TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Omaha  5-25 (0.167)  |  Summit League
All-Play Percentage: 0.042 (343rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.407 (200th)
Record Quality: -0.411 (343rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 337.53 (341st)
Pace: 70.22 (46th)
Momentum: 0.41 (161st)
Off. Momentum: 1.08 (132nd)
Def. Momentum: -0.67 (188th)
Consistency: -10.79 (330th)
Res. Consistency: -15.92 (343rd)
Away From Home: -2.39 (348th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.06 (99th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.11 21.77 73.58 81.34 42.02 27.89 34.88 27.89 36.42 25.56 55.92 8.46 10.93 4.68 34.28 34.29 31.43 2.03
RANK: 297th 293rd 121st 307th 244th 265th 93rd 75th 237th 310th 261st 305th 309th 205th 237th 49th 286th 199th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 113.93 30.18 -- 84.98 47.25 29.62 38.02 22.11 36.74 33.25 62.46 11.92 14.71 6.09 34.86 26.02 39.12 1.96
RANK: 355th 336th -- 207th 334th 133rd 350th 74th 133rd 330th 296th 270th 279th 301st 118th 68th 333rd 307th

ANALYSIS:
Omaha presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. They have a record of 5-25 and are ranked 343rd overall (out of 358) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 10) in the Summit League (average ranking 229.5).

Omaha has a very sieve-like defense that gives up points way too easily. The team is ranked fourth from the bottom in efficiency on that end of the court and gives up more than 113 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Omaha does an extremely poor job to deny the opposition behind the arc. They rank ninth from the bottom nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 38.0% of their attempts from afar. Omaha also fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 30.18 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #336 in the country in that category. Omaha is lastly one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #334 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 47.2% of their total attempts from the floor.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, Omaha still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 94 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #297 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Omaha does a fairly poor job cleaning the offensive glass. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 10.93 in potential points scored off of second chances (309th nationally).

Omaha has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 330th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most. On the road, Omaha performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked 348th in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Omaha usually performs better than average. Omaha is more efficient than normal 68% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.20. In all other contests, Omaha performs better than average 20% of the time.
Omaha is typically better vs. teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. Against foes that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.03%, Omaha performs above their norm 68% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 20% of the time.
When facing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, Omaha often performs worse than normal. Omaha is more efficient than usual 22% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.64%. In their other contests, Omaha performs better than the norm 65% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Kamateros scores 20 to lead South Dakota past Omaha 91-69
(2/10/2022 11:30:23 PM) OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Tasos Kamateros had 20 points as South Dakota rolled past Omaha 91-69 on Thursday night.
Abmas scores 28 to carry Oral Roberts past Omaha 100-88
(1/27/2022 11:04:47 PM) OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Max Abmas had 28 points as Oral Roberts topped Omaha 100-88 on Thursday night.
Massner, W. Illinois visit Nebraska Omaha
(12/21/2021 6:34:19 AM) Western Illinois (10-2, 1-0) vs. Nebraska Omaha (1-11, 0-1)
Bergersen scores 32 to carry E. Washington over Omaha 92-81
(12/4/2021 3:58:44 PM) OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Rylan Bergersen had a career-high 32 points as Eastern Washington beat Nebraska Omaha 92-81 on Saturday.
Bannan scores 24 to lead Montana past Omaha 68-47
(11/21/2021 12:53:25 AM) MISSOULA, Mont. (AP) — Josh Bannan had a career-high 24 points plus 12 rebounds as Montana easily beat Omaha 68-47 on Saturday night.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25140th140th93rd135thSummit League158th84th196th207th123rd199th
2023-24249th249th241st297thSummit League176th326th283rd161st250th259th
2022-23314th314th335th326thSummit League125th126th230th258th178th305th
2021-22343rd343rd348th343rdSummit League46th330th200th99th348th341st
2020-21295th295th329th314thSummit League63rd145th133rd210th144th298th
2019-20224th224th192nd182ndSummit League121st220th147th266th313th201st
2018-19161st161st73rd130thSummit League212th201st259th111th219th163rd
2017-18273rd273rd315th292ndSummit League75th55th122nd171st109th247th
2016-17176th174th134th139thSummit League10th135th130th204th48th186th
2015-16131st131st144th157thSummit League5th74th165th132nd52nd118th
2014-15248th248th246th269thSummit League2nd31st272nd99th209th235th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2591st96th155th109th139th147th131st163rd141st199th137th283rd205th303rd169th175th222nd214th
2023-24232nd48th81st276th261st261st332nd53rd149th331st142nd244th293rd228th246th42nd319th239th
2022-23289th180th14th320th270th332nd229th89th315th199th230th334th271st229th317th57th160th72nd
2021-22297th293rd121st307th244th265th93rd75th237th310th261st305th309th205th237th49th286th199th
2020-21274th309th225th96th263rd328th165th50th285th82nd282nd208th239th282nd335th53rd113th34th
2019-20196th319th190th49th155th285th160th33rd48th175th243rd211th204th149th306th43rd215th99th
2018-1977th319th192nd21st67th179th29th54th6th157th241st310th95th47th233rd76th216th162nd
2017-18205th289th178th221st136th201st128th162nd177th168th149th237th235th169th181st155th155th150th
2016-17127th76th33rd281st164th196th91st268th197th111th252nd5th109th171st167th258th80th136th
2015-1684th89th30th215th52nd299th221st161st211th48th42nd2nd88th84th296th156th36th30th
2014-15213th76th100th292nd199th254th274th186th94th163rd221st29th122nd243rd229th158th115th112th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25225th252nd--100th218th308th234th161st293rd44th267th83rd33rd28th320th187th49th41st
2023-24267th204th--148th281st266th269th206th346th86th239th147th65th161st275th213th91st75th
2022-23331st245th--280th246th292nd303rd20th118th336th178th305th104th149th263rd12th320th226th
2021-22355th336th--207th334th133rd350th74th133rd330th296th270th279th301st118th68th333rd307th
2020-21302nd173rd--214th291st150th327th105th165th303rd243rd193rd113th238th120th87th301st279th
2019-20290th96th--300th234th302nd274th62nd80th289th220th176th85th172nd261st27th258th176th
2018-19287th60th--310th232nd325th203rd137th246th168th270th81st120th193rd298th99th123rd82nd
2017-18322nd70th--324th303rd203rd275th230th328th273rd249th265th262nd322nd125th188th225th230th
2016-17246th121st--203rd253rd230th173rd141st310th187th252nd228th347th316th228th131st173rd154th
2015-16266th225th--71st297th81st165th202nd332nd156th290th59th231st251st113th239th182nd212th
2014-15288th215th--70th325th109th293rd156th264th138th338th321st132nd257th141st207th180th195th