TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Marist  7-23 (0.233)  |  MAAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.091 (319th)
Schedule Strength: 0.396 (266th)
Record Quality: -0.368 (327th)
Avg. Season Rank: 315.45 (318th)
Pace: 69.41 (194th)
Momentum: 1.24 (113th)
Off. Momentum: 2.89 (46th)
Def. Momentum: -1.65 (250th)
Consistency: -9.01 (185th)
Res. Consistency: -16.09 (351st)
Away From Home: 1.63 (44th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.80 (176th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 97.68 26.18 72.05 81.44 41.29 34.23 33.75 20.04 33.89 27.17 56.27 8.09 12.62 4.81 42.03 24.61 33.36 2.09
RANK: 228th 255th 98th 203rd 271st 41st 234th 298th 247th 259th 254th 317th 284th 322nd 30th 296th 243rd 316th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 115.30 29.62 -- 84.92 48.71 28.24 40.04 23.44 39.48 33.24 62.60 12.63 16.14 7.94 33.25 27.60 39.14 1.94
RANK: 347th 201st -- 292nd 340th 141st 345th 153rd 310th 311th 265th 301st 243rd 263rd 92nd 120th 290th 295th

ANALYSIS:
Marist presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. Their record this season is 7-23, and the club is ranked 319th overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 11) in the MAAC (average ranking 215.8).

Defense is the farthest thing from a strength for Marist this year. The team ranks fifth from the bottom in defensive efficiency, allowing more than 115 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Marist allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. They are at their worst when defending outside the paint, allowing AO to convert 40.0% of their three-pointers (seventh from the bottom in the nation), 39.5% of their mid-range chances (310th), and 48.7% of their total shots from the field (340th). Marist also does a pretty inadequate job to provide chances for themselves to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #317 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 8.09 vs. AO.

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in offensive efficiency, Marist isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Scoring roughly 98 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #228 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Marist is one of the more deficient teams in the nation as it pertains to scoring off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 4.8% of all second-chance opportunities (322nd nationally). Marist also isn't the greatest at protecting the ball on offense and, as a result, opponents tend to score more quick points off of steals than they normally would. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 12.63, which ranks 301st in D1.

On the road, Marist performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 44th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Marist often performs worse than normal. Marist is more efficient than usual 30% of the time when facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 72.21%. In their other contests, Marist performs better than the norm 70% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25296th296th65th183rdMAAC325th222nd363rd40th16th266th
2023-24245th245th138th207thMAAC319th252nd349th238th166th232nd
2022-23267th267th270th307thMAAC277th295th325th189th10th320th
2021-22226th226th214th232ndMAAC230th266th252nd139th244th222nd
2020-21277th277th130th236thMAAC237th220th338th169th214th300th
2019-20303rd303rd333rd344thMAAC337th168th341st82nd197th329th
2018-19291st291st265th302ndMAAC326th137th329th187th27th255th
2017-18311th311th339th331stMAAC141st345th253rd128th99th307th
2016-17303rd301st326th307thMAAC239th105th198th198th221st299th
2015-16319th319th330th327thMAAC194th185th266th176th44th318th
2014-15292nd292nd340th313thMAAC132nd159th209th42nd76th311th
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25337th361st223rd93rd321st176th351st34th226th334th163rd316th169th255th195th35th341st277th
2023-24320th268th289th334th282nd204th150th193rd302nd268th292nd292nd356th362nd140th164th220th217th
2022-23295th303rd230th162nd327th36th216th138th254th357th270th359th262nd328th36th138th358th354th
2021-22258th341st213th105th250th109th184th147th128th242nd275th219th290th245th125th168th257th258th
2020-21313th320th284th291st266th71st319th184th48th343rd193rd263rd331st317th45th152nd341st335th
2019-20341st276th321st266th337th117th146th150th328th320th328th124th293rd341st90th125th304th294th
2018-19253rd263rd276th225th225th116th195th212th112th229th248th345th285th281st100th207th226th248th
2017-18263rd284th145th339th201st29th191st323rd37th327th200th336th324th243rd10th308th291st338th
2016-17237th177th83rd311th263rd60th206th302nd207th293rd246th247th341st345th34th285th260th314th
2015-16228th255th98th203rd271st41st234th298th247th259th254th317th284th322nd30th296th243rd316th
2014-15306th244th228th317th291st21st279th337th297th279th227th133rd319th320th13th333rd240th336th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25200th314th--194th158th29th251st247th59th304th120th263rd34th81st22nd250th303rd332nd
2023-2494th290th--47th121st159th138th251st212th40th168th286th121st55th213th288th67th87th
2022-23226th242nd--350th85th234th207th300th39th220th108th309th350th243rd155th254th142nd179th
2021-22197th146th--268th146th312th161st246th179th82nd204th106th163rd60th280th206th52nd51st
2020-21168th290th--165th110th292nd133rd92nd326th147th20th169th290th126th303rd85th140th85th
2019-20239th304th--74th195th261st217th49th230th134th175th122nd227th121st298th58th174th109th
2018-19296th283rd--106th282nd304th299th105th350th63rd234th60th154th133rd321st117th65th34th
2017-18327th111th--343rd265th247th311th185th229th304th170th330th230th182nd141st117th253rd243rd
2016-17336th291st--297th273rd122nd299th151st235th333rd180th324th317th308th67th109th308th312th
2015-16347th201st--292nd340th141st345th153rd310th311th265th301st243rd263rd92nd120th290th295th
2014-15238th193rd--183rd252nd143rd142nd119th327th267th175th90th278th298th137th114th269th255th