TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Loyola-Chicago  10-21 (0.323)  |  Atlantic 10
All-Play Percentage: 0.378 (226th)
Schedule Strength: 0.499 (135th)
Record Quality: -0.140 (256th)
Avg. Season Rank: 206.05 (209th)
Pace: 67.08 (222nd)
Momentum: -0.11 (183rd)
Off. Momentum: 0.88 (165th)
Def. Momentum: -0.99 (197th)
Consistency: -9.55 (227th)
Res. Consistency: -12.21 (189th)
Away From Home: -0.30 (139th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.06 (202nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-dependent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.26 24.07 69.80 79.22 45.93 30.90 34.62 19.29 36.92 29.03 63.94 9.17 11.13 4.71 39.00 24.35 36.64 2.02
RANK: 229th 235th 256th 353rd 74th 192nd 148th 315th 230th 197th 48th 270th 314th 247th 113th 290th 109th 191st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.11 27.53 -- 84.00 44.60 30.63 34.19 24.32 38.92 29.04 60.34 13.47 13.75 4.71 36.47 28.96 34.58 2.02
RANK: 248th 275th -- 141st 210th 165th 190th 207th 226th 157th 226th 345th 170th 94th 176th 219th 165th 183rd

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Loyola-Chicago should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. They have a record of 10-21 and are ranked 226th overall (out of 363) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #14 team (out of 15) in the A-10 (average ranking 156.7).

Loyola-Chicago does not have a terribly exceptional defense this year. Rated at #248 in defensive efficiency, they allow around 106 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Loyola-Chicago has some difficulty staying out of foul trouble, leading to an excess of free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 27.53 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #275 in the country in that category.

Loyola-Chicago doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 100 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #229 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Loyola-Chicago happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked 353rd in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 79.22 vs. AO. Loyola-Chicago also tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.47, which ranks 345th in D1. If Loyola-Chicago does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to convert efficiently from the inside. The squad makes 63.9% of their near-proximity field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 48th in the country.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Loyola-Chicago does worse vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 57.30%, Loyola-Chicago performs above average 29% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 90% of the time.
Loyola-Chicago performs worse against squads that are typically efficient on offense. When facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 102.12, Loyola-Chicago is more efficient than normal 24% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 79% of the time.
When playing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Loyola-Chicago usually performs worse than average. Loyola-Chicago is more efficient than normal 20% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 25.78. In all other contests, Loyola-Chicago performs better than average 75% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
2024-25101st101st64th68thA-10222nd129th132nd119th274th113th
2023-2478th78th42nd61stA-10111th84th113th104th316th113th
2022-23226th226th313th256thA-10222nd227th135th202nd139th209th
2021-2226th26th32nd26thMVC300th356th95th327th198th20th
2020-2112th12th7th23rdMVC349th273rd117th66th79th26th
2019-20113th113th72nd100thMVC308th120th154th186th316th107th
2018-19104th104th114th134thMVC337th353rd180th280th350th96th
2017-1839th39th6th18thMVC317th131st103rd98th149th71st
2016-1794th94th134th152ndMVC288th134th146th229th147th87th
2015-16174th172nd203rd190thMVC317th321st168th23rd80th199th
2014-15144th144th78th104thMVC327th224th149th268th17th153rd
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-25128th195th307th204th102nd58th167th280th48th245th65th250th214th193rd52nd280th248th306th
2023-24176th132nd319th260th146th133rd91st346th332nd34th193rd46th210th260th111th344th21st104th
2022-23229th235th256th353rd74th192nd148th315th230th197th48th270th314th247th113th290th109th191st
2021-2267th182nd204th254th42nd49th47th356th223rd45th72nd77th261st224th36th355th37th210th
2020-2133rd108th119th142nd26th133rd86th312th114th38th31st101st299th181st140th320th41st112th
2019-20150th49th339th349th8th328th45th329th104th16th63rd83rd340th228th300th307th3rd4th
2018-19156th271st310th335th10th326th18th278th36th43rd82nd150th333rd162nd308th253rd12th11th
2017-1854th280th130th299th1st273rd5th326th10th14th58th59th330th125th236th313th8th24th
2016-17100th289th105th270th36th193rd45th252nd4th120th110th101st346th293rd171st239th89th143rd
2015-16236th311th54th222nd211th228th173rd86th107th270th224th121st322nd336th220th69th254th188th
2014-15124th246th227th266th27th274th59th139th29th167th64th79th309th95th259th117th134th100th
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
2024-2589th188th--204th82nd62nd165th294th48th214th59th75th330th266th61st289th208th275th
2023-2421st267th--60th22nd29th56th228th10th212th28th241st147th22nd46th259th259th309th
2022-23248th275th--141st210th165th190th207th226th157th226th345th170th94th176th219th165th183rd
2021-2216th124th--78th30th32nd8th307th45th118th66th31st27th53rd52nd323rd141st252nd
2020-216th7th--73rd64th12th95th340th166th69th22nd11th13th69th23rd349th95th251st
2019-2090th10th--49th257th235th316th145th245th38th241st72nd14th152nd289th192nd59th46th
2018-1979th2nd--146th165th218th271st266th241st68th146th158th36th70th224th277th60th83rd
2017-1838th8th--277th45th241st11th249th25th159th192nd291st295th201st190th236th125th127th
2016-17120th72nd--53rd218th81st289th193rd221st119th165th45th118th205th124th238th153rd196th
2015-16129th138th--72nd178th84th257th226th103rd130th198th140th146th170th120th252nd159th193rd
2014-15147th53rd--274th166th304th52nd100th241st217th218th230th299th318th292nd65th179th109th