Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 URI9-22 (0.290) | Atlantic 10
All-Play Percentage: 0.323 (245th)
Schedule Strength: 0.484 (141st)
Record Quality: -0.189 (275th)
Avg. Season Rank: 222.07 (221st)
Pace: 68.55 (135th)
Momentum: -3.14 (305th)
Off. Momentum: -0.36 (232nd)
Def. Momentum: -2.79 (306th)
Consistency: -7.90 (27th)
Res. Consistency: -8.19 (7th)
Away From Home: -0.01 (109th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.84 (46th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
95.85
68.49
28.27
74.52
82.55
32.99
39.96
27.39
8.80
32.14
24.84
8.14
32.78
30.32
16.04
52.91
10.70
15.39
4.50
33.18
30.09
36.73
1.96
RANK:
304th
137th
64th
79th
270th
348th
340th
301st
316th
279th
152nd
257th
349th
135th
253rd
335th
177th
105th
268th
294th
130th
107th
82nd
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
101.94
68.60
25.60
--
85.90
37.28
43.40
30.13
9.57
31.76
22.14
8.37
37.82
33.63
19.34
57.51
11.70
16.06
6.87
35.07
25.78
39.15
1.96
RANK:
147th
235th
199th
--
234th
187th
143rd
141st
86th
61st
108th
111th
179th
335th
301st
122nd
256th
314th
338th
114th
85th
328th
299th
ANALYSIS: They're far from the worst of the worst, but URI should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. They are ranked #245 (out of 363) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 9-22. Of the 15 schools in the A-10 (average ranking 156.7), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.
If there is a strength for URI this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 147th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. URI owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 61st in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.8% of their attempts from afar. If URI does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's issues trying to stop opponents from obtaining and converting second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a defensive second-chance conversion percentage of 6.9% vs. AO, which ranks 26th-worst in the nation.
Unfortunately, URI is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 304th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 96 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. URI struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They are worse off shooting inside the three-point stripe, making good on just 32.8% of their mid-range jumpers (349th in the nation), 52.9% of their near-proximity chances (335th), and 40.0% of their total shots from the field (340th) vs. AO.
URI is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 27th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
URI performs worse against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.32%, URI is more efficient than normal 41% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 100% of the time.
When playing teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds, URI usually performs better than average. URI is more efficient than normal 76% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.92. In all other contests, URI performs better than average 20% of the time.
URI is typically better vs. teams that shoot the ball well from the field. Against foes that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.57%, URI performs above their norm 91% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 40% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.