TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 UNC Asheville  17-15 (0.531)  |  Big South
All-Play Percentage: 0.417 (209th)
Schedule Strength: 0.326 (282nd)
Record Quality: -0.117 (239th)
Avg. Season Rank: 223.79 (225th)
Pace: 68.18 (160th)
Momentum: 1.09 (125th)
Off. Momentum: 4.32 (8th)
Def. Momentum: -3.24 (319th)
Consistency: -9.44 (208th)
Res. Consistency: -10.93 (109th)
Away From Home: 1.05 (80th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.45 (132nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.32 26.53 72.66 82.77 42.86 29.92 33.69 23.76 39.26 29.10 55.24 9.75 14.08 4.70 36.14 28.70 35.16 2.01
RANK: 189th 102nd 147th 255th 198th 210th 147th 213th 99th 174th 281st 234th 121st 203rd 194th 190th 147th 160th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.96 23.75 -- 85.60 45.86 27.33 30.70 22.47 44.15 35.80 58.51 11.11 16.45 6.45 31.92 26.26 41.82 1.90
RANK: 213th 141st -- 237th 286th 48th 55th 90th 351st 353rd 155th 207th 342nd 321st 32nd 75th 354th 351st

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, UNC Asheville is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. Ranked 209th overall (out of 358) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 17-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of 12) in the Big South (average ranking 245.6).

UNC Asheville does not have a terribly exceptional defense this year. Rated at #213 in defensive efficiency, they allow around 103 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UNC Asheville performs really badly when attempting to stop opponents from making mid-range jumpers. The squad is ranked eighth from the bottom nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 44.1% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. UNC Asheville also gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 16.45 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (342nd nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 6.5% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 321st) as well.

UNC Asheville doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 100 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #189 in the nation in offensive efficiency. UNC Asheville fares worse than most teams when it comes to converting from locations close to the hoop. The team is ranked 281st in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 55.2% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
UNC Asheville ousts Stephen F. Austin 80-68 in CBI
(3/19/2022 4:59:17 PM) DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. (AP) — Drew Pember tossed in 17 points as UNC Asheville knocked off Stephen F. Austin 80-68 in the first round of the College Bask...
Williams lifts Gardner-Webb past UNC Asheville 61-55
(1/27/2022 9:47:24 PM) ASHEVILLE, N.C. (AP) — D’Maurian Williams had 21 points as Gardner-Webb topped UNC Asheville 61-55 on Thursday night.
Whatley’s late heroics help NC A&T past UNC Asheville 73-71
(1/19/2022 9:16:48 PM) ASHEVILLE, N.C. (AP) — Justin Whatley made 1 of 2 foul shots with eight seconds left and North Carolina A&T held of UNC Asheville for a 73-71 win on W...
Jones lifts UNC Asheville over Milligan 114-54
(12/21/2021 9:55:55 PM) ASHEVILLE, N.C. (AP) — Tajion Jones scored 19 points as UNC Asheville easily beat Milligan 114-54 on Tuesday night.
Pember leads UNC Asheville past W. Carolina 73-72
(12/11/2021 5:48:42 PM) CULLOWHEE, N.C. (AP) — Drew Pember recorded 19 points and 13 rebounds to lift UNC Asheville to a 73-72 win over Western Carolina on Saturday.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25207th205th75th152ndBig South124th289th268th212th137th190th
2023-24169th169th78th130thBig South131st92nd208th218th255th161st
2022-23157th157th18th83rdBig South124th100th264th215th229th186th
2021-22209th209th171st239thBig South160th208th282nd132nd80th225th
2020-21250th249th179th212thBig South83rd144th275th139th78th233rd
2019-20317th317th217th282ndBig South40th4th350th106th176th257th
2018-19348th348th350th343rdBig South341st340th179th286th254th350th
2017-18194th194th98th148thBig South88th156th240th79th269th187th
2016-17134th134th54th103rdBig South161st60th286th192nd173rd130th
2015-16129th129th81st138thBig South57th132nd262nd240th61st124th
2014-15247th245th195th246thBig South23rd169th265th166th158th210th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25145th143rd199th101st159th216th210th23rd39th343rd136th176th182nd184th233rd24th345th258th
2023-24161st109th37th327th145th188th80th125th64th333rd183rd275th316th301st137th94th313th287th
2022-23191st57th247th352nd119th288th27th159th184th299th156th219th270th154th241st108th227th174th
2021-22189th102nd147th255th198th210th147th213th99th174th281st234th121st203rd194th190th147th160th
2020-21248th261st352nd344th68th212th79th313th115th104th145th240th333rd176th160th296th52nd109th
2019-20257th160th308th275th207th255th222nd148th85th201st276th50th305th349th235th115th160th131st
2018-19337th348th20th264th330th171st241st168th202nd246th346th245th160th181st149th149th232nd230th
2017-18171st267th62nd284th109th233rd42nd190th221st166th155th62nd226th139th203rd159th131st126th
2016-17122nd201st263rd222nd68th226th60th114th46th229th105th18th271st280th213th105th214th182nd
2015-16195th155th132nd231st160th312th274th96th48th101st233rd6th89th73rd307th84th91st46th
2014-15231st277th53rd260th203rd150th189th230th78th219th242nd292nd118th67th122nd213th185th212th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25275th292nd--169th272nd160th301st228th319th147th192nd102nd250th311th166th230th149th165th
2023-24206th188th--228th200th199th178th93rd132nd305th187th188th77th257th175th71st296th257th
2022-23142nd83rd--285th134th161st84th289th199th192nd177th324th332nd297th119th269th153rd205th
2021-22213th141st--237th286th48th55th90th351st353rd155th207th342nd321st32nd75th354th351st
2020-21272nd192nd--278th292nd13th150th233rd120th348th295th197th357th357th9th204th344th351st
2019-20316th289th--26th353rd14th337th68th353rd311th309th197th284th336th31st111th343rd341st
2018-19349th312th--302nd308th322nd214th29th332nd291st290th344th350th341st300th12th258th155th
2017-18219th260th--128th242nd127th114th20th327th330th123rd85th253rd269th137th20th336th318th
2016-17160th107th--73rd257th206th228th69th146th169th281st50th246th253rd253rd87th210th166th
2015-1683rd114th--76th173rd77th9th87th314th260th150th297th220th199th104th113th285th287th
2014-15249th313th--147th223rd165th150th43rd284th298th140th243rd252nd283rd172nd41st305th267th