TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 URI  18-13 (0.581)  |  Atlantic 10
All-Play Percentage: 0.565 (159th)
Schedule Strength: 0.461 (155th)
Record Quality: 0.070 (143rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 124.04 (118th)
Pace: 69.41 (34th)
Momentum: -3.38 (316th)
Off. Momentum: 1.23 (120th)
Def. Momentum: -4.61 (353rd)
Consistency: -9.45 (182nd)
Res. Consistency: -10.45 (52nd)
Away From Home: -3.48 (358th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.64 (145th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.31 32.05 70.00 82.28 45.94 32.55 34.67 13.69 36.71 36.03 59.62 11.36 13.95 6.68 39.56 16.64 43.80 1.96
RANK: 149th 35th 259th 352nd 86th 217th 141st 347th 206th 41st 144th 228th 209th 105th 154th 341st 9th 67th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.06 25.89 -- 88.34 44.44 34.49 33.76 18.04 39.49 35.81 57.23 14.67 14.93 6.22 39.04 20.42 40.54 1.98
RANK: 193rd 117th -- 235th 193rd 229th 152nd 37th 267th 334th 113th 333rd 205th 211th 204th 30th 322nd 264th

ANALYSIS:
Per this website's calculations, URI is somewhere between an average to slightly above-average D1 ball-club. Their record this season is 18-13, and the club is ranked 159th overall (out of 364) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 15) in the A-10 (average ranking 141.1).

Based on the data, URI will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 109 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #149 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. URI will routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is ninth in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 59.6% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. URI also does a really good job to acquire opportunities from the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 32.05 vs. AO, they are ranked 35th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 70.0%. If URI does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties in getting off a sufficient number of shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of just 82.28 vs. AO, which ranks 13th-worst in college basketball.

URI is not quite as good on the defensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 193rd in defensive efficiency, allowing about 109 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. URI hasn't done terribly well defending the mid-range jumper. The squad is ranked 267th nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 39.5% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Thankfully, AO will take nowhere near as many mid-range shots vs. URI as they typically would, as only 20.4% of their field goal attempts will come from in-between locations.

URI has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 316th in the country in positive momentum. On the road, URI performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked seventh from the bottom in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
URI performs worse against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 12.46, URI is more efficient than normal 17% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 56% of the time.
When playing teams that do not defend well on the perimeter, URI usually performs worse than average. URI is more efficient than normal 29% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.57%. In all other contests, URI performs better than average 67% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25159th159th134th143rdA-1034th182nd155th145th358th118th
2023-24250th250th289th221stA-1091st305th101st252nd320th222nd
2022-23245th245th327th275thA-10135th27th141st46th109th221st
2021-22148th147th201st185thA-10110th4th129th42nd247th114th
2020-21118th118th247th153rdA-10111th61st81st12th175th97th
2019-2078th78th48th55thA-1053rd102nd87th211th22nd60th
2018-19124th123rd141st123rdA-10223rd293rd116th317th236th114th
2017-1860th60th24th25thA-10163rd171st86th255th253rd45th
2016-1737th37th46th37thA-10275th302nd73rd119th4th46th
2015-1678th78th165th123rdA-10312th119th101st261st326th79th
2014-1569th69th48th54thA-1098th6th103rd272nd142nd63rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25149th35th259th352nd86th217th141st347th206th41st144th228th209th105th154th341st9th67th
2023-24199th39th351st336th101st263rd120th352nd337th10th187th335th200th88th231st351st1st18th
2022-23304th64th79th270th340th301st279th152nd349th135th335th177th105th268th294th130th107th82nd
2021-22260th20th357th342nd115th344th223rd189th350th64th60th105th78th82nd332nd140th31st15th
2020-21144th16th344th244th79th307th257th234th124th32nd123rd134th25th21st293rd224th22nd26th
2019-20129th40th272nd34th210th284th229th114th333rd20th210th13th7th56th309th152nd45th25th
2018-19148th105th238th77th145th282nd342nd109th61st57th137th34th30th29th309th131st76th52nd
2017-1881st116th262nd13th123rd230th149th128th253rd27th146th46th26th75th283rd167th51st52nd
2016-1748th29th289th35th65th206th223rd106th68th68th58th94th78th50th243rd133rd121st107th
2015-16111th135th312th137th85th203rd64th89th220th219th49th105th105th90th217th87th229th166th
2014-15167th6th296th321st100th323rd295th234th217th52nd78th69th53rd27th304th194th19th18th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25193rd117th--235th193rd229th152nd37th267th334th113th333rd205th211th204th30th322nd264th
2023-24268th207th--319th231st261st224th16th72nd355th189th288th248th259th201st7th350th313th
2022-23147th199th--234th143rd141st61st108th179th335th122nd256th314th338th114th85th328th299th
2021-2276th247th--80th37th245th149th33rd86th197th12th333rd187th56th266th40th232nd148th
2020-21110th268th--190th56th151st159th179th59th218th35th176th309th139th138th185th218th221st
2019-2044th82nd--126th91st75th14th119th65th293rd129th42nd178th233rd71st140th318th309th
2018-19122nd260th--52nd138th31st216th130th79th247th83rd134th215th270th55th167th297th308th
2017-1849th267th--9th152nd2nd78th106th108th293rd91st147th207th281st5th192nd337th346th
2016-1732nd336th--86th24th4th7th211th47th302nd11th6th335th225th5th246th329th345th
2015-1661st229th--45th112th6th113th299th83rd174th121st84th106th101st9th324th225th314th
2014-1514th304th--21st56th6th2nd199th36th247th97th190th165th127th10th271st308th331st