TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Memphis  29-6 (0.829)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.824 (65th)
 Schedule Strength: 0.621 (79th)
 Record Quality: 0.480 (10th)
 Avg. Season Rank: 57.21 (56th)
Pace: 69.55 (28th)
 Momentum: -2.16 (276th)
 Off. Momentum: -1.63 (288th)
 Def. Momentum: -0.53 (197th)
Consistency: -8.23 (33rd)
 Res. Consistency: -11.03 (73rd)
 Away From Home: 0.10 (138th)
 Paper Tiger Factor: 1.89 (15th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 113.56 31.95 69.03 85.58 47.38 28.47 36.56 23.92 40.04 33.18 61.94 15.70 19.41 9.41 33.27 27.96 38.77 1.95
RANK: 78th 38th 286th 256th 46th 325th 62nd 121st 78th 134th 78th 33rd 20th 3rd 324th 99th 120th 50th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.44 26.42 -- 85.85 40.87 36.45 31.80 19.99 34.28 29.41 56.58 12.19 16.47 6.12 42.45 23.29 34.26 2.08
RANK: 56th 139th -- 114th 56th 298th 58th 122nd 68th 73rd 99th 186th 310th 197th 314th 129th 90th 60th

ANALYSIS:
Memphis is a moderately good team, capable of testing many an opponent that they'll encounter. Ranked 65th overall (out of 364) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 29-6. Of the 13 schools in the AAC (average ranking 159.4), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.

Memphis will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 56th in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 101 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Memphis does a pretty solid job providing themselves chances to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked 33rd in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 15.70. Memphis has also had some success this season preventing opponents from converting many of their overall field goal attempts. The team ranks #56 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 40.9% of their total attempts from the floor.

Memphis plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 78th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 114 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Memphis does an outstanding job finishing any scoring chances they obtain from offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 9.4% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked third nationally), and with a rating of 19.41, they're 20th in potential points scored off of the offensive glass as well. Memphis also does a really good job to acquire opportunities from the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 31.95 vs. AO, they are ranked 38th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe. Unfortunately, they don't convert a ton of their free throws and make just 69.0% of their attempts.

Memphis is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 33rd in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Memphis is typically better vs. teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint. Against foes that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.20%, Memphis performs above their norm 77% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team never performs better than the norm.
When facing teams that shoot the ball well from the field, Memphis often performs better than normal. Memphis is more efficient than usual 75% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.16%. In their other contests, Memphis performs better than the norm 13% of the time.
Memphis does worse vs. clubs that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.75, Memphis performs above average 30% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 83% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2565th65th8th10thAAC28th33rd79th15th138th56th
2023-2490th90th47th46thAAC21st55th94th37th158th71st
2022-2318th18th37th15thAAC35th24th59th14th29th24th
2021-2227th27th73rd34thAAC89th342nd48th43rd327th35th
2020-2133rd33rd41st44thAAC54th93rd103rd38th50th66th
2019-2064th64th54th43rdAAC36th312th83rd317th329th40th
2018-1953rd53rd98th72ndAAC10th22nd76th93rd353rd83rd
2017-18150th150th98th104thAAC286th217th138th82nd203rd156th
2016-17112th112th118th86thAAC169th320th105th273rd333rd85th
2015-1666th66th146th124thAAC25th276th131st180th87th86th
2014-1599th99th136th126thAAC122nd216th142nd339th339th80th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2578th38th286th256th46th325th62nd121st78th134th78th33rd20th3rd324th99th120th50th
2023-2473rd47th144th199th81st154th153rd274th239th82nd67th20th77th16th145th276th79th137th
2022-2322nd61st88th193rd4th340th16th82nd87th68th19th8th311th121st337th76th63rd18th
2021-2238th9th203rd226th16th350th29th107th93rd23rd62nd12th8th4th346th106th17th3rd
2020-21102nd87th351st112th72nd259th37th160th157th51st168th4th22nd27th275th175th65th56th
2019-20203rd74th283rd294th133rd275th205th210th339th104th52nd116th35th17th257th195th74th71st
2018-1966th59th140th122nd59th263rd237th290th184th5th115th24th78th83rd277th301st8th10th
2017-18115th4th285th304th77th309th239th233rd174th49th95th172nd50th63rd296th213th27th27th
2016-17112th48th269th110th93rd334th336th90th195th36th47th96th123rd69th336th98th40th16th
2015-1690th5th115th105th158th322nd140th115th304th20th183rd13th40th141st328th127th25th14th
2014-15127th259th300th30th88th293rd234th111th160th12th106th77th11th30th316th141st36th19th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2556th139th--114th56th298th58th122nd68th73rd99th186th310th197th314th129th90th60th
2023-24123rd45th--182nd112th339th181st43rd144th127th141st199th331st344th339th39th125th48th
2022-2337th205th--137th12th320th10th73rd21st118th46th57th347th148th322nd66th118th56th
2021-2232nd225th--71st24th308th80th50th35th78th26th327th140th32nd332nd72nd100th44th
2020-211st183rd--12th16th214th4th78th196th30th25th43rd40th10th310th145th85th47th
2019-205th161st--190th2nd234th9th149th61st166th1st189th298th22nd224th153rd156th141st
2018-1949th238th--85th41st212th53rd40th55th191st33rd263rd316th76th254th55th236th178th
2017-18195th156th--285th110th340th222nd26th18th241st80th351st333rd221st335th9th200th91st
2016-17117th113th--218th98th309th174th80th162nd191st58th138th117th93rd300th61st174th92nd
2015-1651st224th--126th45th115th20th231st149th158th45th123rd149th69th137th246th160th187th
2014-1586th236th--177th59th98th84th192nd41st251st60th259th297th73rd88th187th251st271st
© Copyright 2025 Erik Haslam, All Rights Reserved
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.