TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 N. Colorado  14-15 (0.483)  |  Big Sky
All-Play Percentage: 0.234 (269th)
Schedule Strength: 0.387 (298th)
Record Quality: -0.107 (227th)
Avg. Season Rank: 238.02 (239th)
Pace: 64.17 (262nd)
Momentum: -1.75 (265th)
Off. Momentum: -1.36 (295th)
Def. Momentum: -0.39 (148th)
Consistency: -9.91 (260th)
Res. Consistency: -8.21 (8th)
Away From Home: -1.24 (293rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.52 (230th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.65 28.08 65.06 86.09 43.81 27.89 35.66 27.72 36.56 30.48 57.86 11.40 17.43 7.05 32.40 32.19 35.41 1.97
RANK: 97th 198th 302nd 25th 134th 184th 114th 108th 118th 86th 190th 164th 58th 122nd 228th 142nd 141st 126th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 115.28 32.37 -- 82.10 48.11 31.27 38.01 22.07 36.75 28.76 67.81 11.22 16.83 8.29 38.08 26.88 35.03 2.03
RANK: 348th 281st -- 173rd 331st 299th 329th 45th 225th 186th 346th 149th 286th 300th 304th 38th 187th 98th

ANALYSIS:
N. Colorado is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. They are ranked #269 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 14-15. Of the 12 schools in the Big Sky (average ranking 242.4), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

N. Colorado has a reasonably potent offensive attack. Occupying the #97 slot in our offensive efficiency rankings, they will score about 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. N. Colorado is one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked 25th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 86.09 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 43.8% of them vs. AO. N. Colorado also does an adequate job of creating chances for themselves off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 17.43 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 58th in the NCAA). If N. Colorado does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's poor shooting at the line. The squad makes just 65.1% of their free throw attempts, which ranks 50th-worst in Division I.

Sadly for N. Colorado, the drop-off from offensive efficiency to defensive efficiency is massive. The team is ranked fourth from the bottom in defensive efficiency, allowing about 115 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. N. Colorado allows the opposition far too many easy shots from the floor and ranks in the bottom-25 in three of our four major defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 38.0% of their three-pointers (329th in the nation), 67.8% of their near-proximity attempts (sixth from the bottom), and 48.1% of their total shots from the field (331st).
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
N. Colorado performs worse against squads that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 10.70, N. Colorado is more efficient than normal 30% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 72% of the time.
When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, N. Colorado usually performs worse than average. N. Colorado is more efficient than normal 40% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.68%. In all other contests, N. Colorado performs better than average 77% of the time.
N. Colorado is typically worse vs. teams that shoot the ball well from the field. Against foes that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.14%, N. Colorado performs above their norm 33% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 68% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25111th110th43rd99thBig Sky103rd266th250th209th75th131st
2023-24202nd202nd140th208thBig Sky75th250th298th287th161st215th
2022-23228th228th280th234thBig Sky70th28th162nd311th210th228th
2021-22225th225th141st179thBig Sky57th171st239th68th37th208th
2020-21220th220th179th244thBig Sky153rd34th236th120th22nd206th
2019-2071st71st43rd93rdBig Sky314th99th195th254th62nd97th
2018-19186th185th73rd175thBig Sky191st135th328th192nd47th174th
2017-18108th108th61st96thBig Sky19th148th188th91st70th136th
2016-17286th286th268th288thBig Sky126th263rd247th236th16th259th
2015-16303rd303rd289th311thBig Sky115th188th285th181st67th321st
2014-15269th269th201st227thBig Sky262nd260th298th230th293rd239th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2581st212th159th243rd35th214th48th273rd64th73rd86th245th315th229th200th271st57th89th
2023-24177th352nd162nd197th58th190th174th119th76th254th20th242nd318th272nd189th114th250th214th
2022-23148th264th60th182nd154th99th149th281st156th132nd166th332nd254th279th103rd284th137th222nd
2021-22103rd236th224th288th75th13th30th333rd171st299th54th335th343rd342nd7th328th280th342nd
2020-21244th251st275th296th219th43rd77th319th140th272nd289th347th259th322nd18th309th227th315th
2019-2046th314th247th37th58th9th22nd347th294th60th99th286th268th308th15th349th105th281st
2018-19202nd160th193rd282nd213th45th194th338th282nd163rd206th258th261st333rd20th335th132nd273rd
2017-18110th180th252nd186th83rd100th130th310th72nd72nd137th246th326th307th99th311th63rd164th
2016-17318th304th351st287th247th31st243rd349th301st84th258th263rd288th336th18th348th61st254th
2015-16267th141st120th337th227th278th113th209th283rd175th265th186th228th286th239th159th109th99th
2014-1597th198th302nd25th134th184th114th108th118th86th190th164th58th122nd228th142nd141st126th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25184th270th--59th239th17th313th252nd160th212th166th111th6th27th27th284th264th319th
2023-24243rd34th--296th239th236th307th290th284th123rd223rd235th113th119th185th277th98th118th
2022-23312th201st--317th307th69th200th344th327th226th274th187th253rd215th37th332nd171st280th
2021-22333rd162nd--338th315th27th346th310th256th347th179th273rd98th186th11th284th332nd349th
2020-21220th217th--261st258th1st83rd346th290th340th98th264th99th54th1st346th335th357th
2019-20124th25th--301st246th1st12th340th297th334th161st27th116th123rd2nd339th325th352nd
2018-19175th46th--171st277th5th318th257th220th326th144th265th115th257th6th256th337th347th
2017-1897th247th--119th174th1st33rd335th163rd255th183rd123rd149th173rd1st340th266th347th
2016-17213th106th--143rd272nd178th178th258th332nd89th294th163rd148th209th176th271st95th125th
2015-16338th336th--77th304th260th308th58th250th150th300th201st211th248th288th71st175th108th
2014-15348th281st--173rd331st299th329th45th225th186th346th149th286th300th304th38th187th98th