TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 New Orleans  10-23 (0.303)  |  Southland
All-Play Percentage: 0.083 (332nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.322 (297th)
Record Quality: -0.404 (340th)
Avg. Season Rank: 318.88 (321st)
Pace: 70.93 (29th)
Momentum: 1.59 (100th)
Off. Momentum: 0.15 (188th)
Def. Momentum: 1.44 (77th)
Consistency: -10.28 (298th)
Res. Consistency: -12.71 (221st)
Away From Home: 1.09 (62nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.26 (116th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.62 29.37 70.95 84.70 40.31 24.70 30.36 25.59 34.40 34.41 51.85 13.55 16.19 5.97 29.16 30.21 40.62 1.89
RANK: 313th 65th 234th 219th 334th 343rd 339th 109th 329th 54th 336th 75th 64th 132nd 347th 95th 54th 16th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 114.61 29.04 -- 85.08 49.10 27.33 36.29 19.04 40.89 38.71 62.17 11.07 16.02 7.14 32.12 22.37 45.50 1.87
RANK: 349th 288th -- 157th 358th 26th 295th 31st 279th 362nd 313th 153rd 333rd 345th 32nd 25th 362nd 359th

ANALYSIS:
New Orleans presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. They have a record of 10-23 and are ranked 332nd overall (out of 362) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 10 schools in the Southland (average ranking 276.3), they're currently ranked as our #7 team in the conference.

New Orleans has a very sieve-like defense that gives up points way too easily. The team is ranked 349th in efficiency on that end of the court and gives up more than 114 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. New Orleans is one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #358 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 49.1% of their total attempts from the floor. New Orleans is also one of the very worst teams in the game when it comes to preventing opponents from scoring off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 7.1% of all second-chance opportunities (345th nationally), and with a rating of 16.02, they're 333rd in potential points surrendered off of the offensive boards as well.

New Orleans doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #313 in the nation in offensive efficiency. New Orleans is a lousy shooting team, incapable of converting efficiently from anyplace on the floor and ranking in the bottom-50 in each of our four most noteworthy field goal shooting categories. They make just 30.4% of their three-pointers (ranking 339th nationally), 34.4% of their mid-range attempts (329th), 51.9% of their near-proximity chances (336th), and 40.3% of their total shots from the field (334th) vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
New Orleans is typically worse vs. teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.14%, New Orleans performs above their norm 20% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 64% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, New Orleans often performs worse than normal. New Orleans is more efficient than usual 11% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.06. In their other contests, New Orleans performs better than the norm 55% of the time.
New Orleans does worse vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.65, New Orleans performs above average 26% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 70% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25350th350th359th344thSouthland67th277th151st191st60th355th
2023-24332nd332nd318th340thSouthland29th298th297th116th62nd321st
2022-23322nd321st280th334thSouthland13th244th346th313th114th341st
2021-22283rd283rd148th233rdSouthland7th5th351st265th332nd262nd
2020-21270th270th247th299thSouthland33rd86th324th271st295th302nd
2019-20322nd321st307th332ndSouthland86th10th227th274th53rd295th
2018-19264th263rd127th205thSouthland127th112th301st305th320th278th
2017-18256th256th195th227thSouthland247th22nd276th107th43rd238th
2016-17196th196th85th192ndSouthland295th243rd305th343rd305th232nd
2015-16318th318th284th337thSouthland22nd179th336th171st183rd303rd
2014-15316th316th266th314thSouthland21st63rd316th253rd307th321st
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25311th159th328th147th292nd343rd344th143rd330th13th294th94th132nd263rd349th142nd15th10th
2023-24313th65th234th219th334th343rd339th109th329th54th336th75th64th132nd347th95th54th16th
2022-23320th188th202nd345th205th355th203rd96th103rd112th316th235th51st51st352nd50th55th14th
2021-22286th11th98th355th195th358th349th66th148th30th303rd96th317th334th358th34th3rd1st
2020-21251st169th74th334th111th354th245th56th159th179th124th85th234th254th351st21st109th21st
2019-20246th101st82nd299th189th351st283rd18th52nd228th278th152nd202nd214th351st6th186th26th
2018-19305th225th257th188th274th345th213th26th233rd137th301st109th60th45th348th21st131st30th
2017-18281st84th318th260th210th350th255th16th127th163rd279th180th153rd131st350th10th137th14th
2016-17225th107th135th247th141st349th348th115th203rd10th149th46th114th192nd350th101st4th2nd
2015-16325th60th243rd181st333rd339th347th174th329th9th341st66th11th57th338th181st7th4th
2014-15304th125th132nd255th292nd337th290th268th274th3rd342nd125th214th246th336th260th2nd3rd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25354th75th--349th326th350th357th111th317th203rd284th251st332nd349th322nd60th126th71st
2023-24349th288th--157th358th26th295th31st279th362nd313th153rd333rd345th32nd25th362nd359th
2022-23314th345th--19th347th127th302nd15th362nd219th224th360th281st350th223rd33rd309th244th
2021-22257th259th--179th219th305th192nd24th150th246th264th243rd331st293rd301st14th242nd119th
2020-21278th307th--123rd304th85th135th139th319th270th274th338th323rd331st83rd154th292nd293rd
2019-20338th327th--62nd348th100th297th10th346th323rd311th132nd256th344th138th14th341st317th
2018-19184th335th--45th238th42nd70th9th41st334th235th291st345th352nd81st14th350th343rd
2017-18222nd266th--15th312th103rd326th8th291st276th190th272nd257th295th197th17th324th288th
2016-17146th105th--116th203rd277th94th38th305th193rd201st292nd267th274th296th43rd209th130th
2015-16300th246th--67th325th167th334th10th217th283rd245th333rd295th340th219th13th311th265th
2014-15290th264th--30th346th35th344th4th301st338th261st308th169th344th61st8th347th343rd