TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2019-20 Charlotte  16-13 (0.552)  |  Conference USA
All-Play Percentage: 0.511 (173rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.484 (181st)
Record Quality: 0.050 (153rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 140.68 (133rd)
Pace: 67.58 (293rd)
Momentum: -3.33 (314th)
Off. Momentum: -2.47 (327th)
Def. Momentum: -0.87 (187th)
Consistency: -10.80 (339th)
Res. Consistency: -12.47 (217th)
Away From Home: -1.94 (303rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.37 (80th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through March 11, 2020. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 94.99 25.93 69.70 76.19 44.28 27.61 34.25 18.95 33.19 29.62 60.71 12.67 9.63 3.91 36.24 24.88 38.88 1.97
RANK: 243rd 150th 223rd 345th 121st 270th 117th 284th 317th 122nd 124th 81st 327th 279th 219th 249th 58th 80th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.18 22.90 -- 79.72 43.77 31.13 31.62 18.35 39.28 30.24 59.01 11.65 12.29 5.61 39.05 23.02 37.94 2.01
RANK: 89th 80th -- 87th 189th 200th 85th 27th 256th 259th 170th 220th 126th 254th 233rd 25th 290th 212th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Charlotte, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. They have a record of 16-13 and are ranked 173rd overall (out of 353) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #7 team (out of 14) in Conference USA (average ranking 174.7).

Charlotte has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #89 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 95 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Charlotte makes a point to avoid fouls and prevent opponents from getting to the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 22.90 vs. AO, they are currently rated 80th in the country in that category.

Unfortunately, Charlotte is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 243rd in offensive efficiency, scoring about 95 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Charlotte happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked ninth from the bottom in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 76.19 vs. AO. Charlotte also does a fairly poor job cleaning the offensive glass. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 9.63 in potential points scored off of second chances (327th nationally).

Charlotte has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 314th in the country in positive momentum. Charlotte has also been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 339th overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds, Charlotte usually performs better than average. Charlotte is more efficient than normal 77% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.51. In all other contests, Charlotte performs better than average 13% of the time.
Charlotte is typically worse vs. teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.89%, Charlotte performs above their norm 14% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 67% of the time.
When facing teams that shoot the ball well from the field, Charlotte often performs better than normal. Charlotte is more efficient than usual 64% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.17%. In their other contests, Charlotte performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Big First Half Propels Bulldogs to Home Victory
(3/8/2020 12:19:00 AM) Words spoken by head coach Eric Konkol in the post-game press conference that Louisiana Tech took to heart as they used a big first-half to help produce a dominating 66-43 victory over Charlotte on Saturday night in front of 3,359 fans inside the Thomas Assembly Center. LA Tech (22-8, 13-5 C-USA) played its most complete half of the season ...
Charlotte defeats C-USA champion North Texas 56-43
(3/5/2020 12:15:34 AM) CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — Jordan Shepherd scored 18 points and Charlotte upended Conference USA regular-season champion North Texas 56-43. North Texas clinched its first regular-season conference title in 31 years on Sunday,
49ers clinch bye in CUSA tourney
(3/5/2020 12:07:00 AM) ... Charlotte upended Conference USA regular-season champion North Texas 56-43. Charlotte won a school-record 13th game in Halton Arena this season. Jahmir Young had 10 points for the 49ers, Malik Martin added five steals. The 49ers, picked to finish 12th in Conference USA, will be the four seed, and have a bye in next week's league tournament.
Late night hoops rewind -- Charlotte 56, North Texas 43
(3/4/2020 9:24:00 PM) Where UNT stands: The Mean Green wrapped up their regular season with a 20-11 record and finished 14-4 in Conference USA play after falling to Charlotte. UNT won the conference title with a win over Western Kentucky on Sunday and didn't have a whole lot ...
Antetokounmpo’s 41 points lift Bucks past Hornets 93-85
(3/1/2020 11:00:00 PM) Charlotte became the first team this season to hold Milwaukee under 100 points. Osasumwen Osaghae scored 19 points, grabbed 12 rebounds and blocked four shots to lead Florida International to a 67-52 win over Charlotte.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25268th268th316th267thAAC307th191st150th148th92nd230th
2023-24127th127th108th98thAAC351st191st122nd160th333rd111th
2022-23110th109th108th110thConference USA362nd178th151st206th169th111th
2021-22187th186th161st146thConference USA289th272nd164th302nd330th163rd
2020-21265th265th269th225thConference USA338th327th186th99th248th204th
2019-20173rd173rd147th153rdConference USA293rd339th181st80th303rd133rd
2018-19280th280th325th297thConference USA304th343rd200th79th248th287th
2017-18284th284th336th313thConference USA46th189th133rd138th259th304th
2016-17238th238th245th227thConference USA13th77th188th301st317th226th
2015-16204th204th233rd220thConference USA65th331st203rd287th207th250th
2014-15154th154th224th198thConference USA65th25th134th80th153rd123rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25213th27th86th330th260th154th300th292nd307th180th191st289th326th295th116th284th134th198th
2023-24138th51st55th292nd131st191st300th209th177th199th57th280th231st94th155th195th165th187th
2022-23114th343rd55th225th40th103rd45th297th96th149th67th338th352nd334th90th295th130th225th
2021-22138th225th11th241st103rd177th251st321st341st35th55th285th319th264th167th318th28th87th
2020-21297th144th128th343rd259th268th317th212th199th209th221st165th280th296th212th176th133rd129th
2019-20243rd150th223rd345th121st270th117th284th317th122nd124th81st327th279th219th249th58th80th
2018-19301st153rd41st351st233rd199th289th276th285th290th121st291st345th256th93rd235th199th242nd
2017-18255th93rd109th321st226th292nd198th100th315th268th121st185th237th100th263rd69th218th138th
2016-17210th193rd47th322nd176th232nd131st116th320th303rd66th208th331st331st198th86th269th212th
2015-16174th302nd206th87th189th177th71st118th325th139th140th73rd247th308th200th131st176th153rd
2014-1592nd159th304th158th52nd310th38th77th125th102nd72nd169th73rd34th315th71st101st52nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25296th248th--109th346th109th250th172nd345th219th346th79th96th347th130th191st242nd253rd
2023-24126th174th--261st115th167th28th222nd140th248th200th164th191st146th128th201st214th232nd
2022-23123rd9th--187th200th232nd182nd184th196th174th258th27th45th24th221st182nd162nd147th
2021-22263rd100th--206th274th134th325th69th234th332nd147th96th63rd112th122nd59th336th308th
2020-21221st37th--119th313th200th209th21st268th289th301st195th81st110th236th23rd304th241st
2019-2089th80th--87th189th200th85th27th256th259th170th220th126th254th233rd25th290th212th
2018-19260th181st--121st251st275th314th39th71st164th252nd335th51st184th299th42nd188th121st
2017-18301st183rd--198th306th207th282nd254th119th107th350th342nd222nd234th189th257th102nd120th
2016-17256th185th--210th286th27th243rd322nd77th194th342nd244th315th341st20th324th179th283rd
2015-16252nd43rd--171st323rd64th344th278th267th184th302nd203rd29th204th62nd284th180th246th
2014-15223rd123rd--237th213th208th262nd177th98th215th249th253rd55th228th185th156th190th182nd