TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Omaha  18-14 (0.563)  |  Summit League
All-Play Percentage: 0.629 (131st)
Schedule Strength: 0.511 (165th)
Record Quality: 0.033 (157th)
Avg. Season Rank: 122.84 (118th)
Pace: 76.70 (5th)
Momentum: -2.99 (304th)
Off. Momentum: 1.64 (107th)
Def. Momentum: -4.63 (341st)
Consistency: -8.09 (74th)
Res. Consistency: -8.91 (21st)
Away From Home: 1.46 (52nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.39 (132nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.85 30.74 75.14 81.24 46.37 24.70 34.03 24.39 34.90 32.15 64.56 17.14 16.60 7.67 30.41 30.02 39.57 1.91
RANK: 84th 89th 30th 215th 52nd 299th 221st 161st 211th 48th 42nd 2nd 88th 84th 296th 156th 36th 30th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.29 30.15 -- 79.49 46.88 26.85 34.74 24.49 40.90 28.15 63.68 9.39 15.93 7.70 33.78 30.81 35.41 1.98
RANK: 266th 225th -- 71st 297th 81st 165th 202nd 332nd 156th 290th 59th 231st 251st 113th 239th 182nd 212th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Omaha should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. They have a record of 18-14 and are ranked 131st overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #2 team (out of nine) in the Summit League (average ranking 169.2).

While favoring one of the game's most blistering paces (the fifth-fastest in D1), the primary strength for Omaha this year is offense. The team is ranked 84th in efficiency on that end of the floor, and they'll rack up more than 106 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Omaha does a really good job converting from the free throw line. Making 75.1% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 30th nationally in free throw percentage. Moreover, they get ample opportunity to beat you from the line, as the ball-club falls in the top-100 in free throw attempt rate with a rating of 30.74 vs. AO. Omaha will also make a strong effort to get off as many field goals close to the basket as they can. The ball-club is 36th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to get to the inside, they are undoubtedly capable of making you pay. Presently rated in the top-50 in near-proximity shooting percentage, they make roughly 64.6% of their attempts from short-distance vs. AO.

Unfortunately, Omaha is not even remotely close to being as good on defense as they are on offense. The team is ranked 266th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 107 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Omaha performs really badly when attempting to stop opponents from making mid-range jumpers. The squad is ranked 332nd nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 40.9% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. If Omaha does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their willingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of steals. The team has a solid rating of 17.14 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks second-best in college basketball.

Omaha has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 304th in the country in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Omaha usually performs worse than average. Omaha is more efficient than normal 26% of the time when facing clubs that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 70.32%. In all other contests, Omaha performs better than average 73% of the time.
Omaha is typically worse vs. teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. Against foes that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 80.54, Omaha performs above their norm 33% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 67% of the time.
When facing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Omaha often performs better than normal. Omaha is more efficient than usual 67% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 105.25. In their other contests, Omaha performs better than the norm 33% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25140th140th93rd135thSummit League158th84th196th207th123rd199th
2023-24249th249th241st297thSummit League176th326th283rd161st250th259th
2022-23314th314th335th326thSummit League125th126th230th258th178th305th
2021-22343rd343rd348th343rdSummit League46th330th200th99th348th341st
2020-21295th295th329th314thSummit League63rd145th133rd210th144th298th
2019-20224th224th192nd182ndSummit League121st220th147th266th313th201st
2018-19161st161st73rd130thSummit League212th201st259th111th219th163rd
2017-18273rd273rd315th292ndSummit League75th55th122nd171st109th247th
2016-17176th174th134th139thSummit League10th135th130th204th48th186th
2015-16131st131st144th157thSummit League5th74th165th132nd52nd118th
2014-15248th248th246th269thSummit League2nd31st272nd99th209th235th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2591st96th155th109th139th147th131st163rd141st199th137th283rd205th303rd169th175th222nd214th
2023-24232nd48th81st276th261st261st332nd53rd149th331st142nd244th293rd228th246th42nd319th239th
2022-23289th180th14th320th270th332nd229th89th315th199th230th334th271st229th317th57th160th72nd
2021-22297th293rd121st307th244th265th93rd75th237th310th261st305th309th205th237th49th286th199th
2020-21274th309th225th96th263rd328th165th50th285th82nd282nd208th239th282nd335th53rd113th34th
2019-20196th319th190th49th155th285th160th33rd48th175th243rd211th204th149th306th43rd215th99th
2018-1977th319th192nd21st67th179th29th54th6th157th241st310th95th47th233rd76th216th162nd
2017-18205th289th178th221st136th201st128th162nd177th168th149th237th235th169th181st155th155th150th
2016-17127th76th33rd281st164th196th91st268th197th111th252nd5th109th171st167th258th80th136th
2015-1684th89th30th215th52nd299th221st161st211th48th42nd2nd88th84th296th156th36th30th
2014-15213th76th100th292nd199th254th274th186th94th163rd221st29th122nd243rd229th158th115th112th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25225th252nd--100th218th308th234th161st293rd44th267th83rd33rd28th320th187th49th41st
2023-24267th204th--148th281st266th269th206th346th86th239th147th65th161st275th213th91st75th
2022-23331st245th--280th246th292nd303rd20th118th336th178th305th104th149th263rd12th320th226th
2021-22355th336th--207th334th133rd350th74th133rd330th296th270th279th301st118th68th333rd307th
2020-21302nd173rd--214th291st150th327th105th165th303rd243rd193rd113th238th120th87th301st279th
2019-20290th96th--300th234th302nd274th62nd80th289th220th176th85th172nd261st27th258th176th
2018-19287th60th--310th232nd325th203rd137th246th168th270th81st120th193rd298th99th123rd82nd
2017-18322nd70th--324th303rd203rd275th230th328th273rd249th265th262nd322nd125th188th225th230th
2016-17246th121st--203rd253rd230th173rd141st310th187th252nd228th347th316th228th131st173rd154th
2015-16266th225th--71st297th81st165th202nd332nd156th290th59th231st251st113th239th182nd212th
2014-15288th215th--70th325th109th293rd156th264th138th338th321st132nd257th141st207th180th195th