Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Chattanooga21-12 (0.636) | Southern
All-Play Percentage: 0.607 (142nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.382 (229th)
Record Quality: 0.095 (129th)
Avg. Season Rank: 174.43 (171st)
Pace: 67.51 (200th)
Momentum: -2.63 (282nd)
Off. Momentum: -0.53 (226th)
Def. Momentum: -2.10 (279th)
Consistency: -10.59 (321st)
Res. Consistency: -17.37 (356th)
Away From Home: 0.86 (81st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.81 (264th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
109.75
67.43
23.63
76.39
85.19
38.45
45.14
41.15
14.80
35.96
19.47
8.75
44.93
24.57
14.91
60.69
11.68
11.26
3.94
48.30
22.85
28.84
2.19
RANK:
97th
205th
289th
34th
200th
134th
123rd
5th
6th
86th
279th
186th
15th
349th
312th
88th
162nd
279th
324th
2nd
281st
347th
360th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
106.27
67.60
24.64
--
90.11
38.47
42.69
35.89
12.62
35.17
25.55
9.36
36.62
28.68
16.50
57.52
13.97
15.09
5.54
39.82
28.36
31.82
2.08
RANK:
193rd
170th
107th
--
343rd
222nd
100th
333rd
334th
222nd
285th
239th
79th
90th
97th
164th
334th
298th
185th
299th
240th
46th
43rd
ANALYSIS: They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Chattanooga, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Ranked 142nd overall (out of 362) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 21-12. Of the 10 schools in the Southern (average ranking 187.8), they're currently ranked as our #3 team in the conference.
Chattanooga succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 97th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 109 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Chattanooga lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks second in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to shoot from long, they have the ability to punish you for it, too. Ranked in the top-100 in three-point shooting percentage, they make approximately 36.0% of their three-point attempts vs. AO. Chattanooga is also superb at converting jumpers in between the three-point stripe and the low post. The squad is ranked 15th nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 44.9% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. If Chattanooga does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's penchant for allowing too many easy buckets off of giveaways. The squad has a rating of 13.97 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of steals, which ranks 29th-worst in the college game.
Chattanooga doesn't perform as well defensively as they do offensively. The team is ranked 193rd in defensive efficiency, allowing about 106 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Chattanooga allows the opposition to get off far too many shots from the floor. The team is ranked 343rd in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 90.11 vs. AO.
Chattanooga has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 321st in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Chattanooga performs better against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 12.27, Chattanooga is more efficient than normal 69% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 27% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from outside the arc, Chattanooga usually performs worse than average. Chattanooga is more efficient than normal 20% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.61%. In all other contests, Chattanooga performs better than average 62% of the time.
Chattanooga is typically better vs. teams that effectively clean the offensive glass. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 11.33, Chattanooga performs above their norm 62% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 20% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.