TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Loyola Marymount  22-12 (0.647)  |  West Coast
All-Play Percentage: 0.682 (113th)
Schedule Strength: 0.520 (146th)
Record Quality: 0.139 (107th)
Avg. Season Rank: 120.39 (123rd)
Pace: 64.04 (349th)
Momentum: 1.37 (106th)
Off. Momentum: 1.99 (83rd)
Def. Momentum: -0.61 (175th)
Consistency: -8.46 (57th)
Res. Consistency: -12.14 (170th)
Away From Home: -0.04 (173rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.44 (119th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.07 27.01 74.74 82.50 45.26 24.54 33.45 23.35 37.96 34.62 58.55 12.81 13.80 6.10 29.74 28.30 41.96 1.88
RANK: 164th 135th 62nd 221st 114th 346th 224th 97th 86th 38th 200th 95th 161st 148th 347th 85th 34th 5th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.46 26.41 -- 81.02 42.63 33.95 32.23 18.45 34.71 28.62 60.08 11.68 12.45 5.77 41.91 22.77 35.32 2.07
RANK: 111th 196th -- 78th 99th 253rd 49th 67th 116th 96th 178th 181st 86th 138th 306th 86th 127th 87th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Loyola Marymount should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. They have a record of 22-12 and are ranked 113th overall (out of 353) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 10 schools in the WCC (average ranking 126.0), they're currently ranked as our #6 team in the conference.

With an extremely deliberate pace (the fifth-slowest in D1), Loyola Marymount will likely call on their defense to win a majority of their games. The team is ranked 111th in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 101 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Loyola Marymount has done a very good job to prevent opponents from draining threes this year. They rank 49th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 32.2% of their attempts from afar. And to expose that weakness, this team will force AO to shoot the three more than they usually would. Of AO's total field goals, a large chunk of them (41.9%) will come from long-distance.

Loyola Marymount is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 164th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Loyola Marymount will make a strong effort to get off as many field goals close to the basket as they can. The ball-club is 34th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 58.5% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. Loyola Marymount also converts a fair amount of its free throws. Making 74.7% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 62nd nationally in free throw percentage.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Loyola Marymount performs worse against squads that convert well from the charity stripe. When facing teams that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 74.32%, Loyola Marymount is more efficient than normal 20% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 64% of the time.
When playing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, Loyola Marymount usually performs better than average. Loyola Marymount is more efficient than normal 65% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.40%. In all other contests, Loyola Marymount performs better than average 25% of the time.
Loyola Marymount is typically better vs. teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.99%, Loyola Marymount performs above their norm 75% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 35% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Bulls Face Loyola Marymount For Spot in CBI Finals
(3/29/2019 9:47:00 AM) The College Basketball ... 62.7 points per game. Loyola Marymount also stood second in the conference with 7.4 steals per game. Senior guard James Batemon leads the Lions with 16.6 points, 3.6 ...
Bulls Top Loyola Marymount to Reach CBI Finals
(3/29/2019 9:02:00 AM) with a 56-47 victory over Loyola Marymount Thursday evening at the Yuengling Center. Yetna (Paris) scored 11 points and grabbed 11 rebounds and has posted a double-double in all three games of the ...
Bulls defeat Loyola-Marymount, advance to CBI finals
(3/29/2019 5:50:00 AM) The Bulls made history and advanced to the College Basketball Invitational championship series, as they defeated Loyola-Marymount 56-47 on Thursday night at the Yuengling Center. The victory tied USF’s single-season record for wins with 22 and set a new ...
Brown hoops season ends in CBI loss
(3/26/2019 9:26:00 AM) LOS ANGELES - Brown's run in the CBI ended far from the East Side Monday night. The Bears traveled to Loyola Marymount and were unable to overcome a talented and physical Lions team in a 81-63 defeat at Gersten Pavilion in the second round of the College ...
Batemon carries Loyola Marymount over Brown 81-63 in CBI
(3/26/2019 12:29:00 AM) LOS ANGELES (AP) James Batemon had 21 points as Loyola Marymount topped Brown 81-63 in the College Basketball Invitational second round on Monday night. Joe Quintana had 12 points for Loyola Marymount (22-11). Mattias Markusson and Zafir Williams had 11 ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25133rd133rd164th154thWCC220th338th118th81st231st141st
2023-24208th208th286th245thWCC337th349th142nd291st306th168th
2022-23130th130th106th89thWCC194th142nd101st225th190th105th
2021-22194th194th265th220thWCC261st282nd105th319th168th152nd
2020-21108th106th121st76thWCC284th255th94th254th75th106th
2019-20188th188th292nd236thWCC351st30th99th298th58th183rd
2018-19113th113th75th107thWCC349th57th146th119th173rd123rd
2017-18218th218th282nd251stWCC263rd14th126th96th19th190th
2016-17183rd183rd179th183rdWCC187th64th149th162nd229th176th
2015-16223rd222nd213th197thWCC219th76th139th268th37th211th
2014-15254th254th331st259thWCC241st139th63rd102nd108th242nd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25189th318th201st166th145th150th140th83rd57th323rd129th270th296th237th154th88th323rd280th
2023-24133rd296th123rd26th184th124th128th100th65th215th257th341st107th136th169th125th258th237th
2022-23119th151st328th148th144th42nd83rd326th218th126th162nd278th132nd162nd41st333rd136th269th
2021-22111th147th184th294th53rd211th68th331st61st32nd163rd318th246th119th176th327th15th63rd
2020-2192nd27th94th351st31st219th155th357th31st11th135th343rd94th16th153rd356th4th28th
2019-20208th161st237th328th64th238th317th340th93rd19th102nd300th237th99th195th338th6th37th
2018-19164th135th62nd221st114th346th224th97th86th38th200th95th161st148th347th85th34th5th
2017-18127th171st169th48th168th270th93rd185th333rd10th223rd44th18th13th295th217th26th26th
2016-17202nd235th350th200th127th174th85th289th270th51st204th36th167th146th170th289th46th109th
2015-16212th339th99th50th234th157th233rd113th158th129th232nd172nd181st158th186th136th188th162nd
2014-15225th178th127th188th229th280th112th120th259th124th257th114th21st18th276th110th119th81st
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25108th150th--336th55th176th63rd326th189th185th20th130th269th198th109th301st123rd185th
2023-24312th156th--344th238th126th306th306th239th292nd165th183rd261st233rd60th274th219th278th
2022-23179th232nd--123rd209th42nd205th242nd263rd248th123rd33rd29th30th52nd258th273rd303rd
2021-22284th193rd--124th319th126th301st129th266th256th306th332nd123rd228th142nd138th273rd260th
2020-21127th284th--22nd167th104th275th86th81st154th147th329th2nd17th169th142nd225th210th
2019-20198th275th--104th131st343rd63rd1st48th191st276th328th24th124th344th2nd212th50th
2018-19111th196th--78th99th253rd49th67th116th96th178th181st86th138th306th86th127th87th
2017-18315th298th--47th328th122nd300th46th293rd242nd308th143rd282nd279th172nd58th277th252nd
2016-17155th306th--26th225th57th119th46th228th249th190th243rd276th309th112th78th305th289th
2015-16254th288th--49th260th232nd317th33rd136th170th235th197th198th233rd285th46th221st132nd
2014-15271st147th--189th251st308th309th39th237th201st184th305th142nd146th309th30th194th94th