TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 PV A&M  19-13 (0.594)  |  SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.293 (249th)
Schedule Strength: 0.335 (316th)
Record Quality: -0.029 (198th)
Avg. Season Rank: 220.53 (218th)
Pace: 71.98 (50th)
Momentum: -2.48 (293rd)
Off. Momentum: 0.59 (188th)
Def. Momentum: -3.07 (310th)
Consistency: -6.99 (8th)
Res. Consistency: -6.97 (2nd)
Away From Home: 0.29 (132nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.59 (14th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 91.30 26.38 71.18 79.50 41.46 22.88 28.83 28.11 39.84 28.51 53.20 11.37 12.34 4.68 28.79 35.35 35.86 1.93
RANK: 305th 131st 178th 270th 265th 343rd 339th 43rd 59th 171st 318th 143rd 201st 198th 340th 28th 129th 29th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.96 34.18 -- 72.84 45.25 29.96 32.30 16.31 37.74 26.56 64.48 10.20 11.71 3.77 41.13 22.39 36.47 2.05
RANK: 159th 350th -- 3rd 271st 140th 112th 4th 201st 92nd 317th 100th 86th 36th 306th 16th 234th 131st

ANALYSIS:
PV A&M has a squad that most likely falls somewhere in the bottom half of NCAA Division I teams this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 249th overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 19-13. They are also ranked by this site as the best team (out of 10) in the SWAC (average ranking 313.5).

PV A&M will likely call on their defense to win a majority of their games. The team is ranked 159th in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. PV A&M has extremely pesky defenders that ceaselessly attempt to deny opponents ample opportunity to shoot. The club is ranked third in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 72.84 vs. AO. PV A&M is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 3.8% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 36th in the NCAA). If PV A&M does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's tendency to send opponents to the line too much by fouling. The squad has a rating of 34.18 in defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks fourth-worst in the country.

The offense for PV A&M, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 305th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 91 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. PV A&M is one of the least accurate teams when shooting from long-distance. They are ranked 339th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 28.8% of their attempts from long vs. AO. PV A&M also won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 318th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 53.2% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

PV A&M is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked eighth in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
PV A&M is typically worse vs. teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. Against foes that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.83, PV A&M performs above their norm 27% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 74% of the time.
When facing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, PV A&M often performs worse than normal. PV A&M is more efficient than usual 38% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.59%. In their other contests, PV A&M performs better than the norm 79% of the time.
PV A&M does better vs. clubs that tend to get off more shots. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 81.00, PV A&M performs above average 70% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 30% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Sports Minute: Priarie View A&M cruises to SWAC semis thumping Alabama A&M
(3/10/2020 10:56:00 PM) PRAIRIE VIEW, Texas (AP) - Gerard Andrus scored a career-high 32 points and Prairie View easily defeated Alabama A&M 82-60 in the Southwestern Athletic Conference Tournament quarterfinals. Devonte Patterson's 3-pointer broke a tie at nine, the basket started an 8-0 run and the top-seed Panthers led the rest of the way. Prairie View led 37-27 at ...
Priarie View A&M cruises to SWAC semis thumping Alabama A&M
(3/10/2020 9:54:00 PM) Gerard Andrus scored a career-high 32 points and Prairie View easily defeated Alabama A&M 82-60 in the Southwestern Athletic Conference Tournament quarterfinals on Tuesday.
In possible SWAC championship preview, Southern men beat Prairie View in overtime
(3/7/2020 10:05:00 PM) By the time Southern and Prairie View finished playing Saturday night at the F.G. Clark Activity Center, the teams were already guaranteed to be the top two seeds in the
Andrus leads Prairie View past Alabama A&M 73-62
(3/3/2020 12:15:00 AM) Gerard Andrus scored 21 points with seven rebounds and five assists and Prairie View A&M won its eighth straight, beating Alabama A&M 73-62 on Monday night.
Prairie View beats Mississippi Valley St. 88-69
(2/25/2020 3:18:00 AM) ITTA BENA, Miss. (AP) — Gerard Andrus scored 24 points with 15 rebounds and Prairie View A&M beat Mississippi Valley State 88-69 on Monday night to remain atop Southwestern Athletic Conference standings. Devonte Patters scored 17 points with seven assists for the Panthers (16-11, 12-2), who have won six straight. Chancellor Ellis scored 14 ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25355th355th358th358thSWAC69th219th297th1st67th338th
2023-24334th334th312th333rdSWAC23rd174th316th18th74th304th
2022-23294th293rd264th319thSWAC159th91st323rd27th196th261st
2021-22287th287th315th304thSWAC28th113th196th263rd240th295th
2020-21290th290th19th115thSWAC81st140th345th293rd185th292nd
2019-20249th249th122nd198thSWAC50th8th316th14th132nd218th
2018-19234th234th88th166thSWAC18th222nd324th182nd145th256th
2017-18296th296th203rd242ndSWAC30th62nd315th30th140th262nd
2016-17316th315th261st303rdSWAC149th167th325th148th210th316th
2015-16328th326th333rd336thSWAC155th248th277th92nd209th328th
2014-15310th310th216th268thSWAC22nd232nd331st29th171st313th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25330th263rd295th230th268th341st339th127th239th72nd290th192nd329th275th338th111th61st25th
2023-24332nd162nd157th320th284th362nd336th23rd326th173rd224th22nd246th181st362nd13th122nd9th
2022-23349th265th333rd84th352nd320th337th39th260th123rd362nd187th107th292nd328th41st166th63rd
2021-22293rd111th190th346th235th322nd106th164th316th166th290th90th94th96th289th118th91st58th
2020-21305th353rd336th106th224th223rd345th242nd289th25th139th55th115th184th247th256th32nd51st
2019-20305th131st178th270th265th343rd339th43rd59th171st318th143rd201st198th340th28th129th29th
2018-19268th34th273rd299th262nd298th256th84th137th234th278th27th178th125th269th58th205th129th
2017-18296th121st311th257th266th243rd332nd205th305th104th197th52nd234th277th225th188th88th97th
2016-17320th299th203rd213th316th142nd221st168th313th256th316th61st307th344th128th160th246th239th
2015-16345th259th241st165th345th336th340th55th322nd73rd347th145th161st212th336th55th81st25th
2014-15301st336th291st62nd253rd309th284th46th139th78th302nd40th267th279th321st54th111th48th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25358th331st--185th362nd122nd322nd31st342nd344th345th112th363rd364th117th31st347th325th
2023-24309th350th--7th360th76th320th18th277th183rd362nd157th330th338th189th53rd300th253rd
2022-23138th324th--15th205th113th241st24th344th189th58th49th147th111th199th57th292nd243rd
2021-22251st352nd--60th217th221st226th5th50th280th236th334th355th338th262nd6th320th224th
2020-21160th352nd--15th270th109th186th3rd216th302nd219th216th321st134th195th6th345th311th
2019-20159th350th--3rd271st140th112th4th201st92nd317th100th86th36th306th16th234th131st
2018-19181st341st--3rd314th106th75th12th319th121st339th36th196th332nd242nd41st260th191st
2017-18259th336th--4th333rd129th201st4th335th210th334th128th33rd218th270th6th302nd216th
2016-17295th340th--4th344th90th338th6th347th202nd278th97th55th273rd231st16th309th241st
2015-16229th346th--6th306th100th62nd9th346th196th273rd232nd318th333rd230th27th286th239th
2014-15267th342nd--45th305th92nd177th80th209th207th325th80th343rd343rd138th117th265th250th