TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 North Dakota St.  23-10 (0.697)  |  Summit League
All-Play Percentage: 0.557 (157th)
Schedule Strength: 0.425 (243rd)
Record Quality: 0.122 (110th)
Avg. Season Rank: 176.03 (172nd)
Pace: 62.97 (315th)
Momentum: 0.58 (130th)
Off. Momentum: -1.32 (293rd)
Def. Momentum: 1.90 (27th)
Consistency: -9.99 (267th)
Res. Consistency: -10.41 (90th)
Away From Home: -2.04 (327th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.04 (195th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.63 26.84 69.68 81.78 42.05 30.23 36.87 25.69 35.82 25.86 54.30 8.43 12.19 5.99 36.97 31.41 31.62 2.05
RANK: 194th 248th 166th 175th 227th 89th 67th 162nd 151st 278th 282nd 324th 312th 242nd 89th 166th 287th 279th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.48 26.24 -- 83.58 42.33 26.23 35.08 30.87 36.31 26.49 56.54 9.16 13.99 6.68 31.38 36.93 31.69 2.00
RANK: 137th 79th -- 238th 122nd 102nd 199th 339th 206th 96th 105th 29th 81st 166th 74th 337th 78th 177th

ANALYSIS:
North Dakota St. is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 157th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 23-10. They are also ranked by this site as the #2 team (out of nine) in the Summit League (average ranking 210.7).

North Dakota St. will likely call on their defense to win a majority of their games. The team is ranked 137th in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 100 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. North Dakota St. makes a point to avoid fouls and prevent opponents from getting to the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 26.24 vs. AO, they are currently rated 79th in the country in that category. If North Dakota St. does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's unwillingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of the opposition's turnovers. The squad only has a rating of 8.43 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 28th-worst in the college game.

North Dakota St. doesn't perform as well offensively as they do defensively. The team is ranked 194th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 99 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. North Dakota St. does a fairly poor job cleaning the offensive glass. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 12.19 in potential points scored off of second chances (312th nationally). If North Dakota St. does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's care for the ball. The squad has a rating of 9.16 in potential points allowed off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 29th in the college game.

On the road, North Dakota St. performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 327th in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
North Dakota St. does better vs. clubs that allow more chances at the line. When playing squads that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 32.01, North Dakota St. performs above average 73% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 35% of the time.
North Dakota St. performs worse against squads that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.07%, North Dakota St. is more efficient than normal 22% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 59% of the time.
When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, North Dakota St. usually performs worse than average. North Dakota St. is more efficient than normal 29% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.61%. In all other contests, North Dakota St. performs better than average 65% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25143rd143rd75th125thSummit League313th361st239th125th94th140th
2023-24288th288th226th246thSummit League273rd83rd223rd54th140th257th
2022-23210th210th207th228thSummit League141st340th244th336th208th223rd
2021-22139th137th56th119thSummit League211th190th271st279th85th165th
2020-21121st118th142nd135thSummit League329th109th143rd221st206th152nd
2019-20104th104th31st83rdSummit League297th59th233rd156th144th132nd
2018-19204th204th148th193rdSummit League299th298th235th283rd302nd206th
2017-18173rd173rd206th217thSummit League258th290th164th322nd92nd146th
2016-17191st190th80th114thSummit League233rd345th156th314th213th177th
2015-16153rd153rd111th143rdSummit League335th1st195th65th306th164th
2014-15157th157th48th110thSummit League315th267th243rd195th327th172nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2563rd310th12th98th135th2nd18th317th287th337th108th362nd334th350th2nd321st340th364th
2023-24229th278th143rd337th112th225th63rd140th53rd318th184th339th339th306th163rd110th284th253rd
2022-23201st122nd170th332nd137th242nd207th98th76th350th66th356th261st183rd183rd56th332nd278th
2021-22171st146th34th291st145th172nd123rd178th165th287th123rd352nd292nd210th137th154th261st250th
2020-21118th139th37th97th183rd163rd212th177th123rd112th228th349th122nd195th190th193rd142nd152nd
2019-2068th117th2nd153rd205th28th66th300th177th212th262nd329th319th344th29th308th222nd306th
2018-19144th130th27th312th167th29th119th292nd30th326th178th353rd315th271st10th279th299th343rd
2017-18179th185th48th333rd142nd86th102nd313th128th254th173rd300th325th336th46th300th194th283rd
2016-17194th148th165th276th191st152nd176th247th64th205th260th316th311th313th123rd235th175th210th
2015-16215th233rd210th151st218th189th250th162nd137th133rd221st261st264th277th189th173rd140th142nd
2014-15194th248th166th175th227th89th67th162nd151st278th282nd324th312th242nd89th166th287th279th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25278th71st--360th191st304th225th343rd270th132nd215th318th308th82nd202nd312th51st87th
2023-24334th77th--340th324th53rd356th354th331st210th220th325th35th63rd23rd347th138th279th
2022-23238th62nd--353rd155th199th137th353rd306th115th155th301st69th128th110th341st44th125th
2021-22158th106th--332nd136th16th51st335th188th315th77th102nd334th76th7th328th284th336th
2020-21138th57th--318th127th182nd58th339th286th93rd123rd187th26th61st114th331st44th121st
2019-20163rd56th--306th186th54th42nd310th141st286th256th45th165th111th23rd289th247th315th
2018-19311th180th--312th229th172nd272nd241st313th274th113th160th308th236th111th205th229th242nd
2017-18205th253rd--247th127th120th143rd306th278th116th58th345th131st65th95th303rd105th163rd
2016-17196th96th--283rd135th270th269th186th171st195th67th236th281st228th227th163rd149th142nd
2015-16108th126th--274th82nd94th34th343rd209th86th119th189th207th136th63rd341st51st150th
2014-15137th79th--238th122nd102nd199th339th206th96th105th29th81st166th74th337th78th177th