TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 UL Monroe  7-25 (0.219)  |  Sun Belt
All-Play Percentage: 0.044 (348th)
Schedule Strength: 0.363 (271st)
Record Quality: -0.411 (348th)
Avg. Season Rank: 336.96 (345th)
Pace: 67.64 (115th)
Momentum: 0.71 (147th)
Off. Momentum: 3.80 (20th)
Def. Momentum: -3.09 (321st)
Consistency: -9.13 (132nd)
Res. Consistency: -12.73 (194th)
Away From Home: -1.42 (272nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.86 (167th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.54 25.01 71.69 87.57 39.42 28.84 33.18 30.38 30.99 28.35 54.79 13.26 16.29 6.58 32.94 34.69 32.38 2.01
RANK: 341st 268th 209th 160th 349th 322nd 225th 14th 351st 312th 304th 117th 98th 116th 330th 12th 312th 152nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 116.81 23.03 -- 91.10 47.14 40.15 36.08 19.87 38.31 31.08 67.08 13.82 16.18 7.09 44.07 21.81 34.12 2.10
RANK: 331st 39th -- 334th 316th 354th 295th 114th 219th 139th 363rd 296th 293rd 308th 338th 69th 85th 43rd

ANALYSIS:
UL Monroe is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. Ranked 348th overall (out of 364) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 7-25. Of the 14 schools in the Sun Belt (average ranking 222.8), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.

UL Monroe has one of the most anemic offenses around. They rank 341st in efficiency on that end of the court and score fewer than 97 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. UL Monroe is downright rotten when shooting the mid-range jumper. The team is ranked 351st in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 31.0% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO. Exacerbating the situation, they find themselves in the bottom-25 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting only 39.4% of all their attempts from the floor vs. AO.

UL Monroe doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 117 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #331 in the nation in defensive efficiency. UL Monroe fares terribly when attempting to stop opponents from converting from the inside. The team is ranked second from the bottom in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 67.1% of their attempts from close-up. UL Monroe also struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 334th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 91.10 vs. AO. If UL Monroe does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success preventing opponents from getting to the free throw line. The team has a defensive free throw attempt rate of 23.03 vs. AO, which ranks 39th-best in the country.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UL Monroe is typically worse vs. teams that find ways to get to the free throw line. Against foes that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 26.63, UL Monroe performs above their norm 29% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 81% of the time.
When facing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, UL Monroe often performs better than normal. UL Monroe is more efficient than usual 89% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 39.25%. In their other contests, UL Monroe performs better than the norm 43% of the time.
UL Monroe does better vs. clubs that tend to get off more shots. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 88.23, UL Monroe performs above average 82% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 42% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25348th347th339th348thSun Belt115th132nd271st167th272nd345th
2023-24286th284th295th284thSun Belt236th165th189th136th173rd297th
2022-23276th276th295th282ndSun Belt280th97th142nd297th251st290th
2021-22288th287th245th258thSun Belt133rd301st197th278th71st283rd
2020-21289th289th308th329thSun Belt226th78th252nd46th159th315th
2019-20253rd253rd304th279thSun Belt304th91st124th149th311th272nd
2018-19134th132nd148th168thSun Belt248th48th186th134th95th144th
2017-18217th216th182nd215thSun Belt278th324th210th32nd126th233rd
2016-17268th268th319th309thSun Belt315th38th181st269th286th277th
2015-16117th117th124th141stSun Belt282nd346th148th153rd290th132nd
2014-15162nd161st91st139thSun Belt286th24th197th37th140th190th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25341st268th209th160th349th322nd225th14th351st312th304th117th98th116th330th12th312th152nd
2023-24265th71st332nd57th295th336th331st17th270th159th271st144th44th188th348th25th198th52nd
2022-23300th271st210th38th355th119th202nd41st359th318th329th161st158th300th174th51st338th295th
2021-22234th351st213th165th118th256th210th152nd254th76th89th116th318th331st261st161st84th68th
2020-21309th317th272nd146th289th236th291st71st249th228th254th32nd156th284th248th75th233rd166th
2019-20275th238th302nd194th243rd295th138th9th198th332nd179th344th278th273rd291st10th333rd211th
2018-1950th179th12th149th109th66th7th196th216th269th134th202nd132nd104th68th196th279th306th
2017-18247th350th160th30th276th20th214th84th161st339th181st68th322nd344th48th102nd345th342nd
2016-17277th350th299th3rd288th124th287th54th274th196th207th289th176th195th197th83rd270th213th
2015-16106th284th181st31st83rd242nd148th51st136th104th56th302nd112th50th277th70th166th94th
2014-15232nd323rd119th9th260th249th311th33rd234th72nd226th282nd63rd69th295th65th157th82nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25331st39th--334th316th354th295th114th219th139th363rd296th293rd308th338th69th85th43rd
2023-24284th298th--51st251st345th289th64th152nd14th357th146th120th83rd356th96th21st5th
2022-23239th120th--180th199th309th309th233rd243rd38th213th96th183rd183rd304th238th33rd29th
2021-22306th258th--185th277th328th310th84th325th110th252nd336th313th199th327th80th102nd50th
2020-21261st249th--98th202nd335th297th202nd242nd8th279th92nd263rd149th346th217th11th6th
2019-20209th221st--249th126th315th97th226th147th67th278th143rd226th144th302nd214th48th34th
2018-19236th34th--306th222nd291st195th233rd343rd136th173rd132nd310th288th255th199th101st97th
2017-18177th112th--169th177th325th175th152nd200th63rd281st39th96th138th323rd148th60th30th
2016-17210th138th--282nd172nd213th284th180th44th258th185th263rd255th236th159th153rd219th216th
2015-16144th70th--259th111th307th158th178th234th144th86th77th193rd100th283rd158th111th70th
2014-15118th34th--313th82nd315th73rd221st240th116th67th81st210th51st295th178th76th55th