (261st)
Pace: 68.28 (159th)
Momentum: -0.15 (185th)
Off. Momentum: 0.58 (183rd)
Def. Momentum: -0.73 (182nd)
Consistency: -8.54 (91st)
Res. Consistency: -8.51 (12th)
Away From Home: -0.73 (196th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.27 (27th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
91.34
68.15
23.46
66.24
86.83
33.81
38.94
26.63
8.18
30.72
29.50
10.72
36.34
30.70
14.91
48.57
10.55
15.31
4.27
30.67
33.97
35.36
1.95
RANK:
349th
167th
265th
333rd
84th
329th
352nd
320th
342nd
337th
39th
66th
260th
123rd
310th
362nd
187th
107th
292nd
328th
41st
166th
63rd
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
101.44
68.41
29.28
--
79.12
35.24
44.54
29.31
10.26
35.02
19.95
8.52
42.71
29.87
16.46
55.12
9.01
13.44
4.82
37.04
25.21
37.75
1.99
RANK:
138th
218th
324th
--
15th
82nd
205th
113th
149th
241st
24th
128th
344th
189th
123rd
58th
49th
147th
111th
199th
57th
292nd
243rd
ANALYSIS: PV A&M presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. Carrying a record of 13-19, they are currently rated #294 overall (out of 363) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 12) in the SWAC (average ranking 307.8).
Based on their performances this year, PV A&M will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 101 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #138 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. PV A&M has extremely pesky defenders that ceaselessly attempt to deny opponents ample opportunity to shoot. The club is ranked 15th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 79.12 vs. AO. PV A&M has also been pretty good preventing teams from hitting shots in the paint. They are ranked 58th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 55.1% of their attempts from close-up. If PV A&M does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's troubles stopping opponents from converting mid-range jumpers. AO will make good on 42.7% of their mid-range field goal attempts, and the squad ranks 20th-worst in that category because of it.
Unfortunately, PV A&M is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 349th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 91 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. PV A&M struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They only convert 30.7% of their three-pointers (337th in the nation), 48.6% of their near-proximity attempts (second from the bottom), and 38.9% of their total shots from the field (352nd) vs. AO. PV A&M is also not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 66.2% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #333 overall in free throw percentage. If PV A&M does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's care for the ball. The squad has a rating of 9.01 in potential points allowed off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 49th in the college game.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
PV A&M performs worse against squads that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.39%, PV A&M is more efficient than normal 23% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 71% of the time.
When playing teams that shoot the ball well from the field, PV A&M usually performs better than average. PV A&M is more efficient than normal 75% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 41.66%. In all other contests, PV A&M performs better than average 33% of the time.
PV A&M is typically better vs. teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint. Against foes that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.17%, PV A&M performs above their norm 67% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 25% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.