Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 Navy15-19 (0.441) | Patriot League
All-Play Percentage: 0.212 (287th)
Schedule Strength: 0.246 (358th)
Record Quality: -0.260 (311th)
Avg. Season Rank: 297.04 (303rd)
Pace: 66.58 (186th)
Momentum: 3.01 (56th)
Off. Momentum: 3.13 (33rd)
Def. Momentum: -0.12 (177th)
Consistency: -10.03 (249th)
Res. Consistency: -13.23 (229th)
Away From Home: 0.41 (97th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.96 (30th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
101.75
66.38
29.28
72.50
86.51
34.73
40.14
33.67
11.06
32.85
22.44
8.17
36.38
30.40
15.50
51.00
10.76
16.29
5.50
38.92
25.94
35.14
2.04
RANK:
271st
196th
94th
176th
210th
333rd
337th
183rd
218th
242nd
161st
174th
217th
236th
335th
357th
266th
99th
230th
173rd
153rd
236th
219th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
112.04
66.79
28.85
--
86.81
40.18
46.29
32.21
11.50
35.70
24.14
9.53
39.47
30.46
19.16
62.89
10.79
13.93
6.84
37.10
27.81
35.09
2.02
RANK:
254th
192nd
250th
--
164th
267th
288th
113th
179th
271st
296th
324th
262nd
118th
198th
317th
79th
134th
285th
116th
301st
117th
174th
ANALYSIS: Navy is not one of the better teams in Division I this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 287th overall (out of 364) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 15-19. Of the 10 schools in the Patriot League (average ranking 285.9), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference. With a strength-of-schedule rating of 0.246 (which ranks seventh from the bottom in the nation), Navy has faced some of the easiest opponents in all of college basketball.
Navy is not one of the most productive teams on offense. Scoring fewer than 102 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are rated at #271 in offensive efficiency. Navy will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked eighth from the bottom in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 51.0% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 40.1% of their total attempts vs. AO.
Navy doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 112 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #254 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Navy has done a pretty poor job this season to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. The team is ranked 317th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 62.9% of their attempts from close-up.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Navy does worse vs. clubs that convert well from the charity stripe. When playing squads that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.71%, Navy performs above average 31% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 71% of the time.
Navy performs better against squads that favor a faster tempo. When facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 65.91, Navy is more efficient than normal 69% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 35% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.