TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 UNLV  19-13 (0.594)  |  Mountain West
All-Play Percentage: 0.732 (98th)
Schedule Strength: 0.622 (80th)
Record Quality: 0.208 (80th)
Avg. Season Rank: 75.56 (73rd)
Pace: 69.39 (84th)
Momentum: -3.74 (326th)
Off. Momentum: -2.99 (346th)
Def. Momentum: -0.76 (184th)
Consistency: -10.48 (319th)
Res. Consistency: -10.73 (103rd)
Away From Home: 2.88 (2nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.15 (210th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.10 28.03 72.93 83.74 43.35 33.70 35.77 21.39 36.96 28.66 57.04 15.15 16.59 5.08 40.24 25.54 34.22 2.06
RANK: 133rd 68th 140th 222nd 201st 93rd 87th 268th 227th 217th 232nd 18th 53rd 202nd 78th 264th 210th 263rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.25 24.31 -- 80.82 42.76 32.37 35.06 22.06 38.16 26.39 56.03 9.66 15.69 6.21 40.05 27.30 32.65 2.07
RANK: 85th 138th -- 44th 113th 240th 243rd 106th 200th 56th 81st 88th 300th 293rd 298th 145th 83rd 58th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, UNLV should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. They have a record of 19-13 and are ranked 98th overall (out of 363) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #6 team (out of 11) in the MWC (average ranking 87.7).

The primary strength for UNLV is defense. The team is ranked 85th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 99 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UNLV thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked 18th in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 15.15. UNLV also does a really good job to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 44th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 80.82 vs. AO.

UNLV plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 133rd nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 105 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UNLV does an adequate job of creating chances for themselves off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 16.59 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 53rd in the NCAA). UNLV also acquires a fair amount of chances from the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 28.03 vs. AO, they are ranked 68th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 72.9%.

UNLV has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 326th in the country in positive momentum. UNLV has also been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 319th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most. When playing on the road, UNLV has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked second in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, UNLV usually performs better than average. UNLV is more efficient than normal 91% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.54%. In all other contests, UNLV performs better than average 40% of the time.
UNLV is typically worse vs. teams that allow more chances at the line. Against foes that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 24.90, UNLV performs above their norm 27% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 75% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to get off more shots, UNLV often performs worse than normal. UNLV is more efficient than usual 33% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 85.76. In their other contests, UNLV performs better than the norm 68% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-2588th88th154th113thMWC262nd53rd90th272nd302nd92nd
2023-2470th70th104th81stMWC304th257th84th1st107th80th
2022-2398th98th122nd80thMWC84th319th80th210th2nd73rd
2021-2287th87th148th98thMWC208th241st87th230th279th125th
2020-21188th186th215th204thMWC303rd157th134th126th104th144th
2019-2086th85th166th112thMWC236th291st92nd165th320th122nd
2018-19190th190th139th142ndMWC200th327th190th217th227th167th
2017-1898th98th109th82ndMWC21st138th98th302nd58th53rd
2016-17230th230th285th220thMWC108th150th110th304th183rd212th
2015-16119th119th157th121stMWC18th80th95th81st165th92nd
2014-15110th110th147th121stMWC143rd204th94th171st231st130th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25146th71st204th176th129th321st232nd126th111th78th185th70th229th163rd327th117th83rd40th
2023-2474th81st170th162nd54th257th131st143rd46th112th95th227th48th15th270th147th114th92nd
2022-23133rd68th140th222nd201st93rd87th268th227th217th232nd18th53rd202nd78th264th210th263rd
2021-2293rd126th134th122nd186th39th74th220th111th307th197th106th119th291st45th226th317th329th
2020-21164th344th231st38th172nd112th174th60th96th291st138th126th51st56th159th76th322nd281st
2019-2064th63rd197th70th116th142nd184th279th76th29th205th225th31st26th166th301st48th97th
2018-19165th68th308th79th244th129th230th128th308th190th153rd184th80th182nd158th153rd220th215th
2017-1880th14th193rd266th34th339th242nd187th167th12th41st230th4th2nd334th163rd10th2nd
2016-17289th83rd160th236th320th229th275th154th243rd180th333rd199th155th297th215th141st157th141st
2015-16167th82nd309th275th127th143rd255th316th210th75th113th32nd211th113th119th312th49th138th
2014-15100th167th336th162nd67th173rd46th169th111th168th93rd160th221st112th176th173rd172nd174th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2559th94th--189th60th315th34th154th79th76th129th64th307th162nd313th157th76th58th
2023-2493rd97th--295th40th296th45th155th45th200th58th174th357th234th270th122nd165th119th
2022-2385th138th--44th113th240th243rd106th200th56th81st88th300th293rd298th145th83rd58th
2021-2273rd216th--192nd45th251st23rd265th105th68th107th193rd335th217th240th268th61st66th
2020-21246th166th--221st149th330th347th248th106th28th141st53rd104th128th318th233rd17th21st
2019-20117th291st--70th78th233rd154th99th79th91st81st150th77th109th277th130th126th84th
2018-19243rd121st--341st191st152nd222nd285th151st295th171st209th207th216th73rd241st232nd266th
2017-18146th20th--339th122nd74th250th328th55th249th87th281st336th205th30th309th177th280th
2016-17151st18th--300th171st140th274th247th142nd273rd110th155th230th149th84th206th234th255th
2015-1687th179th--177th87th87th61st177th115th264th55th175th285th253rd82nd179th262nd282nd
2014-15111th59th--345th58th159th268th229th74th332nd4th82nd243rd28th73rd143rd299th295th