TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Memphis  18-14 (0.563)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.720 (99th)
Schedule Strength: 0.527 (142nd)
Record Quality: 0.085 (126th)
Avg. Season Rank: 83.42 (80th)
Pace: 66.53 (122nd)
Momentum: -2.72 (292nd)
Off. Momentum: 1.54 (117th)
Def. Momentum: -4.26 (336th)
Consistency: -9.55 (216th)
Res. Consistency: -14.73 (326th)
Away From Home: -2.46 (339th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.87 (339th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.30 26.55 65.13 85.75 44.87 24.27 33.18 27.62 35.63 33.85 60.79 12.92 20.66 8.48 28.31 32.21 39.48 1.89
RANK: 127th 259th 300th 30th 88th 293rd 234th 111th 160th 12th 106th 77th 11th 30th 316th 141st 36th 19th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.24 30.76 -- 82.17 40.55 26.12 32.86 25.74 31.81 30.31 54.60 12.45 17.10 5.76 31.79 31.33 36.88 1.95
RANK: 86th 236th -- 177th 59th 98th 84th 192nd 41st 251st 60th 259th 297th 73rd 88th 187th 251st 271st

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Memphis, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Haslametrics has them ranked 99th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 18-14. They are also ranked by this site as the #5 team (out of 11) in the AAC (average ranking 151.7).

Memphis has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #86 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 96 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Memphis has been able to successfully prevent opponents from making shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. They're ranked 41st in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 31.8% of their attempts from that distance. Memphis has also had some success this season preventing opponents from converting many of their overall field goal attempts. The team ranks #59 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 40.5% of their total attempts from the floor.

Memphis plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 127th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 102 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Memphis appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 20.66 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 11th in the NCAA), and they convert 8.5% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 30th) as well. Memphis also has one of the better squads in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score. The team is ranked 30th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 85.75 vs. AO. And when they do shoot, they make a fair portion of their shots. Ranked in the top-100 in field goal shooting percentage, the squad converts about 44.9% of their total attempts vs. AO.

On the road, Memphis performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 339th in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Memphis is typically better vs. teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. Against foes that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 11.67, Memphis performs above their norm 82% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 29% of the time.
When facing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Memphis often performs better than normal. Memphis is more efficient than usual 77% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 99.54. In their other contests, Memphis performs better than the norm 26% of the time.
Memphis does worse vs. clubs that find ways to get to the free throw line. When playing squads that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.24, Memphis performs above average 32% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2565th65th9th10thAAC27th32nd80th15th136th56th
2023-2490th90th47th46thAAC21st55th94th37th158th71st
2022-2318th18th37th15thAAC35th24th59th14th29th24th
2021-2227th27th73rd34thAAC89th342nd48th43rd327th35th
2020-2133rd33rd41st44thAAC54th93rd103rd38th50th66th
2019-2064th64th54th43rdAAC36th312th83rd317th329th40th
2018-1953rd53rd98th72ndAAC10th22nd76th93rd353rd83rd
2017-18150th150th98th104thAAC286th217th138th82nd203rd156th
2016-17112th112th118th86thAAC169th320th105th273rd333rd85th
2015-1666th66th146th124thAAC25th276th131st180th87th86th
2014-1599th99th136th126thAAC122nd216th142nd339th339th80th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2578th39th286th257th46th324th62nd121st78th133rd77th34th19th3rd324th99th118th51st
2023-2473rd47th144th199th81st154th153rd274th239th82nd67th20th77th16th145th276th79th137th
2022-2322nd61st88th193rd4th340th16th82nd87th68th19th8th311th121st337th76th63rd18th
2021-2238th9th203rd226th16th350th29th107th93rd23rd62nd12th8th4th346th106th17th3rd
2020-21102nd87th351st112th72nd259th37th160th157th51st168th4th22nd27th275th175th65th56th
2019-20203rd74th283rd294th133rd275th205th210th339th104th52nd116th35th17th257th195th74th71st
2018-1966th59th140th122nd59th263rd237th290th184th5th115th24th78th83rd277th301st8th10th
2017-18115th4th285th304th77th309th239th233rd174th49th95th172nd50th63rd296th213th27th27th
2016-17112th48th269th110th93rd334th336th90th195th36th47th96th123rd69th336th98th40th16th
2015-1690th5th115th105th158th322nd140th115th304th20th183rd13th40th141st328th127th25th14th
2014-15127th259th300th30th88th293rd234th111th160th12th106th77th11th30th316th141st36th19th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2555th139th--114th57th298th56th122nd69th74th94th188th310th195th312th129th89th63rd
2023-24123rd45th--182nd112th339th181st43rd144th127th141st199th331st344th339th39th125th48th
2022-2337th205th--137th12th320th10th73rd21st118th46th57th347th148th322nd66th118th56th
2021-2232nd225th--71st24th308th80th50th35th78th26th327th140th32nd332nd72nd100th44th
2020-211st183rd--12th16th214th4th78th196th30th25th43rd40th10th310th145th85th47th
2019-205th161st--190th2nd234th9th149th61st166th1st189th298th22nd224th153rd156th141st
2018-1949th238th--85th41st212th53rd40th55th191st33rd263rd316th76th254th55th236th178th
2017-18195th156th--285th110th340th222nd26th18th241st80th351st333rd221st335th9th200th91st
2016-17117th113th--218th98th309th174th80th162nd191st58th138th117th93rd300th61st174th92nd
2015-1651st224th--126th45th115th20th231st149th158th45th123rd149th69th137th246th160th187th
2014-1586th236th--177th59th98th84th192nd41st251st60th259th297th73rd88th187th251st271st