TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Vanderbilt  22-15 (0.595)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.793 (76th)
Schedule Strength: 0.694 (29th)
Record Quality: 0.253 (59th)
Avg. Season Rank: 87.26 (84th)
Pace: 67.09 (221st)
Momentum: 0.87 (130th)
Off. Momentum: -0.50 (245th)
Def. Momentum: 1.38 (63rd)
Consistency: -9.72 (245th)
Res. Consistency: -12.23 (192nd)
Away From Home: -0.50 (165th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.68 (164th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 111.92 27.95 70.87 89.35 44.38 36.22 35.35 22.43 36.52 30.70 60.77 9.90 17.55 5.45 40.54 25.10 34.36 2.06
RANK: 39th 70th 216th 13th 148th 34th 101st 236th 252nd 124th 116th 228th 30th 156th 69th 273rd 205th 267th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.00 24.41 -- 88.07 42.06 31.61 31.22 27.58 40.51 28.87 55.40 8.64 14.74 4.97 35.90 31.32 32.79 2.03
RANK: 126th 146th -- 321st 83rd 212th 49th 319th 292nd 151st 62nd 32nd 252nd 131st 153rd 299th 88th 144th

ANALYSIS:
While this site doesn't quite consider them to be in the national title hunt, Vanderbilt has the potential to be a formidable opponent for many in Division I. They are ranked #76 (out of 363) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 22-15. Of the 14 schools in the SEC (average ranking 78.8), they're currently ranked as our #9 team in the conference.

The primary strength for Vanderbilt this year is offense. The team is ranked 39th in efficiency on that end of the floor, and they'll rack up more than 111 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Vanderbilt is one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked 13th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 89.35 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 44.4% of them vs. AO. Vanderbilt has also established itself as a team that cleans the offensive glass quite well. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 17.55 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 30th in the NCAA).

Vanderbilt is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 126th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 101 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Vanderbilt has done a very good job to prevent opponents from draining threes this year. They rank 49th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.2% of their attempts from afar. Vanderbilt has also been pretty good preventing teams from hitting shots in the paint. They are ranked 62nd in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 55.4% of their attempts from close-up. If Vanderbilt does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's propensity to allow too many shot attempts per trip. The squad has a rating of 88.07 in defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO, which ranks 43rd-worst in college basketball.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Vanderbilt is typically worse vs. teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.29, Vanderbilt performs above their norm 27% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 68% of the time.
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Vanderbilt often performs better than normal. Vanderbilt is more efficient than usual 77% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 62.04%. In their other contests, Vanderbilt performs better than the norm 38% of the time.
Vanderbilt does better vs. clubs that prefer the outside shot. When playing squads that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.97, Vanderbilt performs above average 64% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 25% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2545th45th113th59thSEC72nd46th56th354th266th48th
2023-24161st159th326th227thSEC295th43rd39th127th183rd174th
2022-2376th76th121st59thSEC221st245th29th164th165th84th
2021-2265th64th180th89thSEC141st43rd41st341st60th72nd
2020-2179th79th269th180thSEC140th127th61st310th58th96th
2019-20169th168th292nd194thSEC133rd174th73rd188th180th153rd
2018-19156th155th324th219thSEC197th124th49th307th176th110th
2017-1883rd83rd274th152ndSEC310th349th7th350th349th84th
2016-1731st31st157th50thSEC289th319th5th102nd276th57th
2015-1623rd23rd131st78thSEC233rd256th41st344th295th15th
2014-1531st31st113th65thSEC231st52nd65th159th210th49th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2535th86th122nd33rd70th100th115th276th89th37th88th7th11th2nd140th293rd77th140th
2023-24165th124th215th51st249th131st308th84th280th252nd85th138th109th232nd168th104th291st255th
2022-2339th70th216th13th148th34th101st236th252nd124th116th228th30th156th69th273rd205th267th
2021-2285th6th240th284th121st67th98th316th159th219th131st124th211th260th48th314th177th290th
2020-2167th77th85th238th88th42nd46th326th226th185th101st106th114th126th34th325th163rd285th
2019-20154th31st252nd286th177th77th182nd343rd211th80th215th73rd286th322nd56th342nd63rd197th
2018-19247th35th286th326th204th189th323rd320th241st108th177th306th263rd178th126th310th56th136th
2017-1824th56th52nd171st57th38th45th333rd38th112th110th137th255th283rd40th332nd119th259th
2016-1743rd157th5th232nd89th6th39th322nd59th323rd76th230th322nd285th6th316th317th347th
2015-1626th91st198th138th22nd93rd32nd237th71st154th22nd223rd244th245th107th239th171st226th
2014-1520th67th85th246th11th172nd2nd208th69th207th23rd274th234th123rd145th198th183rd199th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2558th198th--9th110th79th230th171st95th64th93rd3rd92nd112th172nd233rd137th154th
2023-24214th43rd--268th170th325th261st126th242nd153rd129th10th205th299th317th106th124th71st
2022-23126th146th--321st83rd212th49th319th292nd151st62nd32nd252nd131st153rd299th88th144th
2021-2241st224th--29th68th176th48th202nd82nd26th183rd129th32nd37th238th276th54th63rd
2020-2195th184th--40th165th198th108th65th145th108th260th214th85th56th280th99th171st114th
2019-20202nd171st--111th249th107th242nd136th170th246th212th92nd125th250th121st157th257th253rd
2018-19103rd186th--216th63rd145th151st331st172nd70th47th218th286th143rd119th330th49th127th
2017-18199th191st--213th201st44th280th316th204th156th159th17th41st31st39th320th137th244th
2016-1729th39th--241st37th109th35th308th197th148th17th33rd103rd28th82nd301st121st206th
2015-1625th94th--333rd6th74th12th335th3rd210th40th114th87th18th31st318th142nd248th
2014-1591st120th--270th52nd196th187th317th26th110th71st204th76th119th156th295th81st125th