TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Nevada  17-16 (0.515)  |  Mountain West
All-Play Percentage: 0.780 (81st)
 Schedule Strength: 0.596 (89th)
 Record Quality: 0.097 (126th)
 Avg. Season Rank: 64.37 (62nd)
Pace: 64.39 (318th)
 Momentum: -3.30 (314th)
 Off. Momentum: -1.34 (277th)
 Def. Momentum: -1.96 (267th)
Consistency: -9.64 (205th)
 Res. Consistency: -13.02 (210th)
 Away From Home: -1.50 (282nd)
 Paper Tiger Factor: -1.19 (198th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 113.50 30.46 69.42 86.11 47.67 30.71 33.40 26.63 45.79 28.77 64.65 11.66 12.33 5.48 35.66 30.93 33.41 2.02
RANK: 80th 65th 275th 231st 39th 274th 216th 48th 6th 301st 31st 213th 288th 232nd 268th 38th 292nd 185th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.69 29.51 -- 82.73 42.14 36.58 34.79 19.44 32.58 26.72 59.16 10.03 10.95 3.76 44.21 23.50 32.30 2.12
RANK: 89th 274th -- 23rd 92nd 303rd 222nd 94th 32nd 22nd 188th 42nd 10th 7th 342nd 142nd 39th 21st

ANALYSIS:
Despite what their win percentage might indicate, Nevada is a good team that can cause more than enough trouble for most opponents. They have a record of 17-16 and are ranked 81st overall (out of 364) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #6 team (out of 11) in the MWC (average ranking 124.7).

Nevada succeeds primarily through their offense. They are ranked 80th in offensive efficiency and score in excess of 113 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Nevada is an excellent shooting team, capable of converting from multiple locations on the court and ranking in the top-50 in three of our four primary field goal categories. They are most proficient from two-point range, making good on 45.8% of their mid-range jumpers (sixth in the nation), 64.7% of their near-proximity chances (31st), and 47.7% of their total shots from the field (39th) vs. AO. Nevada also favors the mid-range jumper over any of the others. The club is ranked 38th in ratio of mid-range attempts to total field goal attempts.

Nevada plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 89th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 104 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Nevada does a fantastic job to prevent opposing teams from capitalizing on chances from offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 3.8% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked seventh in the NCAA), and with a rating of 10.95, they're tenth in potential points allowed off of the offensive glass as well. Nevada also has extremely pesky defenders that ceaselessly attempt to deny opponents ample opportunity to shoot. The club is ranked 23rd in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 82.73 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities, Nevada often performs better than normal. Nevada is more efficient than usual 77% of the time when facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 10.69. In their other contests, Nevada performs better than the norm 27% of the time.
Nevada does better vs. clubs that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When playing squads that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.30%, Nevada performs above average 86% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 42% of the time.
Nevada performs worse against squads that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.63%, Nevada is more efficient than normal 33% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 76% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2581st81st183rd126thMWC318th205th89th198th282nd62nd
2023-2440th40th19th28thMWC229th274th96th308th228th38th
2022-2369th69th63rd35thMWC206th147th62nd144th312th57th
2021-22102nd102nd245th172ndMWC26th98th61st221st5th104th
2020-2199th99th107th102ndMWC68th186th116th21st198th120th
2019-2076th76th102nd97thMWC34th289th104th255th284th75th
2018-1937th37th7th19thMWC86th329th100th122nd311th20th
2017-1830th30th17th17thMWC145th192nd64th67th133rd27th
2016-1764th64th17th31stMWC78th24th100th186th184th69th
2015-16127th127th94th95thMWC44th20th121st214th140th133rd
2014-15283rd283rd313th283rdMWC186th83rd122nd180th321st259th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2580th65th275th231st39th274th216th48th6th301st31st213th288th232nd268th38th292nd185th
2023-2437th4th184th344th24th277th8th95th51st322nd32nd195th183rd168th236th60th293rd209th
2022-2377th22nd3rd339th70th254th82nd139th8th317th172nd226th343rd302nd207th104th269th227th
2021-2288th89th46th317th45th225th69th176th18th261st83rd129th221st136th188th144th210th198th
2020-2186th7th59th286th120th181st121st204th51st238th212th145th147th244th149th187th197th215th
2019-2056th200th30th155th77th83rd7th216th53rd214th230th293rd142nd154th88th222nd224th263rd
2018-1940th2nd229th262nd60th126th124th272nd74th172nd58th144th85th53rd101st265th148th209th
2017-1810th33rd67th52nd54th77th39th158th146th207th30th156th114th66th97th189th243rd266th
2016-1741st16th171st130th95th86th31st102nd65th319th95th179th23rd64th89th110th323rd307th
2015-16188th48th69th208th238th317th304th16th237th296th85th140th197th150th317th10th292nd120th
2014-15289th13th124th196th315th347th347th19th306th123rd280th131st6th71st347th14th109th14th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2589th274th--23rd92nd303rd222nd94th32nd22nd188th42nd10th7th342nd142nd39th21st
2023-2433rd244th--67th35th200th42nd149th133rd106th30th66th104th60th242nd177th140th123rd
2022-2369th76th--93rd87th300th69th66th198th82nd140th13th11th57th319th83rd111th55th
2021-22117th117th--107th124th288th158th103rd211th95th106th115th30th34th304th110th104th56th
2020-21141st349th--23rd68th268th208th72nd39th32nd109th207th107th141st328th118th75th33rd
2019-20105th238th--238th32nd330th11th209th93rd49th167th86th219th141st322nd188th42nd25th
2018-1945th22nd--225th61st174th150th231st114th188th34th34th106th109th156th222nd166th193rd
2017-18104th46th--319th88th284th24th261st143rd157th162nd34th309th256th232nd233rd107th112th
2016-1794th26th--316th97th280th32nd239th242nd188th133rd131st214th104th224th192nd125th129th
2015-1674th156th--251st51st158th40th279th85th172nd75th281st202nd86th132nd270th137th177th
2014-15215th266th--303rd137th169th210th245th86th249th139th274th347th244th125th206th200th219th
© Copyright 2025 Erik Haslam, All Rights Reserved
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.