TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 URI  9-22 (0.290)  |  Atlantic 10
All-Play Percentage: 0.323 (245th)
Schedule Strength: 0.484 (141st)
Record Quality: -0.189 (275th)
Avg. Season Rank: 222.07 (221st)
Pace: 68.55 (135th)
Momentum: -3.14 (305th)
Off. Momentum: -0.36 (232nd)
Def. Momentum: -2.79 (306th)
Consistency: -7.90 (27th)
Res. Consistency: -8.19 (7th)
Away From Home: -0.01 (109th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.84 (46th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.85 28.27 74.52 82.55 39.96 27.39 32.14 24.84 32.78 30.32 52.91 10.70 15.39 4.50 33.18 30.09 36.73 1.96
RANK: 304th 64th 79th 270th 340th 301st 279th 152nd 349th 135th 335th 177th 105th 268th 294th 130th 107th 82nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.94 25.60 -- 85.90 43.40 30.13 31.76 22.14 37.82 33.63 57.51 11.70 16.06 6.87 35.07 25.78 39.15 1.96
RANK: 147th 199th -- 234th 143rd 141st 61st 108th 179th 335th 122nd 256th 314th 338th 114th 85th 328th 299th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but URI should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. They are ranked #245 (out of 363) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 9-22. Of the 15 schools in the A-10 (average ranking 156.7), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.

If there is a strength for URI this year, it's probably on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 147th in defensive efficiency, allowing fewer than 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. URI owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 61st in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.8% of their attempts from afar. If URI does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's issues trying to stop opponents from obtaining and converting second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a defensive second-chance conversion percentage of 6.9% vs. AO, which ranks 26th-worst in the nation.

Unfortunately, URI is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 304th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 96 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. URI struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They are worse off shooting inside the three-point stripe, making good on just 32.8% of their mid-range jumpers (349th in the nation), 52.9% of their near-proximity chances (335th), and 40.0% of their total shots from the field (340th) vs. AO.

URI is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 27th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
URI performs worse against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.32%, URI is more efficient than normal 41% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 100% of the time.
When playing teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds, URI usually performs better than average. URI is more efficient than normal 76% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.92. In all other contests, URI performs better than average 20% of the time.
URI is typically better vs. teams that shoot the ball well from the field. Against foes that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 44.57%, URI performs above their norm 91% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 40% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25159th159th133rd142ndA-1034th182nd155th146th358th116th
2023-24250th250th289th221stA-1091st305th101st252nd320th222nd
2022-23245th245th327th275thA-10135th27th141st46th109th221st
2021-22148th147th201st185thA-10110th4th129th42nd247th114th
2020-21118th118th247th153rdA-10111th61st81st12th175th97th
2019-2078th78th48th55thA-1053rd102nd87th211th22nd60th
2018-19124th123rd141st123rdA-10223rd293rd116th317th236th114th
2017-1860th60th24th25thA-10163rd171st86th255th253rd45th
2016-1737th37th46th37thA-10275th302nd73rd119th4th46th
2015-1678th78th165th123rdA-10312th119th101st261st326th79th
2014-1569th69th48th54thA-1098th6th103rd272nd142nd63rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25149th37th259th352nd85th222nd138th347th202nd41st142nd228th209th107th153rd340th9th68th
2023-24199th39th351st336th101st263rd120th352nd337th10th187th335th200th88th231st351st1st18th
2022-23304th64th79th270th340th301st279th152nd349th135th335th177th105th268th294th130th107th82nd
2021-22260th20th357th342nd115th344th223rd189th350th64th60th105th78th82nd332nd140th31st15th
2020-21144th16th344th244th79th307th257th234th124th32nd123rd134th25th21st293rd224th22nd26th
2019-20129th40th272nd34th210th284th229th114th333rd20th210th13th7th56th309th152nd45th25th
2018-19148th105th238th77th145th282nd342nd109th61st57th137th34th30th29th309th131st76th52nd
2017-1881st116th262nd13th123rd230th149th128th253rd27th146th46th26th75th283rd167th51st52nd
2016-1748th29th289th35th65th206th223rd106th68th68th58th94th78th50th243rd133rd121st107th
2015-16111th135th312th137th85th203rd64th89th220th219th49th105th105th90th217th87th229th166th
2014-15167th6th296th321st100th323rd295th234th217th52nd78th69th53rd27th304th194th19th18th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25193rd118th--238th192nd229th151st37th264th334th112th333rd204th211th204th30th321st263rd
2023-24268th207th--319th231st261st224th16th72nd355th189th288th248th259th201st7th350th313th
2022-23147th199th--234th143rd141st61st108th179th335th122nd256th314th338th114th85th328th299th
2021-2276th247th--80th37th245th149th33rd86th197th12th333rd187th56th266th40th232nd148th
2020-21110th268th--190th56th151st159th179th59th218th35th176th309th139th138th185th218th221st
2019-2044th82nd--126th91st75th14th119th65th293rd129th42nd178th233rd71st140th318th309th
2018-19122nd260th--52nd138th31st216th130th79th247th83rd134th215th270th55th167th297th308th
2017-1849th267th--9th152nd2nd78th106th108th293rd91st147th207th281st5th192nd337th346th
2016-1732nd336th--86th24th4th7th211th47th302nd11th6th335th225th5th246th329th345th
2015-1661st229th--45th112th6th113th299th83rd174th121st84th106th101st9th324th225th314th
2014-1514th304th--21st56th6th2nd199th36th247th97th190th165th127th10th271st308th331st