TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Norfolk State  17-17 (0.500)  |  MEAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.117 (309th)
Schedule Strength: 0.318 (329th)
Record Quality: -0.134 (240th)
Avg. Season Rank: 317.14 (322nd)
Pace: 70.72 (144th)
Momentum: 0.96 (127th)
Off. Momentum: 0.87 (165th)
Def. Momentum: 0.08 (127th)
Consistency: -9.04 (189th)
Res. Consistency: -7.60 (3rd)
Away From Home: -0.78 (239th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -4.74 (340th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 91.46 28.05 68.13 79.43 39.95 26.32 33.78 26.55 35.65 26.57 50.35 9.95 15.19 5.80 33.13 33.42 33.45 2.00
RANK: 323rd 142nd 256th 274th 321st 270th 236th 82nd 210th 255th 340th 222nd 137th 254th 251st 66th 220th 147th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.18 30.79 -- 83.61 43.65 32.45 37.25 20.61 35.74 30.56 55.79 11.75 17.64 7.28 38.81 24.65 36.54 2.02
RANK: 247th 290th -- 249th 138th 299th 279th 60th 125th 263rd 63rd 250th 337th 232nd 274th 40th 239th 162nd

ANALYSIS:
Norfolk State is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 309th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 17-17. Of the 13 schools in the MEAC (average ranking 318.9), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.318 (which ranks 329th in the nation), Norfolk State has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.

Norfolk State is not one of the most productive teams on offense. Scoring fewer than 92 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are rated at #323 in offensive efficiency. Norfolk State will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked 340th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 50.3% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 39.9% of their total attempts vs. AO.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, Norfolk State still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 106 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #247 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Norfolk State gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 17.64 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (337th nationally).
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Norfolk State performs worse against squads that are typically efficient on offense. When facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 95.58, Norfolk State is more efficient than normal 33% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 90% of the time.
When playing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, Norfolk State usually performs better than average. Norfolk State is more efficient than normal 86% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.82%. In all other contests, Norfolk State performs better than average 30% of the time.
Norfolk State is typically better vs. teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. Against foes that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.69%, Norfolk State performs above their norm 86% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 30% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25193rd193rd53rd139thMEAC278th173rd304th94th135th186th
2023-24238th236th52nd153rdMEAC297th311th340th22nd279th211th
2022-23234th234th63rd167thMEAC295th277th334th362nd260th241st
2021-22189th189th20th122ndMEAC204th110th357th335th321st228th
2020-21229th229th63rd147thMEAC191st138th299th262nd115th249th
2019-20257th257th183rd251stMEAC227th24th345th282nd312th256th
2018-19269th267th98th185thMEAC112th96th341st300th161st298th
2017-18308th308th244th286thMEAC159th74th347th239th239th323rd
2016-17309th309th179th240thMEAC144th189th329th340th239th322nd
2015-16251st249th186th229thMEAC169th33rd307th324th246th237th
2014-15193rd193rd120th181stMEAC193rd65th309th289th114th205th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25172nd152nd75th168th100th359th336th53rd31st19th221st134th185th125th362nd54th20th4th
2023-24228th95th172nd218th222nd329th239th51st112th200th291st155th146th158th326th48th191st79th
2022-23188th71st70th271st174th315th302nd97th26th203rd253rd126th87th62nd304th71st185th95th
2021-22211th115th258th259th155th269th248th124th219th182nd102nd269th125th207th253rd112th156th111th
2020-21276th148th209th232nd308th293rd23rd63rd345th262nd336th107th258th315th281st51st242nd140th
2019-20308th219th109th184th342nd104th304th202nd254th238th336th47th181st318th94th201st241st264th
2018-19291st149th142nd258th320th240th157th51st289th311th309th122nd127th129th220th44th290th221st
2017-18314th307th317th145th310th242nd133rd134th233rd102nd347th169th149th225th249th133rd116th99th
2016-17323rd142nd256th274th321st270th236th82nd210th255th340th222nd137th254th251st66th220th147th
2015-16184th73rd3rd235th289th190th256th169th238th201st294th174th151st235th172nd163rd187th175th
2014-15162nd103rd330th242nd70th300th209th143rd122nd95th62nd290th170th110th288th127th71st55th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25250th273rd--260th128th357th144th60th153rd83rd245th184th319th130th355th40th59th18th
2023-24252nd332nd--39th163rd349th290th1st96th126th153rd103rd156th240th361st1st184th23rd
2022-23262nd327th--156th131st359th255th26th132nd25th252nd186th276th129th361st24th23rd5th
2021-22152nd278th--222nd98th354th63rd22nd60th90th281st75th300th70th354th11th73rd13th
2020-21144th247th--203rd67th343rd51st34th214th152nd76th5th320th124th338th27th137th40th
2019-20172nd302nd--50th143rd293rd146th31st45th89th289th111th260th153rd333rd43rd127th48th
2018-19213th330th--67th185th313th253rd32nd214th78th186th68th206th205th339th39th112th36th
2017-18263rd335th--69th192nd312th303rd28th180th119th129th103rd244th60th330th29th153rd72nd
2016-17247th290th--249th138th299th279th60th125th263rd63rd250th337th232nd274th40th239th162nd
2015-16303rd277th--131st258th301st347th52nd300th177th93rd97th113th179th310th44th185th96th
2014-15244th241st--199th172nd320th209th66th281st155th112th172nd193rd196th314th50th145th69th