Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Charleston27-8 (0.771) | CAA
All-Play Percentage: 0.706 (107th)
Schedule Strength: 0.421 (186th)
Record Quality: 0.259 (66th)
Avg. Season Rank: 114.08 (112th)
Pace: 69.90 (58th)
Momentum: 1.65 (97th)
Off. Momentum: 1.96 (84th)
Def. Momentum: -0.32 (168th)
Consistency: -9.46 (209th)
Res. Consistency: -11.70 (145th)
Away From Home: 0.66 (101st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.49 (129th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
112.86
69.98
25.07
72.35
90.44
40.29
44.54
39.45
14.15
35.88
19.36
6.32
32.66
31.63
19.81
62.62
11.06
16.36
6.71
43.62
21.40
34.98
2.09
RANK:
59th
54th
237th
165th
16th
63rd
151st
14th
13th
92nd
282nd
333rd
355th
146th
82nd
60th
201st
56th
68th
31st
317th
225th
308th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
106.34
69.81
23.65
--
86.40
39.30
45.48
30.78
10.92
35.48
25.52
8.86
34.71
30.10
19.52
64.84
11.44
12.45
5.44
35.62
29.54
34.84
2.01
RANK:
195th
303rd
76th
--
226th
260th
243rd
151st
195th
241st
280th
186th
20th
146th
280th
356th
180th
100th
172nd
114th
285th
128th
182nd
ANALYSIS: Charleston is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Ranked 107th overall (out of 362) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 27-8. They are also ranked by this site as the #2 team (out of 14) in the CAA (average ranking 215.7).
Charleston has a reasonably potent offensive attack. Occupying the #59 slot in our offensive efficiency rankings, they will score about 113 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Charleston is one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked 16th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 90.44 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 44.5% of them vs. AO. Charleston will also make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 31st in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to shoot from long, they have the ability to punish you for it, too. Ranked in the top-100 in three-point shooting percentage, they make approximately 35.9% of their three-point attempts vs. AO. If Charleston does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to drain mid-range jumpers. The squad makes just 32.7% of their mid-range field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks eighth-worst in the nation.
The defense for Charleston, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 195th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 106 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Charleston fares terribly when attempting to stop opponents from converting from the inside. The team is ranked seventh from the bottom in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 64.8% of their attempts from close-up. If Charleston does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to prevent opponents from draining shot attempts in between the three-point line and the low post. AO will convert just 34.7% of their mid-range field goal attempts, and the team is nationally ranked 20th-best in that category as a result.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Charleston does worse vs. clubs that allow more chances at the line. When playing squads that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 24.70, Charleston performs above average 30% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 79% of the time.
Charleston performs better against squads that convert well from outside the arc. When facing teams that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 32.77%, Charleston is more efficient than normal 67% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 23% of the time.
When playing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Charleston usually performs worse than average. Charleston is more efficient than normal 20% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 60.41%. In all other contests, Charleston performs better than average 63% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.