TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Charlotte  8-21 (0.276)  |  Conference USA
All-Play Percentage: 0.207 (280th)
Schedule Strength: 0.476 (200th)
Record Quality: -0.252 (297th)
Avg. Season Rank: 280.58 (287th)
Pace: 66.46 (304th)
Momentum: 2.73 (60th)
Off. Momentum: 5.80 (2nd)
Def. Momentum: -3.07 (313th)
Consistency: -11.86 (343rd)
Res. Consistency: -13.70 (260th)
Away From Home: -0.77 (248th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.16 (79th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.16 26.66 75.40 76.23 42.58 31.66 32.04 17.63 33.04 26.93 61.22 9.40 9.57 5.19 41.53 23.13 35.33 2.06
RANK: 301st 153rd 41st 351st 233rd 199th 289th 276th 285th 290th 121st 291st 345th 256th 93rd 235th 199th 242nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.06 26.16 -- 82.41 45.87 34.50 37.59 17.54 33.53 30.37 62.39 14.58 11.84 6.13 41.87 21.28 36.85 2.05
RANK: 260th 181st -- 121st 251st 275th 314th 39th 71st 164th 252nd 335th 51st 184th 299th 42nd 188th 121st

ANALYSIS:
Charlotte presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. Their record this season is 8-21, and the club is ranked 280th overall (out of 353) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #13 team (out of 14) in Conference USA (average ranking 186.6).

Charlotte is not one of the better offensive teams you will find. They are rated #301 in efficiency on that end of the court and only score about 95 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Charlotte happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked third from the bottom in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 76.23 vs. AO. Charlotte also poses no threat whatsoever to grab rebounds off their own misses. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 9.57 in potential points scored off of second chances (ninth from the bottom nationally). Charlotte lastly tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 14.58, which ranks 335th in D1. If Charlotte does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's outstanding shooting at the charity stripe. The squad makes 75.4% of their free throw attempts, which ranks #41 in Division I.

Charlotte doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 108 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #260 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Charlotte does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 314th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 37.6% of their attempts from afar.

Charlotte has been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 343rd overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Charlotte does worse vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.77, Charlotte performs above average 15% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 63% of the time.
Charlotte performs worse against squads that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 84.24, Charlotte is more efficient than normal 11% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 55% of the time.
When playing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Charlotte usually performs better than average. Charlotte is more efficient than normal 70% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.33%. In all other contests, Charlotte performs better than average 26% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Men’s Basketball: Sims and Green lead Blue Raiders to third consecutive victory
(2/9/2019 10:08:00 AM) The Middle Tennessee State Blue Raiders (8-16, 5-6) were able to stay hot and improve their win streak to three with a 71-53 victory over the Charlotte 49ers (5-18, 2-10) in Murphy Center on ...
ODU clips Charlotte for 13th win in last 15 games
(1/21/2019 11:03:00 PM) The Old Dominion men’s basketball team (15-5, 5-2 C-USA) erased a 12-point first half deficit to take down Charlotte (5-13, 2-5 C-USA) by a 76-70 score on Monday afternoon at Halton Arena.
3-pointer with 2 seconds left sends Charlotte 49ers to defeat | Charlotte Observer
(1/17/2019 9:54:00 PM) But Charlotte had one more rally left, and the 49ers closed to 60-58 on a Davis free throw with ... That is an effort by college basketball coaches to stress the importance of reading among elementary school-age students. A local connection on the ...
Making an impact? How 2 walk-ons play key roles for short-handed Charlotte 49ers
(1/9/2019 4:52:00 PM) Injuries to a thin and inexperienced roster have forced Charlotte 49ers basketball coach Ron Sanchez to look far - really far - down his bench for help. As the 49ers … Click to Continue »
Beyers block seals Marshall University victory at Charlotte
(1/9/2019 12:16:00 AM) CHARLOTTE, N.C. - Marshall's Thundering Herd comes home 2-0 in Conference USA men's basketball after opening the league season ... forward Mikel Beyers rejected a shot by Jon Davis of the 49ers in the final second and the Herd held on for an 85-84 victory ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25268th268th316th267thAAC307th191st150th147th92nd230th
2023-24127th127th108th98thAAC351st191st122nd160th333rd111th
2022-23110th109th108th110thConference USA362nd178th151st206th169th111th
2021-22187th186th161st146thConference USA289th272nd164th302nd330th163rd
2020-21265th265th269th225thConference USA338th327th186th99th248th204th
2019-20173rd173rd147th153rdConference USA293rd339th181st80th303rd133rd
2018-19280th280th325th297thConference USA304th343rd200th79th248th287th
2017-18284th284th336th313thConference USA46th189th133rd138th259th304th
2016-17238th238th245th227thConference USA13th77th188th301st317th226th
2015-16204th204th233rd220thConference USA65th331st203rd287th207th250th
2014-15154th154th224th198thConference USA65th25th134th80th153rd123rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25213th27th86th330th260th155th301st292nd307th180th192nd290th325th295th117th284th134th198th
2023-24138th51st55th292nd131st191st300th209th177th199th57th280th231st94th155th195th165th187th
2022-23114th343rd55th225th40th103rd45th297th96th149th67th338th352nd334th90th295th130th225th
2021-22138th225th11th241st103rd177th251st321st341st35th55th285th319th264th167th318th28th87th
2020-21297th144th128th343rd259th268th317th212th199th209th221st165th280th296th212th176th133rd129th
2019-20243rd150th223rd345th121st270th117th284th317th122nd124th81st327th279th219th249th58th80th
2018-19301st153rd41st351st233rd199th289th276th285th290th121st291st345th256th93rd235th199th242nd
2017-18255th93rd109th321st226th292nd198th100th315th268th121st185th237th100th263rd69th218th138th
2016-17210th193rd47th322nd176th232nd131st116th320th303rd66th208th331st331st198th86th269th212th
2015-16174th302nd206th87th189th177th71st118th325th139th140th73rd247th308th200th131st176th153rd
2014-1592nd159th304th158th52nd310th38th77th125th102nd72nd169th73rd34th315th71st101st52nd
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25297th247th--109th346th108th250th172nd345th220th346th78th96th346th131st191st241st251st
2023-24126th174th--261st115th167th28th222nd140th248th200th164th191st146th128th201st214th232nd
2022-23123rd9th--187th200th232nd182nd184th196th174th258th27th45th24th221st182nd162nd147th
2021-22263rd100th--206th274th134th325th69th234th332nd147th96th63rd112th122nd59th336th308th
2020-21221st37th--119th313th200th209th21st268th289th301st195th81st110th236th23rd304th241st
2019-2089th80th--87th189th200th85th27th256th259th170th220th126th254th233rd25th290th212th
2018-19260th181st--121st251st275th314th39th71st164th252nd335th51st184th299th42nd188th121st
2017-18301st183rd--198th306th207th282nd254th119th107th350th342nd222nd234th189th257th102nd120th
2016-17256th185th--210th286th27th243rd322nd77th194th342nd244th315th341st20th324th179th283rd
2015-16252nd43rd--171st323rd64th344th278th267th184th302nd203rd29th204th62nd284th180th246th
2014-15223rd123rd--237th213th208th262nd177th98th215th249th253rd55th228th185th156th190th182nd