Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Charleston31-4 (0.886) | Colonial
All-Play Percentage: 0.785 (79th)
Schedule Strength: 0.352 (275th)
Record Quality: 0.341 (30th)
Avg. Season Rank: 90.45 (90th)
Pace: 71.29 (27th)
Momentum: 1.55 (100th)
Off. Momentum: -1.21 (293rd)
Def. Momentum: 2.77 (18th)
Consistency: -6.45 (3rd)
Res. Consistency: -8.93 (18th)
Away From Home: -1.34 (274th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.56 (248th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
107.19
71.30
28.74
74.46
87.15
36.67
42.08
39.07
12.45
31.88
17.35
6.19
35.69
30.74
18.03
58.65
13.30
16.66
4.76
44.82
19.91
35.27
2.10
RANK:
98th
24th
44th
81st
68th
187th
271st
8th
44th
293rd
342nd
349th
282nd
120th
140th
183rd
50th
50th
244th
13th
347th
171st
322nd
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
95.87
71.29
20.37
--
84.59
36.94
43.67
26.27
8.12
30.90
28.94
10.56
36.48
29.37
18.26
62.16
8.36
12.39
5.05
31.06
34.22
34.73
1.96
RANK:
51st
338th
19th
--
168th
164th
152nd
15th
9th
38th
341st
316th
115th
175th
242nd
291st
20th
59th
146th
16th
345th
169th
291st
ANALYSIS: Despite having one of the better win percentages in Division I, Charleston doesn't quite make it into our list of college basketball's best 25 teams. Carrying a record of 31-4, they are currently rated #79 overall (out of 363) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 13 schools in the Colonial (average ranking 250.7), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.
Charleston will mainly try to find success through their defense. They are ranked 51st in defensive efficiency and allow fewer than 96 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Charleston is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 20.37 vs. AO, they are currently rated 19th in the country in that category. Charleston has also done a very good job to prevent opponents from draining threes this year. They rank 38th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 30.9% of their attempts from afar. For this reason, AO takes nowhere near as many threes as they typically would -- just 31.1% of AO's field goal attempts will be from downtown.
Charleston plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 98th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 107 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Charleston lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks 13th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. Strangely enough, though they shoot a fair amount of threes, they really don't make a whole lot, converting only about 31.9% of their attempts from behind the arc vs. AO. Charleston also allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.36, which ranks #20 in the country.
Charleston is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked third in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, Charleston often performs worse than normal. Charleston is more efficient than usual 25% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.40%. In their other contests, Charleston performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
Charleston does worse vs. clubs that shoot the ball well from the field. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 40.92%, Charleston performs above average 29% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 70% of the time.
Charleston performs worse against squads that effectively clean the offensive glass. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.65, Charleston is more efficient than normal 29% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 70% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.