TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
2024-25      2023-24      2022-23      2021-22
2020-21      2019-20      2018-19      2017-18
2016-17      2015-16      2014-15     
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Omaha  22-13 (0.629)  |  Summit League
All-Play Percentage: 0.617 (140th)
 Schedule Strength: 0.413 (196th)
 Record Quality: 0.076 (135th)
 Avg. Season Rank: 200.56 (197th)
Pace: 66.95 (158th)
 Momentum: 6.90 (3rd)
 Off. Momentum: 2.38 (59th)
 Def. Momentum: 4.51 (4th)
Consistency: -8.76 (84th)
 Res. Consistency: -15.40 (322nd)
 Away From Home: 0.20 (124th)
 Paper Tiger Factor: -1.26 (207th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 112.36 29.28 72.88 88.47 44.60 34.66 34.90 22.34 38.30 31.47 59.76 10.28 14.12 4.68 39.18 25.25 35.57 2.04
RANK: 91st 97th 155th 111th 139th 148th 132nd 165th 141st 196th 138th 283rd 205th 302nd 171st 175th 222nd 215th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.38 28.91 -- 85.57 44.91 36.69 35.07 20.82 40.56 28.06 61.01 10.83 12.32 4.36 42.88 24.34 32.79 2.10
RANK: 226th 252nd -- 98th 215th 307th 234th 162nd 293rd 43rd 265th 82nd 32nd 28th 320th 186th 50th 40th

ANALYSIS:
Omaha is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 140th overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 22-13. Of the nine schools in the Summit League (average ranking 207.3), they're currently ranked as our #3 team in the conference.

The primary strength for Omaha this year is offense. The team is ranked 91st in efficiency on that end of the floor, and they'll rack up more than 112 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Omaha is fairly competent protecting the ball on offense, which minimizes opportunities for the opponent to score quickly off of steals. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 10.83, which ranks #82 in the country.

The defense for Omaha, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 226th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 110 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Omaha hasn't done terribly well defending the mid-range jumper. The squad is ranked 293rd nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 40.6% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. If Omaha does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to prevent opponents from converting second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The team has a defensive second-chance conversion percentage of 4.4% vs. AO, which ranks 28th-best in the nation.

Omaha has been playing some of its most efficient basketball of the season recently and is presently ranked third in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Omaha does better vs. clubs that prefer the outside shot. When playing squads that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.08, Omaha performs above average 91% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 32% of the time.
Omaha performs better against squads that convert well from the charity stripe. When facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.75%, Omaha is more efficient than normal 91% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 32% of the time.
When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Omaha usually performs worse than average. Omaha is more efficient than normal 27% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 66.93. In all other contests, Omaha performs better than average 72% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25140th140th93rd135thSummit League158th84th196th207th124th197th
2023-24249th249th241st297thSummit League176th326th283rd161st250th259th
2022-23314th314th335th326thSummit League125th126th230th258th178th305th
2021-22343rd343rd348th343rdSummit League46th330th200th99th348th341st
2020-21295th295th329th314thSummit League63rd145th133rd210th144th298th
2019-20224th224th192nd182ndSummit League121st220th147th266th313th201st
2018-19161st161st73rd130thSummit League212th201st259th111th219th163rd
2017-18273rd273rd315th292ndSummit League75th55th122nd171st109th247th
2016-17176th174th134th139thSummit League10th135th130th204th48th186th
2015-16131st131st144th157thSummit League5th74th165th132nd52nd118th
2014-15248th248th246th269thSummit League2nd31st272nd99th209th235th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2591st97th155th111th139th148th132nd165th141st196th138th283rd205th302nd171st175th222nd215th
2023-24232nd48th81st276th261st261st332nd53rd149th331st142nd244th293rd228th246th42nd319th239th
2022-23289th180th14th320th270th332nd229th89th315th199th230th334th271st229th317th57th160th72nd
2021-22297th293rd121st307th244th265th93rd75th237th310th261st305th309th205th237th49th286th199th
2020-21274th309th225th96th263rd328th165th50th285th82nd282nd208th239th282nd335th53rd113th34th
2019-20196th319th190th49th155th285th160th33rd48th175th243rd211th204th149th306th43rd215th99th
2018-1977th319th192nd21st67th179th29th54th6th157th241st310th95th47th233rd76th216th162nd
2017-18205th289th178th221st136th201st128th162nd177th168th149th237th235th169th181st155th155th150th
2016-17127th76th33rd281st164th196th91st268th197th111th252nd5th109th171st167th258th80th136th
2015-1684th89th30th215th52nd299th221st161st211th48th42nd2nd88th84th296th156th36th30th
2014-15213th76th100th292nd199th254th274th186th94th163rd221st29th122nd243rd229th158th115th112th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25226th252nd--98th215th307th234th162nd293rd43rd265th82nd32nd28th320th186th50th40th
2023-24267th204th--148th281st266th269th206th346th86th239th147th65th161st275th213th91st75th
2022-23331st245th--280th246th292nd303rd20th118th336th178th305th104th149th263rd12th320th226th
2021-22355th336th--207th334th133rd350th74th133rd330th296th270th279th301st118th68th333rd307th
2020-21302nd173rd--214th291st150th327th105th165th303rd243rd193rd113th238th120th87th301st279th
2019-20290th96th--300th234th302nd274th62nd80th289th220th176th85th172nd261st27th258th176th
2018-19287th60th--310th232nd325th203rd137th246th168th270th81st120th193rd298th99th123rd82nd
2017-18322nd70th--324th303rd203rd275th230th328th273rd249th265th262nd322nd125th188th225th230th
2016-17246th121st--203rd253rd230th173rd141st310th187th252nd228th347th316th228th131st173rd154th
2015-16266th225th--71st297th81st165th202nd332nd156th290th59th231st251st113th239th182nd212th
2014-15288th215th--70th325th109th293rd156th264th138th338th321st132nd257th141st207th180th195th
© Copyright 2025 Erik Haslam, All Rights Reserved
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.