Automated Team Capsule for 2024-25 URI18-13 (0.581) | Atlantic 10
All-Play Percentage: 0.565 (159th)
Schedule Strength: 0.461 (155th)
Record Quality: 0.070 (143rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 124.04 (118th)
Pace: 69.41 (34th)
Momentum: -3.38 (316th)
Off. Momentum: 1.23 (120th)
Def. Momentum: -4.61 (353rd)
Consistency: -9.45 (182nd)
Res. Consistency: -10.45 (52nd)
Away From Home: -3.48 (358th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.64 (145th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 7, 2025. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
109.31
69.11
32.05
70.00
82.28
37.80
45.94
32.55
11.28
34.67
13.69
5.03
36.71
36.03
21.48
59.62
11.36
13.95
6.68
39.56
16.64
43.80
1.96
RANK:
149th
42nd
35th
259th
352nd
199th
86th
217th
196th
141st
347th
344th
206th
41st
53rd
144th
228th
209th
105th
154th
341st
9th
67th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
109.06
69.71
25.89
--
88.34
39.26
44.44
34.49
11.64
33.76
18.04
7.12
39.49
35.81
20.50
57.23
14.67
14.93
6.22
39.04
20.42
40.54
1.98
RANK:
193rd
339th
117th
--
235th
224th
193rd
229th
204th
152nd
37th
82nd
267th
334th
280th
113th
333rd
205th
211th
204th
30th
322nd
264th
ANALYSIS: Per this website's calculations, URI is somewhere between an average to slightly above-average D1 ball-club. Their record this season is 18-13, and the club is ranked 159th overall (out of 364) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 15) in the A-10 (average ranking 141.1).
Based on the data, URI will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 109 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #149 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. URI will routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is ninth in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 59.6% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. URI also does a really good job to acquire opportunities from the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 32.05 vs. AO, they are ranked 35th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 70.0%. If URI does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties in getting off a sufficient number of shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of just 82.28 vs. AO, which ranks 13th-worst in college basketball.
URI is not quite as good on the defensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 193rd in defensive efficiency, allowing about 109 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. URI hasn't done terribly well defending the mid-range jumper. The squad is ranked 267th nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 39.5% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Thankfully, AO will take nowhere near as many mid-range shots vs. URI as they typically would, as only 20.4% of their field goal attempts will come from in-between locations.
URI has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 316th in the country in positive momentum. On the road, URI performs noticeably worse than they do at home. The team is currently ranked seventh from the bottom in the country in the away-from-home metric we track.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
URI performs worse against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 12.46, URI is more efficient than normal 17% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 56% of the time.
When playing teams that do not defend well on the perimeter, URI usually performs worse than average. URI is more efficient than normal 29% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.57%. In all other contests, URI performs better than average 67% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.